Le 19/10/2016 à 01:18, Allan Haldane a écrit :
> Based on feedback so far, I think "propagate_mask" sounds like the best
> word to use. Let's go with that.
>
> As for whether it should default to "True" or "False", the arguments I
> see are:
>
> * False, because that is the way most functions like
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Allan Haldane
wrote:
> As for whether it should default to "True" or "False", the arguments I
> see are:
>
> * False, because that is the way most functions like `np.ma.sum`
>already work, as well as matlab and octave's similar "nanconv".
>
> * True, because
On 10/17/2016 01:01 PM, Pierre Haessig wrote:
> Le 16/10/2016 à 11:52, Hanno Klemm a écrit :
>> When I have similar situations, I usually interpolate between the valid
>> values. I assume there are a lot of use cases for convolutions but I have
>> difficulties imagining that ignoring a missing va
On 10/16/2016 05:52 AM, Hanno Klemm wrote:
>
>
>> On 16 Oct 2016, at 03:21, Allan Haldane wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/14/2016 07:49 PM, Juan Nunez-Iglesias wrote:
>>> +1 for propagate_mask. That is the only proposal that immediately makes
>>> sense to me. "contagious" may be cute but I think approximate
On 10/17/2016 01:01 PM, Pierre Haessig wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Le 16/10/2016 à 11:52, Hanno Klemm a écrit :
>> When I have similar situations, I usually interpolate between the valid
>> values. I assume there are a lot of use cases for convolutions but I have
>> difficulties imagining that ignoring
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 1:30 PM, wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 1:25 PM, wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Pierre Haessig
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 16/10/2016 à 11:52, Hanno Klemm a écrit :
When I have similar situations, I usually interpolate between the valid
val
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 1:25 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Pierre Haessig
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> Le 16/10/2016 à 11:52, Hanno Klemm a écrit :
>>> When I have similar situations, I usually interpolate between the valid
>>> values. I assume there are a lot of use cases for convo
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Pierre Haessig
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Le 16/10/2016 à 11:52, Hanno Klemm a écrit :
>> When I have similar situations, I usually interpolate between the valid
>> values. I assume there are a lot of use cases for convolutions but I have
>> difficulties imagining that i
Hi,
Le 16/10/2016 à 11:52, Hanno Klemm a écrit :
> When I have similar situations, I usually interpolate between the valid
> values. I assume there are a lot of use cases for convolutions but I have
> difficulties imagining that ignoring a missing value and, for the purpose of
> the computatio
> On 16 Oct 2016, at 03:21, Allan Haldane wrote:
>
>> On 10/14/2016 07:49 PM, Juan Nunez-Iglesias wrote:
>> +1 for propagate_mask. That is the only proposal that immediately makes
>> sense to me. "contagious" may be cute but I think approximately 0% of
>> users would guess its purpose on first
On 10/14/2016 07:49 PM, Juan Nunez-Iglesias wrote:
+1 for propagate_mask. That is the only proposal that immediately makes
sense to me. "contagious" may be cute but I think approximately 0% of
users would guess its purpose on first use.
Can you elaborate on what happens with the masks exactly? I
+1 for propagate_mask. That is the only proposal that immediately makes sense
to me. "contagious" may be cute but I think approximately 0% of users would
guess its purpose on first use.
Can you elaborate on what happens with the masks exactly? I didn't quite get
why propagate_mask=False was uni
I think the possibilities that have been mentioned so far (here or in
the PR) are:
contagious
contagious_mask
propagate
propagate_mask
propagated
`propogate_mask=False` seemed to imply that the mask would never be set,
so Eric also suggested
propagate_mask='any' or propagate_mask='all'
I would
Why not "propagated"?
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Sebastian Berg
wrote:
> On Fr, 2016-10-14 at 13:00 -0400, Allan Haldane wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Eric Wieser has a PR which defines new functions np.ma.correlate and
> > np.ma.convolve:
> >
> > https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/7922
> >
On Fr, 2016-10-14 at 13:00 -0400, Allan Haldane wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Eric Wieser has a PR which defines new functions np.ma.correlate and
> np.ma.convolve:
>
> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/7922
>
> We're deciding how to name the keyword arg which determines whether
> masked elements are "
Hi all,
Eric Wieser has a PR which defines new functions np.ma.correlate and
np.ma.convolve:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/7922
We're deciding how to name the keyword arg which determines whether
masked elements are "propagated" in the convolution sums. Currently we
are leaning towards cal
16 matches
Mail list logo