[Nunit-core] [Bug 719187] Re: Using Path.GetTempPath() causes conflicts in shared temporary folders

2012-01-24 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:nunit-3.0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of NUnit Core Developers, which is the registrant for NUnit Framework. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719187 Title: Using Path.GetTempPath() causes conflicts in shared temporary folders Status in NU

[Nunit-core] [Bug 719187] Re: Using Path.GetTempPath() causes conflicts in shared temporary folders

2012-01-24 Thread Charlie Poole
Shadow copy cache is now in user local application data. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of NUnit Core Developers, which is the registrant for NUnit Framework. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719187 Title: Using Path.GetTempPath() causes conflicts in shared tempo

[Nunit-core] [Bug 719187] Re: Using Path.GetTempPath() causes conflicts in shared temporary folders

2012-01-24 Thread Charlie Poole
** Changed in: nunit-3.0 Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of NUnit Core Developers, which is the registrant for NUnit Framework. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719187 Title: Using Path.GetTempPath() causes conflicts in shar

[Nunit-core] [Bug 498690] Re: Assert.That() doesn't like properties with scoped setters

2012-01-24 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:nunitv2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of NUnit Core Developers, which is the registrant for NUnit Framework. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/498690 Title: Assert.That() doesn't like properties with scoped setters Status in NUnit Test Frame

[Nunit-core] [Bug 498690] Re: Assert.That() doesn't like properties with scoped setters

2012-01-24 Thread Charlie Poole
I added Assert.ByVal methods equivalent to Assert.That, but without the offending overload. Note that there is no equivalent in the AssertionHelper syntax (Expect) so you have to use Assert.ByVal if the problem applies. ** Changed in: nunitv2 Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You receiv

[Nunit-core] [Bug 919876] Re: NUnit.Util.Transform.resources missing from nunit.util.dll

2012-01-24 Thread Charlie Poole
** Changed in: nunitv2 Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of NUnit Developers, which is subscribed to NUnit V2. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/919876 Title: NUnit.Util.Transform.resources missing from nunit.util.dll Status i

[Nunit-core] [Bug 919876] Re: NUnit.Util.Transform.resources missing from nunit.util.dll

2012-01-24 Thread Charlie Poole
OK, I'm restoring the embedded resource to the NAnt build for 2.6. Regarding 3.0, I'll drop you a note offline. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of NUnit Developers, which is subscribed to NUnit V2. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/919876 Title: NUnit.Util.Transfo

[Nunit-core] [Bug 919876] Re: NUnit.Util.Transform.resources missing from nunit.util.dll

2012-01-24 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:nunitv2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of NUnit Developers, which is subscribed to NUnit V2. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/919876 Title: NUnit.Util.Transform.resources missing from nunit.util.dll Status in NUnit V2 Test Framework: Fix C

[Nunit-core] [Bug 919876] Re: NUnit.Util.Transform.resources missing from nunit.util.dll

2012-01-24 Thread Ryan Boggs
Much appreciated Charlie. Thanks for your time and effort. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of NUnit Developers, which is subscribed to NUnit V2. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/919876 Title: NUnit.Util.Transform.resources missing from nunit.util.dll Status in N

[Nunit-core] [Bug 919876] Re: NUnit.Util.Transform.resources missing from nunit.util.dll

2012-01-24 Thread Ryan Boggs
It would be great if you kept the embed for 2.6 as it was (in nunit.util.dll) and completely remove it for 3.0. I think it would make sense to go that route but in the end, it's your call. Another point, I'm thinking that once nunit 3.0 start up (ie: releases for this branch start coming out), we

[Nunit-core] [Bug 919876] Re: NUnit.Util.Transform.resources missing from nunit.util.dll

2012-01-24 Thread Charlie Poole
Additional FYI... The Visual Studio build of NUnit still embeds the file, so I want to change either it or the NAnt script to be consistent. Charlie -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of NUnit Developers, which is subscribed to NUnit V2. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu

[Nunit-core] [Bug 919876] Re: NUnit.Util.Transform.resources missing from nunit.util.dll

2012-01-24 Thread Charlie Poole
Since you are already distributing some NUnit assemblies with NAnt, no new license issues are introduced if you take the transform file and embed it yourself. I assume NAnt includes the NUnit license file somewhere. OTOH, since NUnit 2.6 is really the end of the line, it would do no harm to keep t

[Nunit-core] [Bug 498690] Re: Assert.That() doesn't like properties with scoped setters

2012-01-24 Thread Chad Kittel
Thank you for not abandoning it. I'm no longer affected by this personally, because I have moved on to a different team, using a different technology (C#). That said, the team I left is still constrained by this limitation of course. I too really like Option #3, even if it's a pollution an other

[Nunit-core] [Bug 919876] Re: NUnit.Util.Transform.resources missing from nunit.util.dll

2012-01-24 Thread Ryan Boggs
Hi, I see where you are going with this and it does make sense. That being said, I am kinda in a pickle. After further investigation, I realized that NAnt gives the user the opportunity to provide custom xslt files to format NUnit's output when the formatter for the nunit2 task is set to plain.

