On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:01 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Mads,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Mads Ipsen madsip...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to build numpy-1.6.1 with the following gcc compiler specs:
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/3.4.6
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Mads Ipsen madsip...@gmail.com wrote:
Yup, that fixes it. For now, we can apply a temporary fix on our build
system. Is this something that'll go into, say, 1.6.2?
That's more of a workaround than a fix. We need to decide whether we
disable intrinsics altogether
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Andreas Müller
amuel...@ais.uni-bonn.de wrote:
Hi everybody.
When I did some normalization using numpy, I noticed that numpy.std uses
more ram than I was expecting.
A quick google search gave me this:
http://luispedro.org/software/ncreduce
The site claims
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 1:34 PM,
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 6:22 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 10:08 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Charles R
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
We'll see how much interest there is. If it becomes official you may get
more feedback on features. There are some advantages to having some user
types in numpy. One is that otherwise they tend to get lost,
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Oleg Mikulya olegmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
How to make Numpy to match Matlab in term of performance ? I have tryied
with different options, using different MKL libraries and ICC versions,
still Numpy is below Matalb for certain basic tasks by ~2x. About 5
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 12:18 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi David,
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 3:02 PM, David
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Nathan Faggian
nathan.fagg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am finding it less than useful to have the negative index wrapping on
nd-arrays. Here is a short example:
import numpy as np
a = np.zeros((3, 3))
a[:,2] = 1000
print a[0,-1]
print a[0,-1]
print
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:04 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Ralf Gommers
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Wes McKinney wesmck...@gmail.com wrote:
Whenever I get motivated enough I'm going to make a pull request on
NumPy with something like khash.h and start fixing all the O(N log N)
algorithms floating around that ought to be O(N). NumPy should really
have a match
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Sturla Molden stu...@molden.no wrote:
On 27.10.2011 15:02, David Cournapeau wrote:
- we need to recompile atlas (but I can take care of it)
- the biggest: it is difficult to combine gfortran with visual
studio (more exactly you cannot link gfortran
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Sturla Molden stu...@molden.no wrote:
On 07.02.2012 14:38, Sturla Molden wrote:
May I suggest GotoBLAS2 instead of ATLAS?
Or OpenBLAS, which is GotoBLAS2 except it is still maintained.
I did not know GotoBLAS2 was open source (it wasn't last time I
checked).
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
I think supporting Python 2.5 and above is completely fine. I'd even be
in favor of bumping up to Python 2.6 for NumPy 1.7 and certainly
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:25 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
As Bruce said, 29 Feb 2012 and not 2014:
https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/
I think Bruce and me were not talking about the same RHEL version (4 vs 5).
Let me see if I can set up a buildbot
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
On 02/11/2012 10:44 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote:snip
2) You must be an admin to label an issue (i.e. set it as a bug,
enhancement, or so forth).
A
Hi Travis,
It is great that some resources can be spent to have people paid to
work on NumPy. Thank you for making that happen.
I am slightly confused about roadmaps for numpy 1.8 and 2.0. This
needs discussion on the ML, and our release manager currently is Ralf
- he is the one who ultimately
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
[ I'm broadcasting this widely for maximum reach, but I'd appreciate
it if replies can be kept to the *numpy* list, which is sort of the
'base' list for scientific/numerical work. It will make it much
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Peter Wang pw...@streamitive.com wrote:
On Feb 15, 2012, at 3:36 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
Honestly - as I was saying to Alan and indirectly to Ben - any formal
model - at all - is preferable to the current situation. Personally, I
would say that making the
Hi Travis,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
Mark Wiebe and I have been discussing off and on (as well as talking with
Charles) a good way forward to balance two competing desires:
* addition of new features that are needed in NumPy
*
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 8:01 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Travis,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io
wrote:
Mark Wiebe and I have been discussing
exported to other languages is in c...
