On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Larry Kreeger (kreeger)
kree...@cisco.comwrote:
I see that a healthy discussion has broken out around
draft-gross-geneve-00 which I see has a slot in the agenda for the NVO3 WG
meeting on Monday. Here are my thoughts.
I will be comparing Geneve to an
elsewhere.
Just my 2c.
-Phil
From: Pankaj Garg garg.pan...@microsoft.com
Date: Sunday, March 2, 2014 at 2:06 PM
To: Larry Kreeger (kreeger) kree...@cisco.com, nvo3@ietf.org
nvo3@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [nvo3] Comments on Draft Geneve
My responses are inline marked with PG.
From: Larry
Subject: RE: Comments on Draft Geneve
My comments are inline marked with [PG].
From: nvo3 [mailto:nvo3-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Larry Kreeger (kreeger)
Sent: Saturday, March 1, 2014 3:28 AM
To: nvo3@ietf.orgmailto:nvo3@ietf.org
Subject: [nvo3] Comments on Draft Geneve
I see that a healthy
[mailto:nvo3-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Larry Kreeger (kreeger)
Sent: Saturday, March 1, 2014 3:28 AM
To: nvo3@ietf.orgmailto:nvo3@ietf.org
Subject: [nvo3] Comments on Draft Geneve
I see that a healthy discussion has broken out around draft-gross-geneve-00
which I see has a slot in the agenda
...@cisco.com, nvo3@ietf.org
nvo3@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [nvo3] Comments on Draft Geneve
My responses are inline marked with PG.
From: Larry Kreeger (kreeger) [mailto:kree...@cisco.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 2, 2014 9:16 PM
To: Pankaj Garg; nvo3@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Comments on Draft Geneve
My
I see that a healthy discussion has broken out around draft-gross-geneve-00
which I see has a slot in the agenda for the NVO3 WG meeting on Monday. Here
are my thoughts.
I will be comparing Geneve to an encapsulation that is near and dear to my
heart, VXLAN. When I do this, I see an
So Larry, earlier in the month I asked the chairs if nvo3 was ready to talk and
explore solutions. The answer was no.
Then why is GENEVE on the agenda chairs?
Dino
On Feb 28, 2014, at 1:57 PM, Larry Kreeger (kreeger) kree...@cisco.com
wrote:
I see that a healthy discussion has broken
