[jira] Commented: (NUTCH-169) remove static NutchConf

2006-01-31 Thread Andrzej Bialecki (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-169?page=comments#action_12364544 ] Andrzej Bialecki commented on NUTCH-169: - This patch looks good! If there are no further objections, I'll test it and commit it within the next 12 hours. remove

Re: [jira] Commented: (NUTCH-169) remove static NutchConf

2006-01-31 Thread Sami Siren
Andrzej Bialecki (JIRA) wrote: [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-169?page=comments#action_12364544 ] Andrzej Bialecki commented on NUTCH-169: - This patch looks good! If there are no further objections, I'll test it and commit it within

Re: [jira] Commented: (NUTCH-169) remove static NutchConf

2006-01-31 Thread Stefan Groschupf
Well, it was at least the best way we had seen, since NutchConfigured require to implement a constructor that in most cases was unused as well, since most classes are instantiated class.newInstance(). So both solutions was optimal, and we decide for the interface solution. I'm pretty sure

Re: [jira] Commented: (NUTCH-169) remove static NutchConf

2006-01-31 Thread Andrzej Bialecki
Sami Siren wrote: Andrzej Bialecki (JIRA) wrote: [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-169?page=comments#action_12364544 ] Andrzej Bialecki commented on NUTCH-169: - This patch looks good! If there are no further objections, I'll test it

[jira] Commented: (NUTCH-169) remove static NutchConf

2006-01-18 Thread Andrzej Bialecki (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-169?page=comments#action_12363114 ] Andrzej Bialecki commented on NUTCH-169: - I noticed only minor issues in this patch, here's the list (all line numbers below refer to the line numbers in the patch

[jira] Commented: (NUTCH-169) remove static NutchConf

2006-01-18 Thread Stefan Groschupf (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-169?page=comments#action_12363116 ] Stefan Groschupf commented on NUTCH-169: Thanks, we will fix this in the beginning of next week. remove static NutchConf --- Key:

[jira] Commented: (NUTCH-169) remove static NutchConf

2006-01-11 Thread Andrzej Bialecki (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-169?page=comments#action_12362438 ] Andrzej Bialecki commented on NUTCH-169: - Overall, good work! I have some comments regarding the details: * I wonder what is the performance impact of this patch - in

[jira] Commented: (NUTCH-169) remove static NutchConf

2006-01-11 Thread Stefan Groschupf (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-169?page=comments#action_12362447 ] Stefan Groschupf commented on NUTCH-169: I wonder what is the performance impact of this patch - in many places, where previously we used the static methods on classes

[jira] Commented: (NUTCH-169) remove static NutchConf

2006-01-10 Thread Stefan Groschupf (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-169?page=comments#action_12362334 ] Stefan Groschupf commented on NUTCH-169: I missed to mentioned that is the first version just for discussing and provide Jerome the changed API it is not the final

[jira] Commented: (NUTCH-169) remove static NutchConf

2006-01-10 Thread Stefan Groschupf (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-169?page=comments#action_12362393 ] Stefan Groschupf commented on NUTCH-169: Great! Thanks a lot Jerome!!! We will continue to fix some smaller bugs we introduced and JobConf related issue and hopefully