David
Le 17 févr. 2012 18:21, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
On 02/17/2012 05:39 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 8:01 AM, David Cournapeau courn
Le 17 févr. 2012 17:58, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:27 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 8:01 AM, David Cournapeau courn
Le 18 févr. 2012 00:58, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com a
écrit :
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:44 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
wrote:
I don't think c++ has any significant advantage over c for high
performance libraries. I am not convinced by the number of people argument
Le 17 févr. 2012 18:21, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
On 02/17/2012 05:39 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 8:01 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
mailto:courn...@gmail.com wrote
Le 18 févr. 2012 03:53, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com a
écrit :
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 7:29 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
wrote:
Le 18 févr. 2012 00:58, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com a
écrit :
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:44 PM, David Cournapeau
Le 18 févr. 2012 04:37, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com a
écrit :
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 9:18 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
wrote:
Le 18 févr. 2012 03:53, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com a
écrit :
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 7:29 PM, David Cournapeau
Le 18 févr. 2012 06:18, Christopher Jordan-Squire cjord...@uw.edu a
écrit :
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Sturla Molden stu...@molden.no wrote:
Den 18. feb. 2012 kl. 05:01 skrev Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com:
On 2/17/12 9:54 PM, Sturla Molden wrote:
We would have to
Le 18 févr. 2012 11:25, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 04:54, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
I found this , which references 0mq (used by ipython) as an example of
a C++
library with a C interface. It seems enums can have different
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12:21 PM,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, we already have code obfuscation (DOUBLE_your_pleasure,
FLOAT_your_boat), so we might as well let the compiler handle it.
Yes, those are not great, but on the other hand, it is not that a
fundamental
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Sturla Molden stu...@molden.no wrote:
In an ideal world, we would have a better language than C++ that can
be spit out as C for portability.
What about a statically typed Python? (That is, not Cython.) We just
need to make the compiler :-)
There are
Hi Mark,
thank you for joining this discussion.
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
The suggestion of transitioning the NumPy core code from C to C++ has
sparked a vigorous debate, and I thought I'd start a new thread to give my
perspective on some of the
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 8:08 AM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 4:24 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, we already have code obfuscation (DOUBLE_your_pleasure
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 2:56 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Mark,
thank you for joining this discussion.
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
The suggestion
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there anyone who uses a blue gene or small device which needs up-to-date
numpy support, that I could talk to directly? We really need a list of
supported platforms on the numpy wiki we can refer to when discussing this
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Ben Walsh ben_w_...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 01:18:20 -0600
From: Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com
Subject: [Numpy-discussion] How a transition to C++ could work
To:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Paweł Biernat pw...@wp.pl wrote:
I am completely new to Numpy and I know only the basics of Python, to
this point I was using Fortran 03/08 to write numerical code. However,
I am starting a new large project of mine and I am looking forward to
using Python to
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Luis Pedro Coelho l...@cmu.edu wrote:
Hi,
I sort of missed the big C++ discussion, but I'd like to give some examples of
how writing code can become much simpler if you are based on C++. This is from
my mahotas package, which has a thin C++ wrapper around
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 05:11, Andreas Kloeckner
li...@informa.tiker.net wrote:
Hi Robert,
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 20:05:14 +, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 18:57, Andreas Kloeckner
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 6:20 AM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 03:53, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This is following the discussion on bug
http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/2017
Essentially, there is a discrepency between the actual
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
Why do we want to return a single string char instead of an int?
There is a need for more flags on the dtype object. Using an actual
attribute call seems like the way to go. This could even merge the contents
of
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Sturla Molden stu...@molden.no wrote:
On 05.03.2012 14:26, V. Armando Solé wrote:
In 2009 there was a thread in this mailing list concerning the access to
BLAS from C extension modules.
If I have properly understood the thread:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 18:25, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
Why do we want to return a single string char instead of an int?
I suspect just to ensure that any provided value fits in the range
0..255. But
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
Am I right in thinking that float96 on windows 32 bit is a float64
padded to 96 bits?
Yes
If so, is it useful?
Yes: this is what allows you to use dtype to parse complex binary files
directly in numpy
Hi Christoph,
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Christoph Dann
ch.ro.d...@googlemail.comwrote:
Dear list,
so far I used Enthoughts Python Distribution which contains a compiled
version of numpy linked against MKL. Now, I want to implement my own
extensions to numpy, so I need my build numpy
Hi,
I am pleased to announce a new release of bento, a packaging solution
for python which aims at reproducibility, extensibility and simplicity.
