ConcurrentModificationException during gc run

2012-07-04 Thread Michael Dürig
Hi, I got a ConcurrentModificationException while checking the 0.3 release. This didn't cause any test case to fail but was printed to the console. Michael Running org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.JcrTckTest java.util.ConcurrentModificationException at

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-163) Move the JCR TCK back to the integrationTesting profile

2012-07-04 Thread Jukka Zitting (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jukka Zitting updated OAK-163: -- Attachment: 0001-OAK-163-Move-the-JCR-TCK-back-to-the-integrationTest.patch The attached patch implements

Re: ConcurrentModificationException during gc run

2012-07-04 Thread Dominique Pfister
Hi Michi, Yes, Tom experienced the same issue yesterday. I'm gonna have a look. Thanks Dominique On Jul 4, 2012, at 11:23 AM, Michael Dürig wrote: Hi, I got a ConcurrentModificationException while checking the 0.3 release. This didn't cause any test case to fail but was printed to the

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-163) Move the JCR TCK back to the integrationTesting profile

2012-07-04 Thread Julian Reschke (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13406398#comment-13406398 ] Julian Reschke commented on OAK-163: There's a risk that people *won't* run the TCK

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-163) Move the JCR TCK back to the integrationTesting profile

2012-07-04 Thread Jukka Zitting (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13406401#comment-13406401 ] Jukka Zitting commented on OAK-163: --- bq. There's a risk that people won't run the TCK

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-163) Move the JCR TCK back to the integrationTesting profile

2012-07-04 Thread Julian Reschke (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13406419#comment-13406419 ] Julian Reschke commented on OAK-163: bq. That's what we have the CI build for.

Notes from the Oakathon

2012-07-04 Thread Michael Dürig
Hi, Last week some of us met for another small Oakathon in Basel. Below is a list of topics that where touched and worked on and the related Jira issues. Any additional input is appreciated. - Observation (OAK-144): * Observation events don't report every single event but rather a

[jira] [Created] (OAK-164) Replace Tree.remove(String) with Tree.remove()

2012-07-04 Thread JIRA
Michael Dürig created OAK-164: - Summary: Replace Tree.remove(String) with Tree.remove() Key: OAK-164 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-164 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type:

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-165) NodeDelegate should not use Tree.getChild() but rather Root.getTree()

2012-07-04 Thread Jukka Zitting (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13406535#comment-13406535 ] Jukka Zitting commented on OAK-165: --- I understand where this is coming from (access

[jira] [Created] (OAK-167) Caching NodeStore implementation

2012-07-04 Thread Jukka Zitting (JIRA)
Jukka Zitting created OAK-167: - Summary: Caching NodeStore implementation Key: OAK-167 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-167 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type: New Feature

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-167) Caching NodeStore implementation

2012-07-04 Thread Stefan Guggisberg (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13406581#comment-13406581 ] Stefan Guggisberg commented on OAK-167: --- Such a NodeStore implementation could also be

Re: Notes from the Oakathon

2012-07-04 Thread Stefan Guggisberg
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote: Hi, Last week some of us met for another small Oakathon in Basel. Below is a list of topics that where touched and worked on and the related Jira issues. Any additional input is appreciated. - Observation (OAK-144):

Re: Notes from the Oakathon

2012-07-04 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Stefan Guggisberg stefan.guggisb...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote: - HTTP bindings (OAK-103, OAK-104) * Provide extension points for Sling to hook into. (See also the i don't remember any

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-161) Refactor Tree#getChildStatus

2012-07-04 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Dürig resolved OAK-161. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.4 Fixed at revision 1357314 Refactor

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-114) MicroKernel API: specify retention policy for old revisions

2012-07-04 Thread Stefan Guggisberg (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13406609#comment-13406609 ] Stefan Guggisberg commented on OAK-114: --- Would it be possible to change for at least

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-114) MicroKernel API: specify retention policy for old revisions

2012-07-04 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13406619#comment-13406619 ] Michael Dürig commented on OAK-114: --- bq. i can't follow this argument. with my proposal a

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-114) MicroKernel API: specify retention policy for old revisions

2012-07-04 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13406622#comment-13406622 ] Michael Dürig commented on OAK-114: --- BTW: why is 10 minutes the correct value?

Re: Notes from the Oakathon

2012-07-04 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
2012/7/4 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com: Hi, It came up as a potential option that Sling might be interested in. For example, many Sling components are currently having a hard time with the JCR observation feature, and giving them access to lower level features in Oak (or

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-114) MicroKernel API: specify retention policy for old revisions

2012-07-04 Thread Jukka Zitting (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13406637#comment-13406637 ] Jukka Zitting edited comment on OAK-114 at 7/4/12 5:53 PM: --- bq. i

buildbot success in ASF Buildbot on oak-trunk

2012-07-04 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder oak-trunk while building ASF Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://ci.apache.org/builders/oak-trunk/builds/80 Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: osiris_ubuntu Build Reason: forced: by IRC user