[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-133?page=comments#action_12359564 ]
Lutischán Ferenc commented on NUTCH-133:
Dear Stephan,
Please see http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-123.
This problem is also problem in cached.jsp.
Regards,
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-133?page=comments#action_12359603 ]
Chris A. Mattmann commented on NUTCH-133:
-
Just another comment on the issue. The reported bug listed as the following:
Problem:
Actually the configuration of parser
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-133?page=comments#action_12359610 ]
Stefan Groschupf commented on NUTCH-133:
Jerome:
Since 3 months or so url extentions and also magic content type detection is
never used. I suggest to assign this
This should work. TestRPC.java has a case which returns void (ping).
Can you send a simple test case that fails?
Doug
Stefan Groschupf wrote:
Hi,
I never used the RCP that intensive so I was surprised to found this
limitation.
Is it known that the RCP.call method can only call methods that
Sure...
the test case:
###
package org.apache.nutch.ipc;
import java.lang.reflect.Method;
import java.net.InetSocketAddress;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
public class TestMultiCall extends TestCase {
private Server fServer;
public TestMultiCall() {
fServer =
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-133?page=comments#action_12359624 ]
Doug Cutting commented on NUTCH-133:
It would be great to have some junit tests which illustrate these problems. If
we can first all agree on the desired behaviour, then
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-134?page=comments#action_12359626 ]
Doug Cutting commented on NUTCH-134:
Can we yet replace Nutch's summarizer with the summarizer in Lucene's contrib
directory? Are there features that Nutch requires that
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-133?page=comments#action_12359627 ]
Stefan Groschupf commented on NUTCH-133:
Doug, I already attached a unit test that call ParseUtil.parse(Content) and
simulate the different scenarios.
I can extend the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-134?page=comments#action_12359629 ]
Andrzej Bialecki commented on NUTCH-134:
-
I _think_ the Lucene summarizer requires more CPU than this one... but this has
to be checked. I'll work on that.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-133?page=comments#action_12359634 ]
Doug Cutting commented on NUTCH-133:
Stefan, sorry I missed the test case.
If others agree that these cases should pass, then we should commit the test
case alone as a
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-133?page=comments#action_12359645 ]
Chris A. Mattmann commented on NUTCH-133:
-
Hi Stefan,
Thanks for your reply. I actually like a lot of your proposed changes having
to do with the MimeType cleansing
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-133?page=comments#action_12359647 ]
Jerome Charron commented on NUTCH-133:
--
Stefan:
1. url extentions and also magic content type detection are used. This is the
only way protocol-file and protocol-ftp can
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-134?page=comments#action_12359649 ]
byron miller commented on NUTCH-134:
I would take more cpu for better summaries any day :) cpu power is cheaper than
manual intervention!
If any testing is needed, don't
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-133?page=comments#action_12359679 ]
Chris A. Mattmann commented on NUTCH-133:
-
Hi Doug,
I like this idea for the getContentType method. In general, I completely agree
that the server provided content
Guys
My fault! I miss copying the segments dir. Sorry for that. Pls ignore
this messgae.
/Jack
On 12/8/05, Jack Tang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All
Currently I update my nutch from 0.7 to 0.8-dev (svn version) and come
across one question on searcher.
I wrote my own indexer and searcher
15 matches
Mail list logo