The main features of this 0.0.8.1 release are:
- Path sections can now use conditionals
- More reliable convert command to migrate
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Kamesh Krishnamurthy kames...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello all,
I profiled NumPy EIG and MATLAB EIG on the same Macbook pro, and both were
linking to the Accelerate framework BLAS. NumPy turns out to be ~4x slower.
I've posted details on Stackoverflow:
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 2:25 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
To see if this is an effect of numpy using C-order by default instead of
Fortran-order, try measuring eig(x.T) instead of eig(x)?
Just to be
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Bryan Van de Ven bry...@continuum.iowrote:
On 4/3/12 4:18 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
Here some first impressions.
The good:
- It's responsive!
- It remembers my preferences
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:53 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Bryan Van de
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 9:29 PM, william ratcliff
william.ratcl...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone tried Rietveld, Gerrit, or Phabricator?
rietveld and gerrit are code review tools. I have not heard of phabricator,
but this article certainly makes it sounds interesting:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io
wrote:
Do you agree that Numpy has not been very successful in recruiting and
maintaining new developers compared to its large
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Charles R Harris
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 5:31 PM, mark florisson
markflorisso...@gmail.comwrote:
On 12 May 2012 22:55, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no
wrote:
On 05/11/2012 03:37 PM, mark florisson wrote:
On 11 May 2012 12:13, Dag Sverre Seljebotnd.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no
wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
Hey all,
After reading all the discussion around masked arrays and getting input
from as many people as possible, it is clear that
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Andreas Hilboll li...@hilboll.de wrote:
Hi,
I just noticed that there's a PPA for NumPy/SciPy on Launchpad:
https://launchpad.net/~scipy/+archive/ppa
However, it's painfully outdated. Does anyone know of its status? Is it
'official'? Are there any plans
Not the neighborhood one, though. It would be good if this iterator had a
cython wrapper, and ndimage used that, though.
Le 13 juin 2012 18:59, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com a
écrit :
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
I'm rewriting
Hi,
I am pleased to announce a new release of bento, a packaging solution
for python which aims at reproducibility, extensibility and simplicity.
The main features of this 0.1.0 release are:
- new commands register_pypi and upload_pypi to register a package
to
pypi and
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
Just submitted this pull request for discussion:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/297
As per earlier discussion on the list, this PR attempts
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 5:20 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote:
My understanding is that Travis is simply trying to stress We have to
think about the implications of our changes on existing users. and
also that little changes (with the best intentions!) that however mean
either
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 8:35 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com
wrote:
My understanding is that Travis is simply trying to stress
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:17 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
On Jun 25, 2012, at 10:35 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com
wrote:
My understanding is that Travis is simply trying to stress We have to
think
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 06/26/2012 05:35 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Ondřej Čertíkondrej.cer...@gmail.com
wrote:
My understanding is that Travis is simply trying to stress We have to
think
Hi,
I am just continuing the discussion around ABI/API, the technical side
of things that is, as this is unrelated to 1.7.x. release.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 06/26/2012 11:58 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 06/26/2012 01:48 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
Hi,
I am just continuing the discussion around ABI/API, the technical side
of things that is, as this is unrelated to 1.7.x. release.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
Let us note that that problem was due to Travis convincing David to
include the Datetime work in the release against David's own best judgement.
The result was a delay of several months until Ralf could get up to speed
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
Currently the numpy build system(s) support two ways of building
numpy: either by compiling a giant concatenated C file, or by the more
conventional route of first compiling each .c file to a .o file, and
then linking those
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:50 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
Currently the numpy build system(s) support two ways of building
numpy
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:29 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:50 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
wrote
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 06/27/2012 09:53 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:29 PM, David Cournapeaucourn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Nathaniel Smithn...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun
Hi Travis,
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
Hey all,
I'd like to propose dropping support for Python 2.4 in NumPy 1.8 (not the 1.7
release). What does everyone think of that?
