Hi,
I got a ConcurrentModificationException while checking the 0.3 release.
This didn't cause any test case to fail but was printed to the console.
Michael
Running org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.JcrTckTest
java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jukka Zitting updated OAK-163:
--
Attachment: 0001-OAK-163-Move-the-JCR-TCK-back-to-the-integrationTest.patch
The attached patch implements
Hi Michi,
Yes, Tom experienced the same issue yesterday. I'm gonna have a look.
Thanks
Dominique
On Jul 4, 2012, at 11:23 AM, Michael Dürig wrote:
Hi,
I got a ConcurrentModificationException while checking the 0.3 release.
This didn't cause any test case to fail but was printed to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13406398#comment-13406398
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-163:
There's a risk that people *won't* run the TCK
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13406401#comment-13406401
]
Jukka Zitting commented on OAK-163:
---
bq. There's a risk that people won't run the TCK
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13406419#comment-13406419
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-163:
bq. That's what we have the CI build for.
Hi,
Last week some of us met for another small Oakathon in Basel. Below is a
list of topics that where touched and worked on and the related Jira
issues. Any additional input is appreciated.
- Observation (OAK-144):
* Observation events don't report every single event but rather a
Michael Dürig created OAK-164:
-
Summary: Replace Tree.remove(String) with Tree.remove()
Key: OAK-164
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-164
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13406535#comment-13406535
]
Jukka Zitting commented on OAK-165:
---
I understand where this is coming from (access
Jukka Zitting created OAK-167:
-
Summary: Caching NodeStore implementation
Key: OAK-167
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-167
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type: New Feature
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13406581#comment-13406581
]
Stefan Guggisberg commented on OAK-167:
---
Such a NodeStore implementation could also be
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
Last week some of us met for another small Oakathon in Basel. Below is a
list of topics that where touched and worked on and the related Jira issues.
Any additional input is appreciated.
- Observation (OAK-144):
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Stefan Guggisberg
stefan.guggisb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote:
- HTTP bindings (OAK-103, OAK-104)
* Provide extension points for Sling to hook into. (See also the
i don't remember any
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Dürig resolved OAK-161.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.4
Fixed at revision 1357314
Refactor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13406609#comment-13406609
]
Stefan Guggisberg commented on OAK-114:
---
Would it be possible to change for at least
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13406619#comment-13406619
]
Michael Dürig commented on OAK-114:
---
bq. i can't follow this argument. with my proposal a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13406622#comment-13406622
]
Michael Dürig commented on OAK-114:
---
BTW: why is 10 minutes the correct value?
2012/7/4 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com:
Hi,
It came up as a potential option that Sling might be interested in.
For example, many Sling components are currently having a hard time
with the JCR observation feature, and giving them access to lower
level features in Oak (or
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13406637#comment-13406637
]
Jukka Zitting edited comment on OAK-114 at 7/4/12 5:53 PM:
---
bq. i
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder oak-trunk while building
ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/oak-trunk/builds/80
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: osiris_ubuntu
Build Reason: forced: by IRC user
20 matches
Mail list logo