On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The revision identifiers returned by methods like
MicroKernel.getHeadRevision() are plain strings so in theory I could
write one down on a piece of paper, lock it in a safe, and come back
ten years later
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Stefan Guggisberg
stefan.guggisb...@gmail.com wrote:
i don't think that we should allow clients to explicitly extend the life span
of a specific revision. this would IMO unnecessarily complicate the GC
logic and it would allow misbehaved clients to
