Re: [nvo3] Enhancing Virtual Network Encapsulation with IPv6

2014-09-08 Thread Mark ZZZ Smith
Hi Tom, - Original Message - From: Tom Herbert therb...@google.com To: Mark ZZZ Smith markzzzsm...@yahoo.com.au Cc: nvo3@ietf.org nvo3@ietf.org Sent: Saturday, 6 September 2014, 7:55 Subject: Re: [nvo3] Enhancing Virtual Network Encapsulation with IPv6 On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at

Re: [nvo3] Enhancing Virtual Network Encapsulation with IPv6

2014-09-08 Thread Tom Herbert
I'm not sure how practical this is. There's already deployment to use the flow label as representative of inner flow (like for ECMP hashing, etc.). Is this use in the flow label fields of the outer IPv6 packets when they're the encapsulation protocol between NVEs in the underlay network?

Re: [nvo3] Multicast issues draft

2014-09-08 Thread Thomas Narten
If, as you suggest, multicast is already within scope because we haven't explicitly excluded it, then I'm fine with the charter text. Of course multicast is already within scope for the WG. I find myself scratching my head a bit that anyone thinks that it might not be, and that wording needs

Re: [nvo3] Last Call for Comments on Proposed Charter

2014-09-08 Thread Thomas Narten
Hi Benson. Thanks for the updated charter. Here are some possible wording clarifications. I do not believe the change the charter in a material way (and are not intended to). But they may make aspects of it a bit clearer.

Re: [nvo3] Last Call for Comments on Proposed Charter

2014-09-08 Thread Lucy yong
Thomas, Some Comments: A Network Virtualization Edge (NVE) that sits at the edge of an underlay network and provides L2 and/or L3 network virtualization functions to Tenant Systems Comment: If NVE resides on a Server that is a host in an underlay network, IMO: this is not the case that

Re: [nvo3] Last Call for Comments on Proposed Charter

2014-09-08 Thread Lucy yong
If Server has an interface to underlay network, I am not sure if we can call the server as the edge of underlay network. NVE is the edge of a virtual network. Lucy -Original Message- From: Thomas Narten [mailto:nar...@us.ibm.com] Sent: Monday, September 08, 2014 4:15 PM To: Lucy

Re: [nvo3] Last Call for Comments on Proposed Charter

2014-09-08 Thread Lucy yong
We need move forward on the framework and live with this statement. Lucy -Original Message- From: Thomas Narten [mailto:nar...@us.ibm.com] Sent: Monday, September 08, 2014 5:10 PM To: Lucy yong Cc: Benson Schliesser; nvo3@ietf.org Subject: Re: [nvo3] Last Call for Comments on Proposed

Re: [nvo3] Last Call for Comments on Proposed Charter

2014-09-08 Thread Sharon Barkai
One last try to split this nose hair: NVA: Find logically centralized replace with logically distinguished a service defined by the NVE-NVA interface (and not by implementation eg BGP, DHT, X500..) The NVO3 WG will develop solutions for network virtualization based on the following