2008/5/19 Michel Bouissou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Carlos Rodrigues a écrit :
>>
>> Pretty darn weird, I say. But if the 2.2.2 version doesn't work, I can
>> try adding that to see if it works.
>
> I have checked and the 2.2.2 version doesn't yet exist as an Ubuntu nor
> Debian package, so I will hav
> By the way, is it possible to force usbhid-ups to pretend that a given
> USB device is another device? That is, force it to ignore the vendor
> and manufacturer strings and use instead the ones supplied from the
> command line?
That's generally useless, since 'usbhid-ups' only works for device
> The problems with the battery charge calculation have been discussed
> before in this list, and I'm starting to agree with (I don't remember
> exactly who, sorry) who tried to convice me that having any kind of
> charge calculation was a bad idea.
That was me.
> I'm thinking if the charge calcu
Arnaud Quette a écrit :
>
> You have two choices there:
> - use the 2.2.2 from Debian Sid once it has passed the new queue (may
> take some time since there are 3 new packages), which should work with
> HH
> - use the 2.2.2 source, "ln -s packaging/debian && debuild -us -uc"
I will either try to
Hi Arjen,
Arjen de Korte a écrit :
>
> It may appear to be working for you, but only now. As soon as load,
> temperature and/or battery age (!) change, the calculation will be off
> (and more often than not by a landslide). The only way to accurately
> measure the amount of charge in battery [...
>> It may appear to be working for you, but only now. As soon as load,
>> temperature and/or battery age (!) change, the calculation will be off
>> (and more often than not by a landslide). The only way to accurately
>> measure the amount of charge in battery [...]
> I get the point, but actually d
Hi,
I'm just looking at the code of snmp-ups driver in the source tree.
I'm trying to find out, what can I change in the code to force the
snmp-ups driver to send shutdown command to the upsd to shutdown the
computer when I set up on the UPS via telnet that it should restart
gracefully.
The com
> I'm just looking at the code of snmp-ups driver in the source tree.
> I'm trying to find out, what can I change in the code to force the
> snmp-ups driver to send shutdown command to the upsd to shutdown the
> computer when I set up on the UPS via telnet that it should restart
> gracefully.
The
Hi again,
The PGP sig for 2.2.2 is missing from
http://eu1.networkupstools.org/source/2.2/ (so the corresponding link
from the download page is broken).
Also, for the record, I'm trying to compile 2.2.2 from sources and so
far, on my Ubuntu Hardy system :
- If I don't use during configure "--wit
Den Tuesday 20 May 2008 03.21.22 skrev Charles Lepple:
> On May 19, 2008, at 6:27 PM, David Mathog wrote:
> > No idea why it thinks it is a Liebert.
>
> It's only looking at the USB vendor ID, and the only Liebert USB UPS
> that we heard about had that vendor ID. (Then again, these may be
> complet
As suggested, the megatec_usb driver was attempted. ups.conf has:
driver = megatec_usb
port = auto
desc = "Top Maruson UPS"
Unfortunately, both as ups (the account created when nut was
compiled/installed) and as root, this is what happens:
% /usr/local/src/nut-2.2.2/dr
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Kjell Claesson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Den Tuesday 20 May 2008 03.21.22 skrev Charles Lepple:
>> On May 19, 2008, at 6:27 PM, David Mathog wrote:
>> > No idea why it thinks it is a Liebert.
>>
>> It's only looking at the USB vendor ID, and the only Liebert USB
On Tue, 20 May 2008 22:10:59 +0400, David Mathog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As suggested, the megatec_usb driver was attempted. ups.conf has:
>
> driver = megatec_usb
> port = auto
> desc = "Top Maruson UPS"
>
>
> Unfortunately, both as ups (the account created when nut was
>
>> As suggested, the megatec_usb driver was attempted. ups.conf has:
>>
>> driver = megatec_usb
>> port = auto
>> desc = "Top Maruson UPS"
>>
>>
>> Unfortunately, both as ups (the account created when nut was
>> compiled/installed) and as root, this is what happens:
>>
>>
> [snip]
>
On Tue, 20 May 2008 23:34:13 +0400, Arjen de Korte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> Q1 detail: (14 bytes) => 28 31 31 33 2e 39 20 31 30 30 31 30 30 30
>> [snip]
>>
>> Good so far!
>>
>> If you print these numbers as ASCII text you'll get:
>> "(113.9 1001000"
>> This looks like some weird m
> - if the trunk doesn't work any better it could be helpful to sniff
> USB traffic while using supplied Windows driver
Yeah, I'm thinking that would be useful too.
What (free) software do you folks use for this?
Thanks,
David Mathog
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manager, Sequence Analysis Facility, Biol
On Tue, 20 May 2008 23:51:28 +0400, David Mathog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> - if the trunk doesn't work any better it could be helpful to sniff
>> USB traffic while using supplied Windows driver
>
> Yeah, I'm thinking that would be useful too.
> What (free) software do you folks use for this?
Here is the USB snoop of the data going to/from the UPS.
It was made the following way:
1. get usb snoop configured, plug in UPS so that a device appeared
in the applications list, unplug UPS.
2. select UPS USB device and click "install" in usb snoop to start logging.
3. plug in the USB cable
On Wed, 21 May 2008 02:22:17 +0400, David Mathog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is the USB snoop of the data going to/from the UPS.
> It was made the following way:
>
> 1. get usb snoop configured, plug in UPS so that a device appeared
> in the applications list, unplug UPS.
> 2. select UPS U
Le mardi 20 mai 2008, Arjen de Korte a écrit :
>
> No, you don't get the point.
> Like I explained, what you're doing now (or with any other scheme that is
> based on battery voltage alone) may seem to work now, but may (will) fail
> horribly [...]
> In NUT we have 'upssched' for situations where t
20 matches
Mail list logo