On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.govwrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io
wrote:
Right now we are trying to balance difficult things: stable releases
with experimental development.
Perhaps a more formal development
hi all,
free solver interalg for global nonlinear optimization with specifiable
accuracy now can handle categorical variables, disjunctive (and other
logical) constraints, thus making it available to solve GDP, possibly in
multiobjective form.
There are ~ 2 months till next OpenOpt release,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za
wrote:
If you are referring to the traditional concept of a fork, and not to
the type we frequently make on GitHub, then I'm surprised that no
Hi,
Le 24/04/2012 15:14, Charles R Harris a écrit :
a) All arrays should be implicitly masked, even if the mask isn't
initially allocated. The maskna keyword can then be removed, taking
with it the sense that there are two kinds of arrays.
From my lazy user perspective, having masked and
Hi,
I finished reading the doc I listed in the other thread. As the NA
stuff will be marked as Experimental in numpy 1.7, why not define a
new macro like NPY_NA_VERSION that will give the version of the NA
C-api? That way, people will be able to detect if there is change in
the c-api of NA when
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Pierre Haessig
pierre.haes...@crans.org wrote:
Hi,
Le 24/04/2012 15:14, Charles R Harris a écrit :
a) All arrays should be implicitly masked, even if the mask isn't
initially allocated. The maskna keyword can then be removed, taking
with it the sense that
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za
wrote:
If you are referring to the traditional concept
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:25 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Pierre Haessig
pierre.haes...@crans.org wrote:
Hi,
Le 24/04/2012 15:14, Charles R Harris a écrit :
a) All arrays should be implicitly masked, even if the mask isn't
initially allocated. The
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:25 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Pierre Haessig
pierre.haes...@crans.org wrote:
Hi,
Le 24/04/2012 15:14, Charles R Harris a écrit :
a)
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:25 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Pierre Haessig
pierre.haes...@crans.org wrote:
Hi,
Le 24/04/2012 15:14, Charles R Harris a écrit :
a)
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Pierre Haessig
pierre.haes...@crans.org wrote:
If the idea of having two payloads is to avoid a maximum of skipna
friends extra keywords, I would like it much. My feeling with my small
experience with R is that I end up calling every function with a
different
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:25 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Pierre Haessig
pierre.haes...@crans.org
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
The advantage of nans, I suppose, is that they are in the hardware and so
Why are we having a discussion on NAN's in a thread on consensus?
This is a strong indicator of the problem we're facing.
Stéfan
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.zawrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
The advantage of nans, I suppose, is that they are in the hardware and so
Why are we having a discussion on NAN's in a thread on
2012/4/24 Frédéric Bastien no...@nouiz.org
Hi,
I finished reading the doc I listed in the other thread. As the NA
stuff will be marked as Experimental in numpy 1.7, why not define a
new macro like NPY_NA_VERSION that will give the version of the NA
C-api? That way, people will be able to
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Should be 6 in 1.6
# Binary compatibility version number. This number is increased whenever the
# C-API is changed such that binary compatibility is broken, i.e. whenever a
# recompile of extension modules is
2012/4/24 Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
The advantage of nans, I suppose, is that they are in the hardware and so
Why are we having a discussion on NAN's in a thread on consensus?
This is a strong
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/4/24 Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
The advantage of nans, I suppose, is that they are in the hardware and
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Why are we having a discussion on NAN's in a thread on consensus?
This is a strong indicator of the problem we're facing.
We seem to have a consensus regarding interest in the topic.
For the benefit of those of
Thanks for the reminder, Stefan and keeping us on track.
It is very helpful to those trying to sort through the messages to keep the
discussions to one subject per thread.
-Travis
On Apr 24, 2012, at 2:23 PM, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Charles R Harris
On Apr 24, 2012, at 6:01 PM, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Why are we having a discussion on NAN's in a thread on consensus?
This is a strong indicator of the problem we're facing.
We seem to have a consensus
On Apr 24, 2012, at 5:52 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/4/24 Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
The advantage
2012/4/24 Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Why are we having a discussion on NAN's in a thread on consensus?
This is a strong indicator of the problem we're facing.
We seem to have a consensus
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
On Apr 24, 2012, at 6:01 PM, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Why are we having a discussion on NAN's in a thread on consensus?
This
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
But a right to veto doesn't automatically extend to everyone who happens to
have
an interest in a topic.
The time has long gone when we simply hacked on NumPy for our own
benefit; if you will, NumPy users are
On Tuesday, April 24, 2012, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com javascript:; wrote:
2012/4/24 Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za javascript:;
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Charles R Harris
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
I think we adhere to these pretty well already, the problem is with the word
'everyone'. I grew up in Massachusetts where town meetings were a tradition.
At those meetings the townsfolk voted on the budget,
On Apr 24, 2012, at 6:59 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
On Apr 24, 2012, at 6:01 PM, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Why are we
On Apr 24, 2012, at 7:16 PM, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
But a right to veto doesn't automatically extend to everyone who happens to
have
an interest in a topic.
This is not my view, but it is Charles view
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za
wrote:
If you are referring to the traditional concept of a
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Stéfan van der Walt
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Fernando
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
I admit to a certain curiosity about your own involvement in FOSS projects,
and I know I'm not alone in this. Google shows several years of discussion
on Monotone, but I have no idea what your contributions were
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
I admit to a certain curiosity about your own involvement in FOSS
projects,
and I know I'm not alone in this. Google shows several
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Fernando, I'm not checking credentials, I'm curious.
Well, at least I think that an inquisitive query about someone's
background, phrased like that, can be very easily misread. I can only
speak for myself, but I
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:28 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Fernando, I'm not checking credentials, I'm curious.
Well, at least I think that an inquisitive query about someone's
background,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Fernando, I'm not checking credentials, I'm curious.
Well, at least I think that an inquisitive query about someone's
background,
On Apr 24, 2012, at 9:41 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Charles R Harris
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Turnover is a problem with open source, and no matter how much discussion
there is, if people aren't doing the work the whole thing sort of peters
out.
That's very true, and I hope that by building a friendly
On Apr 24, 2012, at 10:50 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Fernando, I'm not checking credentials, I'm curious.
Well, at least I
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
On Apr 24, 2012, at 10:50 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
On Apr 24, 2012, at 10:50 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 25, 2012, at 12:02 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
On Apr 24, 2012, at 10:50 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:02 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry that I missed this part of numpy history, I always had the
impression that numpy is run by a community led by Chuck and the young
guys, David, Pauli, Stefan, Pierre; and Robert on the mailing list .
(But I came late, and am
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 05:59:09PM -0600, Charles R Harris wrote:
Travis, if you are playing the BDFL role, then just make the darn decision
and remove the code so we can get on with life. As it is you go back and
forth and that does none of us any good, you're a big guy and you're
rocking the
I've given several talks on the subject, but I don't think I've ever written a
blog-post about it. A reasonable history does exist in the beginning of
the Guide to NumPy which is still available for free at
http://www.tramy.us/numpybook.pdf
-Travis
On Apr 25, 2012, at 12:18 AM,
46 matches
Mail list logo
