[Nut-upsuser] SNMPv3 fails when more than one UPS is configured in ups.conf

2017-11-30 Thread Lee Damon
New NUT install dealing with three APC Smart-UPS 5000s, two of which have AP9617 and the third has a AP9619 card. The SNMPv3 configurations on all three are exactly the same. This is confirmed by snmpget calls that work just fine: snmpget -Cf -v3 -u [...] -l authPriv -A '[...]' -X '[...]'

Re: [Nut-upsuser] SNMPv3 fails when more than one UPS is configured in ups.conf

2017-12-04 Thread Lee Damon
The start-up result is done. Dec 04 10:17:52 [redacted] systemd[1]: Unit nut-driver.service is not needed anymore. Stopping. I have a feeling that if I do get this working by setting huge timers I'm just cargo-culting a "fix". nomad On 12/4/17 09:38 , Lee Damon wrote: > Hi Charles

Re: [Nut-upsuser] SNMPv3 fails when more than one UPS is configured in ups.conf

2017-12-04 Thread Lee Damon
I have it "working" with the following settings changes from the default in the RPM. By "working" I mean it starts after reboot and after issuing 'sudo systemctl restart nut-driver' but, as expected, it takes quite a while to finish startup.

Re: [Nut-upsuser] SNMPv3 fails when more than one UPS is configured in ups.conf

2017-12-04 Thread Lee Damon
3/17 14:34 , Charles Lepple wrote: > On Nov 30, 2017, at 6:31 PM, Lee Damon <no...@ee.washington.edu> wrote: >> >> SNMPv3 works fine when I have any one of the three configured in >> ups.conf while the other two are configured with SNMPv1. It doesn't >> matter which _on

Re: [Nut-upsuser] SNMPv3 fails when more than one UPS is configured in ups.conf

2017-12-05 Thread Lee Damon
>How close do the EPEL RPM's systemd configuration files look to the ones in the NUT tree? The only difference between /lib/systemd/system/nut-driver.service and the one at  https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/blob/v2.7.2/scripts/systemd/nut-driver.service.in (not counting variable

Re: [Nut-upsuser] SNMPv3 fails when more than one UPS is configured in ups.conf

2017-12-05 Thread Lee Damon
One thing I just noticed, all of the COMBAD and COMOK messages are about the same UPS, the other two seem to be fine. nomad On 12/5/17 08:24 , Lee Damon wrote: ... > I suspect there's a deeper problem here. This morning I came in to 22 > emails about COMBAD and 22 emails about COMOK from