No objections form me. We waited long and we can fix things in
maitenance release in few weeks.
Regards
Piotr
On 7/26/06, Sami Siren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
Sami Siren wrote:
There is a package available for testing in
http://people.apache.org/~siren/nutch-0.8/
Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
Sami Siren wrote:
There is a package available for testing in
http://people.apache.org/~siren/nutch-0.8/
please give it some testing and post in your opinion - is it good
enough to be a public release?
I have some doubts because of NUTCH-266, but so far only 3
I will start working on the 0.8 release on next moday or tuesday. If
there are no surprises I will post another message when package is
available for testing.
--
Sami Siren
Doug Cutting wrote:
+1
Piotr Kosiorowski wrote:
+1.
P.
Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
Sami Siren wrote:
How would folks
Subject: Re: 0.8 release
+1, but I really would love to see NUTCH-293 as part of nutch .8
since this all about being more polite.
Thanks.
Stefan
On 05.07.2006, at 03:46, Doug Cutting wrote:
+1
Piotr Kosiorowski wrote:
+1.
P.
Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
Sami Siren wrote:
How would
+1, but I really would love to see NUTCH-293 as part of nutch .8
since this all about being more polite.
Thanks.
Stefan
On 05.07.2006, at 03:46, Doug Cutting wrote:
+1
Piotr Kosiorowski wrote:
+1.
P.
Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
Sami Siren wrote:
How would folks feel about releasing 0.8 now,
+1.
P.
Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
Sami Siren wrote:
How would folks feel about releasing 0.8 now, there has been quite a
lot of improvements/new features
since 0.7 series and I strongly feel that we should push the first 0.8
series release (alfa/beta)
out the door now. It would IMO lower the
Hi,
Is there a real chance that NUTCH-273 would be fixed soon (let's say
once 0.8 is relased)?
Lukas
On 6/10/06, Andrzej Bialecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sami Siren wrote:
How would folks feel about releasing 0.8 now, there has been quite a
lot of improvements/new features
since 0.7 series
Sami Siren wrote:
How would folks feel about releasing 0.8 now, there has been quite a
lot of improvements/new features
since 0.7 series and I strongly feel that we should push the first 0.8
series release (alfa/beta)
out the door now. It would IMO lower the barrier to first timers try
the 0.8
How would folks feel about releasing 0.8 now, there has been quite a lot
of improvements/new features
since 0.7 series and I strongly feel that we should push the first 0.8
series release (alfa/beta)
out the door now. It would IMO lower the barrier to first timers try the
0.8 series and that
to cygwin
and it looks ok. I will try to commit it today/tommorow.
Regards
Piotr
On 4/12/06, Chris Mattmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Guys,
Any progress on the 0.8 release? Was there any resolution about
which JIRA
issues to complete before the 0.8 release? We had a bit of conversation
(my linux
environment looks not to be setu correctly) - but I switched to cygwin
and it looks ok. I will try to commit it today/tommorow.
Regards
Piotr
On 4/12/06, Chris Mattmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Guys,
Any progress on the 0.8 release? Was there any resolution about
which JIRA
issues
Hi Guys,
Any progress on the 0.8 release? Was there any resolution about which JIRA
issues to complete before the 0.8 release? We had a bit of conversation
there and some ideas, but no definitive answer...
Thanks for your help, and sorry to pester ;)
Cheers,
Chris
on the 0.8 release? Was there any resolution about which JIRA
issues to complete before the 0.8 release? We had a bit of conversation
there and some ideas, but no definitive answer...
Thanks for your help, and sorry to pester ;)
Cheers,
Chris
__
Chris
Chris Mattmann wrote:
+1 for a release sooner rather than later.
I think this is a good plan. There's no reason we can't do another
release in a month. If it is back-compatbible we can call it 0.8.x and
if it's incompatible we can call it 0.9.0.
I'm going to make a Hadoop 0.1.1 release
+1
On 4/7/06 10:20 AM, Doug Cutting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Mattmann wrote:
+1 for a release sooner rather than later.
I think this is a good plan. There's no reason we can't do another
release in a month. If it is back-compatbible we can call it 0.8.x and
if it's incompatible
Doug Cutting wrote:
Piotr, would you like to make this release, or should I?
I would prefer you would do it this time - I am not sure if I can find
some time next week. I would like to do some things before release though:
1) Commit clustering patch from Dawid (I took it over from Andrzej).
Doug Cutting wrote:
Chris Mattmann wrote:
+1 for a release sooner rather than later.
I think this is a good plan. There's no reason we can't do another
release in a month. If it is back-compatbible we can call it 0.8.x
and if it's incompatible we can call it 0.9.0.
I'm going to make a
Hi Andrzej,
On 4/7/06 12:18 PM, Andrzej Bialecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you guys have any additional insights / suggestions whether NUTCH-240
and/or NUTCH-61 should be included in this release?
Looking at the JIRA popular issues pane for Nutch (
in the 0.8 release...
Regards
Jérôme
--
http://motrech.free.fr/
http://www.frutch.org/
Chris Mattmann wrote:
opinion, I recently downloaded and reviewed NUTCH-61, and really like the
patch. +1 on my end. I haven't tried out NUTCH-240 yet, but it seems to be a
logical extension point for Nutch to be able to plug in different scoring
components. So, +1 from me.
Thanks for
TDLN wrote:
I mean, how do others keep uptodate with the main codeline? Do you
advice updating everyday?
Should we make a 0.8.0 release soon? What features are still missing
that we'd like to get into this release?
Doug
Doug Cutting wrote:
TDLN wrote:
I mean, how do others keep uptodate with the main codeline? Do you
advice updating everyday?
Should we make a 0.8.0 release soon? What features are still missing
that we'd like to get into this release?
I think we should make a release soon - instabilities
+1 for a release sooner rather than later. Several interesting features
contributed since the 0.7 branch I believe are now tested and
production-worthy, at least in my environment. Hats off to the folks who
were able to split the MapReduce and NDFS into Hadoop -- I'm going to be
experimenting with
23 matches
Mail list logo
