My opinion is neutral on this matter. I don't see any technical benefit
from going to top level project, exposure-wise I think the impact is
probably negative. So for me the reason would be strictly political.
But the fact is that Nutch is pretty independent from Lucene/Solr and
there is not m
On Mar 20, 2010, at 11:25 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> Personally, I don't see the advantage of Nutch going for a TLP.
I think it comes down to focus. Nutch really isn't all that dependent on
Lucene and there is almost no overlap with the other communities in terms of
the people developing
o: "nutch-dev@lucene.apache.org"
>Sent: Sat, March 20, 2010 7:30:54 PM
>Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Nutch as a top level project (TLP)?
>
>Hey Andrzej,
>
>>I’d be +1 for Nutch being a TLP. I don’t think it’ll change much (other than
>>to provide more visibility/etc.,
Hey Andrzej,
I'd be +1 for Nutch being a TLP. I don't think it'll change much (other than to
provide more visibility/etc., and to allow more focused decision making by the
folks in the Nutch community). The infrastructure moves required to move to TLP
status are moving mailing lists, moving JIR
Hi devs,
The ASF Board indicated recently that so called "umbrella" projects,
i.e. projects that host many significant sub-projects, should examine
their structure towards simplification, such as merging or splitting out
sub-projects.
Lucene TLP is such a project. Recently the Lucene PMC acc