I think it would depend on 1.7 state. I am unwilling to drop support
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Pierre Haessig
pierre.haes...@crans.org wrote:
Hi Nathaniel,
Le 27/06/2012 20:22, Nathaniel Smith a écrit :
According to the Travis-CI build logs, this code produces
non-deterministic
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Uwe Schmitt uschm...@mineway.de wrote:
Hi,
I have unreproducable crashes on a customers Win 7 machine with Python 2.7.2
and
Numpy 1.6.1. He gets the following message:
Problem signature:
Problem Event Name: APPCRASH
Application Name: python.exe
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:05 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
But seriously, what compilers do we support that don't have
-fvisibility
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 7:36 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:05 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
wrote
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Andrew Dalke da...@dalkescientific.com wrote:
In this email I propose a few changes which I think are minor
and which don't really affect the external NumPy API but which
I think could improve the import numpy performance by at
least 40%. This affects me because
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 11:15 PM, Andrew Dalke da...@dalkescientific.com wrote:
On Jul 2, 2012, at 11:38 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
No, that's the wrong thing to test, because it effectively amounts to
'import numpy', sicne the numpy __init__ file is still executed. As
David indicated, you must
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
To be clear, this subthread started with the caveat *as far as our
officially supported platforms go* -- I'm not saying that we should
go around and remove all the NPY_NO_EXPORT macros tomorrow.
However, the only reason
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Ralf Gommers
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Working lazy imports would be useful to have. Ralf is opposed to the idea
because it caused all sorts of problems on different platforms when it was
tried in scipy. I thought I'd open the topic for
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:31 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Working lazy imports would
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 2:20 AM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 8:22 PM, John Salvatier
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote:
So I have tried the MinGW-5.0.3.exe in Wine, but it tries to install
from some wrong url and it fails to install.
I have unpacked the tarballs by hand into ~/.wine/drive_c/MinGW:
Not surprising, that MinGW is
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote:
So I have tried the MinGW-5.0.3.exe in Wine, but it tries to install
from some wrong url and it fails to install.
I have unpacked the tarballs by hand into ~/.wine/drive_c/MinGW:
binutils-2.17.50-20070129-1.tar.gz
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
Hey all,
I'm wondering who has tried to make NumPy work with Python 3.3. The Unicode
handling was significantly improved in Python 3.3 and the array-scalar code
(which assumed a certain structure for
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:28 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
Hey all,
I'm wondering who has tried to make NumPy work with Python 3.3. The
Unicode handling was significantly improved in Python 3.3
Hi,
During last PyCon, Olivier Grisel (from scikits-learn fame) and myself
looked into a nasty bug on mac os x: https://gist.github.com/2027412.
The short story is that I believe this means numpy cannot be used with
multiprocessing if linked against accelerate framework, and as such we
should
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Aron Ahmadia a...@ahmadia.net wrote:
Hi David,
Apple's response here is somewhat confusing, but I will add that on the
supercomputing side of things we rarely fork, as this is not well-supported
from the vendors or the hardware (it's hard enough to
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Stefan Krah stefan-use...@bytereef.org wrote:
Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Stefan Krah stefan-use...@bytereef.org
wrote:
switch (descr-byteorder) {
case '':
byteorder = -1;
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Andrew Nelson andyf...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Pierre,
as indicated yesterday OSX system python is in:
/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/
I am installing into:
/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/Current/lib/python2.7/site-packages
This
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Those are not the original Fortran sources. The original Fortran sources are
in the public domain as work done by a US federal employee.
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:34 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote
Hi Ondrej,
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've created this repository:
https://github.com/certik/numpy-vendor
which uses Vagrant and Fabric to fully automate the setup creation
of NumPy binaries for Windows. The setup is especially
Hi Ondrej,
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
How should one use the vendor repository (https://github.com/numpy/vendor)
in Wine? Should I put the binaries into .wine/drive_c/Python25/libs/,
or somewhere else?
I've search all mailinglists and I
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 11:06 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ondrej,
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
How should one use the vendor repository (https
Hi,
I have started toying with implementing a quad precision dtype for
numpy on supported platforms, using the __float128 + quadmath lib from
gcc. I have noticed invalid (and unexpected) downcast to long double
in some cases, especially for ufuncs (e.g. when I don't define my own
ufunc for a
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
I'm actually not sure, why. I think the issue is making sure that the
release manager can actually build NumPy without having to buy a
1 - 100 of 2096 matches
Mail list logo
