Le 19/10/2016 à 01:18, Allan Haldane a écrit :
> Based on feedback so far, I think "propagate_mask" sounds like the best
> word to use. Let's go with that.
>
> As for whether it should default to "True" or "False", the arguments I
> see are:
>
> * False, because that is the way most functions like
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Allan Haldane
wrote:
> As for whether it should default to "True" or "False", the arguments I
> see are:
>
> * False, because that is the way most functions like `np.ma.sum`
>already work, as well as matlab and octave's similar "nanconv".
>
> * True, because
On 10/17/2016 01:01 PM, Pierre Haessig wrote:
> Le 16/10/2016 à 11:52, Hanno Klemm a écrit :
>> When I have similar situations, I usually interpolate between the valid
>> values. I assume there are a lot of use cases for convolutions but I have
>> difficulties imagining that ignoring a missing va
On 10/16/2016 05:52 AM, Hanno Klemm wrote:
>
>
>> On 16 Oct 2016, at 03:21, Allan Haldane wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/14/2016 07:49 PM, Juan Nunez-Iglesias wrote:
>>> +1 for propagate_mask. That is the only proposal that immediately makes
>>> sense to me. "contagious" may be cute but I think approximate
On 10/17/2016 01:01 PM, Pierre Haessig wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Le 16/10/2016 à 11:52, Hanno Klemm a écrit :
>> When I have similar situations, I usually interpolate between the valid
>> values. I assume there are a lot of use cases for convolutions but I have
>> difficulties imagining that ignoring
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 1:30 PM, wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 1:25 PM, wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Pierre Haessig
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 16/10/2016 à 11:52, Hanno Klemm a écrit :
When I have similar situations, I usually interpolate between the valid
val
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 1:25 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Pierre Haessig
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> Le 16/10/2016 à 11:52, Hanno Klemm a écrit :
>>> When I have similar situations, I usually interpolate between the valid
>>> values. I assume there are a lot of use cases for convo
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Pierre Haessig
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Le 16/10/2016 à 11:52, Hanno Klemm a écrit :
>> When I have similar situations, I usually interpolate between the valid
>> values. I assume there are a lot of use cases for convolutions but I have
>> difficulties imagining that i
Hi,
Le 16/10/2016 à 11:52, Hanno Klemm a écrit :
> When I have similar situations, I usually interpolate between the valid
> values. I assume there are a lot of use cases for convolutions but I have
> difficulties imagining that ignoring a missing value and, for the purpose of
> the computatio
> On 16 Oct 2016, at 03:21, Allan Haldane wrote:
>
>> On 10/14/2016 07:49 PM, Juan Nunez-Iglesias wrote:
>> +1 for propagate_mask. That is the only proposal that immediately makes
>> sense to me. "contagious" may be cute but I think approximately 0% of
>> users would guess its purpose on first
On 10/14/2016 07:49 PM, Juan Nunez-Iglesias wrote:
+1 for propagate_mask. That is the only proposal that immediately makes
sense to me. "contagious" may be cute but I think approximately 0% of
users would guess its purpose on first use.
Can you elaborate on what happens with the masks exactly? I
+1 for propagate_mask. That is the only proposal that immediately makes sense
to me. "contagious" may be cute but I think approximately 0% of users would
guess its purpose on first use.
Can you elaborate on what happens with the masks exactly? I didn't quite get
why propagate_mask=False was uni
I think the possibilities that have been mentioned so far (here or in
the PR) are:
contagious
contagious_mask
propagate
propagate_mask
propagated
`propogate_mask=False` seemed to imply that the mask would never be set,
so Eric also suggested
propagate_mask='any' or propagate_mask='all'
I would
Why not "propagated"?
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Sebastian Berg
wrote:
> On Fr, 2016-10-14 at 13:00 -0400, Allan Haldane wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Eric Wieser has a PR which defines new functions np.ma.correlate and
> > np.ma.convolve:
> >
> > https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/7922
> >
On Fr, 2016-10-14 at 13:00 -0400, Allan Haldane wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Eric Wieser has a PR which defines new functions np.ma.correlate and
> np.ma.convolve:
>
> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/7922
>
> We're deciding how to name the keyword arg which determines whether
> masked elements are "
15 matches
Mail list logo