[Nunit-core] [Bug 498690] Re: Assert.That() doesn't like properties with scoped setters

2012-01-24 Thread Charlie Poole
I'm revisiting this old bug to see if anything has changed and to try to resolve it one way or the other for the final NUnit 2.x release. At the same time, I'll answer the last (very old) post, which I seem to have missed when it appeared. Recapping the bug status: VB generates code to call the ov

[Nunit-core] [Bug 613727] Re: Add OSArchitecture Attribute to Environment node in result xml

2012-01-24 Thread Charlie Poole
** Tags added: feature framework -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of NUnit Core Developers, which is the registrant for NUnit Framework. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/613727 Title: Add OSArchitecture Attribute to Environment node in result xml Status in NUnit T

[Nunit-core] [Bug 919876] Re: NUnit.Util.Transform.resources missing from nunit.util.dll

2012-01-24 Thread Charlie Poole
** Changed in: nunitv2 Milestone: None => 2.6.0rc -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of NUnit Developers, which is subscribed to NUnit V2. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/919876 Title: NUnit.Util.Transform.resources missing from nunit.util.dll Status in NUnit V

[Nunit-core] [Bug 740304] Re: teardown performance memory

2012-01-24 Thread Charlie Poole
** Tags removed: testcontext ** Tags added: feature framework -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of NUnit Core Developers, which is the registrant for NUnit Framework. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740304 Title: teardown performance memory Status in NUnit Test Fr

[Nunit-core] [Bug 719187] Re: Using Path.GetTempPath() causes conflicts in shared temporary folders

2012-01-24 Thread Charlie Poole
This should be fixed in DomainManager.cs, the only place we use Path.GetTempPath() ** Changed in: nunit-3.0 Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: nunit-3.0 Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: nunit-3.0 Assignee: (unassigned) => Charlie Poole (charlie.poole) ** Changed in

[Nunit-core] [Bug 901212] Re: Feature request: Generic constraint model

2012-01-24 Thread Charlie Poole
** Tags added: feature framework -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of NUnit Core Developers, which is the registrant for NUnit Framework. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/901212 Title: Feature request: Generic constraint model Status in NUnit Test Framework: New

[Nunit-core] [Bug 917590] Re: Combination of Repeat attribute and TestCase attribute not working.

2012-01-24 Thread Charlie Poole
** Tags added: feature framework -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of NUnit Core Developers, which is the registrant for NUnit Framework. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/917590 Title: Combination of Repeat attribute and TestCase attribute not working. Status in NU

[Nunit-core] [Bug 910189] Re: Eliminate NUnit Configuration Section in config file

2012-01-24 Thread Charlie Poole
** Changed in: nunitv2 Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: nunitv2 Milestone: None => 2.6.0rc -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of NUnit Developers, which is subscribed to NUnit V2. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/910189 Title: Eliminate NUnit C

[Nunit-core] [Bug 920472] Re: CollectionAssert.IsNotEmpty must dispose Enumerator

2012-01-24 Thread Charlie Poole
** Changed in: nunitv2 Milestone: None => 2.6.0rc -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of NUnit Core Developers, which is the registrant for NUnit Framework. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/920472 Title: CollectionAssert.IsNotEmpty must dispose Enumerator Status

[Nunit-core] [Bug 919876] Re: NUnit.Util.Transform.resources missing from nunit.util.dll

2012-01-24 Thread Charlie Poole
** Changed in: nunitv2 Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: nunitv2 Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: nunitv2 Assignee: (unassigned) => Charlie Poole (charlie.poole) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of NUnit Developers, which is subscribed

[Nunit-core] [Bug 655057] Re: Can't debug in VS2010 for prokects built with .NET 4

2012-01-24 Thread Charlie Poole
This bug appears to have been filed against NUnit 3.0 in error, since it references NUnit 2.5.7. I'm changing it to the NUnitV2 project so it's in the right place. The bug is also a "Won't Fix" since it is caused by the fact that nunit.exe has to start a separate process to run the tests under .N