Thanks all for the feedback!
So there appears to be interest for this feature, and I think that I can
implement it. However, it may take a while before I do so: I have other
priorities right now.
In view of jaimefrio's comment on
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/4965 as well as Eelco
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 6:26 AM, Pierre-Andre Noel
noel.pierre.an...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks all for the feedback!
So there appears to be interest for this feature, and I think that I can
implement it. However, it may take a while before I do so: I have other
priorities right now.
In
On Do, 2014-08-14 at 12:42 -0700, Stephan Hoyer wrote:
I think this would be very nice addition.
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu
wrote:
You had me at Kronecker delta... :-) +1
Sounds good to me. I don't see a reason for not relaxing the
Agreed; this addition occurred to me as well. Note that the implemenatation
should be straightforward: just allocate an enlarged array, use some
striding logic to construct the relevant view, and let einsums internals
act on the view. hopefully, you wont even have to touch the guts of einsum
at
On Fr, 2014-08-15 at 16:42 +0200, Eelco Hoogendoorn wrote:
Agreed; this addition occurred to me as well. Note that the
implemenatation should be straightforward: just allocate an enlarged
array, use some striding logic to construct the relevant view, and let
einsums internals act on the view.
Well, there is the numpy-API C level, and then there is the arcane macro C
level. The two might as well be a completely different language.
Indeed, it should be doing something similar for the inputs. Actually, I
think I wrote a wrapper around einsum/numexpr once that performed this
generalized
here is a snippet I extracted from a project with similar aims (integrating
the functionality of einsum and numexpr, actually)
Not much to it, but in case someone needs a reminder on how to use striding
tricks:
http://pastebin.com/kQNySjcj
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Eelco Hoogendoorn
You had me at Kronecker delta... :-) +1
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Pierre-Andre Noel
noel.pierre.an...@gmail.com wrote:
(I created issue 4965 earlier today on this topic, and I have been
advised to email to this mailing list to discuss whether it is a good
idea or not. I include my
I think this would be very nice addition.
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
You had me at Kronecker delta... :-) +1
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Pierre-Andre Noel
noel.pierre.an...@gmail.com wrote:
(I created issue 4965 earlier today on this
