much
> effort to list 2 addresses for those wanting to use their local sites and
> still get the word out to a wider audience when a rarity shows up.
>
> But maybe to Paul's point a strictly RBA site state wide would address the
> issue. But someone would have to take responsibilit
day, November 21, 2016 1:19 PM
To: Paul R Sweet
Cc: nysbirds-l
Subject: Re: [ebirdsnyc] Re: [nysbirds-l] Brooklyn Ash-throated Flycatcher
Paul,
You raise a good point. There is one site which historically has been THE site
for reporting rare birds state wide, and that is the Cornell listserve N
r 21, 2016 12:25 PM
To: Andrew Baksh
Cc: Ethan Maitra; ebirds...@yahoogroups.com; nysbirds-l
Subject: Re: [ebirdsnyc] Re: [nysbirds-l] Brooklyn Ash-throated Flycatcher
As I think I'm being called out here perhaps let's talk about some
recommendations on how rarities are reported? A
..@yahoogroups.com"
; nysbirds-l
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 12:25 PM
Subject: Re: [ebirdsnyc] Re: [nysbirds-l] Brooklyn Ash-throated Flycatcher
As I think I'm being called out here perhaps let's talk
about some recommendations on how rarities are reported? Andrew you could
As I think I'm being called out here perhaps let's talk about some
recommendations on how rarities are reported? Andrew you could take the lead
here? One problem is that there are two “rare bird alerts” for NY that are
often filled with run-of-the-mill daily lists and non rarity sightings. Whil
Good point but for many, the Nassau County ATFL might be out of the way. More
interesting for me, is how the Brooklyn bird was reported. It appears to me
that we are once again seeing a break down on how rare to uncommon birds are
being reported.
I'll withhold fire for now but I again urge all
We did not get the bird after 90 mins of looking. Cops showed up after
that. While they were taking info and issuing summonses, i kept looking.
they were good natured.
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 11:00 AM nathan o'reilly natro...@hotmail.com
[ebirdsnyc] wrote:
>
>
> Did they get the bird before the