hi ian
One last question.
Should I expect a a SecurityConfiguration to be present ?
no, you have to specify the security provider you want to
use. this is still work in progress but right now SecurityProvider
was the entry point to use. there is also a known TODO in the
Oak class because the
hi
while taking a closer look at the base state associated with a TreeImpl
i got the impression at the same base NodeState is also available from
the NodeBuilder associated with the tree.
if this was really the case: what is the reason for keeping it twice?
regards
angela
On 3.4.13 9:15, Angela Schreiber wrote:
hi
while taking a closer look at the base state associated with a TreeImpl
i got the impression at the same base NodeState is also available from
the NodeBuilder associated with the tree.
if this was really the case: what is the reason for keeping it
Build Update for apache/jackrabbit-oak
-
Build: #1095
Status: Fixed
Duration: 28 minutes and 19 seconds
Commit: b122090 (trunk)
Author: Angela Schreiber
Message: minor improvement
git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/trunk@1463961
On 3.4.13 11:26, Michael Dürig wrote:
On 3.4.13 9:15, Angela Schreiber wrote:
hi
while taking a closer look at the base state associated with a TreeImpl
i got the impression at the same base NodeState is also available from
the NodeBuilder associated with the tree.
if this was really the
