Charles Lepple writes:
I don't currently have a physical Fedora test system, but can you see if
this works at least as well as it did prior to the libusb-1.0 branch? (I
have a few kludges in my tree to make this work on a Raspberry Pi, but they
are not ready to push.)
https://github.com/n
>
>> # nut-scanner
>> Cannot load USB library (/usr/lib64/libusb-1.0.so.0.1.0) :
>> /usr/lib64/libusb-1.0.so.0.1.0: undefined symbol: usb_get_string_simple. USB
>> search disabled.
>
> Although I suspect that the USB portion of nut-scanner could probably be
> replaced with a small shell script
On Nov 26, 2017, at 3:15 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>
> Charles Lepple writes:
>
>> still looking for volunteers to test the libusb-1.0 code on FreeBSD and
>> other systems.
>
> On Fedora 27, running commit 2999c95f0:
Thanks for checking this. I should have been more clear in the second email
Charles Lepple writes:
still looking for volunteers to test the libusb-1.0 code on FreeBSD and
other systems.
On Fedora 27, running commit 2999c95f0:
# nut-scanner
Cannot load USB library (/usr/lib64/libusb-1.0.so.0.1.0) :
/usr/lib64/libusb-1.0.so.0.1.0: undefined symbol: usb_get_string_si
On Nov 22, 2017, at 7:39 PM, Charles Lepple wrote:
>
> The new branch will only attach to the device if I pass the '-u root' flag to
> usbhid-ups.
fixed: https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/compare/dfd514e...80bc452
still looking for volunteers to test the libusb-1.0 code on FreeBSD and oth
5 matches
Mail list logo