Nutch Newbie wrote:
Again not really proposing a new project but more easy to use
re-usable code. IMHO, Nutch will be an umbrella project for
ala-Google and Solr will be for ala-Enterpise where Lucene
is the index lib, Hadoop is the Mapred/DFS lib ..what is missing is
Common Crawler lib, Common
Otis,
Some time ago people on the list said that they are willing to at
least maintain Nutch 0.7 branch. As a committer (not very active
recently) I volunteered to commit patches when they appear - I do not
have enough time at the moment to do active coding. I have created a
7.3 release in JIRA
On 1/22/07, Otis Gospodnetic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've been meaning to write this message for a while, and Andrzej's
StrategicGoals made me compose it, finally.
Nutch 0.8 and beyond is very cool, very powerful, and once Hadoop stabilizes,
it will be even more valuable than it is
Hello,
I'm writing this on behalf of both Armel Nene and myself.
We think that you and those who have responded have a point. We've been
experiencing quite a number of problems with getting Nutch 0.8 adapted for
our needs, and making changes to support evolving business requirements as
they
2007/1/22, Otis Gospodnetic [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I've been meaning to write this message for a while, and Andrzej's
StrategicGoals made me compose it, finally.
Nutch 0.8 and beyond is very cool, very powerful, and once Hadoop
stabilizes, it will be even more valuable than it is today.
Before doubling (or after 0.9.0 tripling?) the maintenance/development work
please consider the following:
One option would be re factoring the code in a way that the parts that are
usable to other projects like protocols?, parsers (this actually was
proposed by
Jukka Zitting some time
Chris Mattmann wrote:
In any case, I think that, if we are going to maintain separate branches of
the source, in fact, really parallel projects, then an undertaking such as
Tika is properly needed ...
I still don't think we need separate project to start with, IMO right
mode of mind is enough
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, certainly, anything that can be shared and decoupled from pieces that make
each branch (not SVN/CVS branch) different, should be decoupled. But I was
really curious about whether people think this is a valid idea/direction, not
necessarily immediately how things
On 1/22/07, Doug Cutting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Finally, web crawling, indexing and searching are data-intensive.
Before long, users will want to index tens or hundreds of millions of
pages. Distributed operation is soon required at this scale, and
batch-mode is an order-of-magnitude
