I see two similar classes
-
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.rdb.SynchronizedDocumentStoreWrapper
-
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.util.SynchronizingDocumentStoreWrapper
And these are not being used anywhere. Further I am not sure what
purpose it would serve. Should they
Build Update for apache/jackrabbit-oak
-
Build: #3895
Status: Fixed
Duration: 2674 seconds
Commit: e2fdea48970ac1456d986a3486d3e9980e4d9f06 (trunk)
Author: Marcel Reutegger
Message: OAK-1626: RDBBlobStoreTest fails occasionally
Disabled the test for now
On 2014-03-27 09:54, Chetan Mehrotra wrote:
I see two similar classes
-
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.rdb.SynchronizedDocumentStoreWrapper
-
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.util.SynchronizingDocumentStoreWrapper
And these are not being used anywhere. Further I am not
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de wrote:
I created the first one, and use it occasionally for debugging. (it's
similar to the Logging*Wrapper. Please do not remove.
Okie but there already one preset in Util. Are they different? If not
we should keep only one
OK, now I got the OOME as well with my local in-memory H2 changes.
it failed in ObservationRefreshTest. I analyzed the heap dump and
it looks like the memory usage of this particular test is quite high
because it uses orderable child nodes and adds child nodes one
by one.
I think that can be
Hi,
I think proxies are a bit problematic. I would prefer the non-proxy
version.
Regards,
Thomas
On 27/03/14 10:41, Chetan Mehrotra chetan.mehro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de
wrote:
I created the first one, and use it occasionally
On 2014-03-27 10:41, Chetan Mehrotra wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de wrote:
I created the first one, and use it occasionally for debugging. (it's
similar to the Logging*Wrapper. Please do not remove.
Okie but there already one preset in Util. Are
On 2014-03-27 10:53, Marcel Reutegger wrote:
OK, now I got the OOME as well with my local in-memory H2 changes.
it failed in ObservationRefreshTest. I analyzed the heap dump and
it looks like the memory usage of this particular test is quite high
because it uses orderable child nodes and adds
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de wrote:
We can kill the one in rdb (I didn't see the other one when I added it).
Would do
Chetan Mehrotra
Build Update for apache/jackrabbit-oak
-
Build: #3897
Status: Fixed
Duration: 2826 seconds
Commit: 62a9e0ace988f42e73a0b2021505469fece2efe6 (trunk)
Author: Marcel Reutegger
Message: OAK-1627: Use non-orderable child nodes in ObservationRefreshTest
git-svn-id:
Build Update for apache/jackrabbit-oak
-
Build: #3900
Status: Errored
Duration: 1079 seconds
Commit: f43a1720c1fbe3ef91c925e821cc897a746bcb84 (trunk)
Author: Julian Reschke
Message: OAK-1544 - handle too wide keys more gracefully (see also OAK-1629)
Hi there,
I'd like to run the tests against a blob store that might not be empty,
and thus rewrite the tests so that they do not assume to run on an empty
store, and just to cleanup what they created.
Please let me know ASAP if there's a reason not to...
Best regards, Julian
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de wrote:
if there's a reason not to
It might effect test related to GC as GC logic would clean more than
expected set of blobs
Chetan Mehrotra
Hi,
Currently Commit.getModified has following impl
-
public static long getModified(long timestamp) {
// 5 second resolution
return timestamp / 1000 / 5;
}
-
The result when treated as timestamp cause the time to set to 0 i.e. 1970
I intend to fix this with (looking
Build Update for apache/jackrabbit-oak
-
Build: #3906
Status: Fixed
Duration: 2681 seconds
Commit: 07e1737953eb1c84680efb923adbaf998196bd9f (trunk)
Author: Julian Reschke
Message: fix svn:eol-style
git-svn-id:
Build Update for apache/jackrabbit-oak
-
Build: #3907
Status: Fixed
Duration: 2912 seconds
Commit: d4c79f39b6dbcb46b5f8cc41a2b664ab633edbeb (trunk)
Author: Chetan Mehrotra
Message: OAK-1341 - DocumentNodeStore: Implement revision garbage collection
(WIP)
Build Update for apache/jackrabbit-oak
-
Build: #3914
Status: Passed
Duration: 2799 seconds
Commit: 6d8146f847e04e5172defb11c1d3d3bdf008c774 (trunk)
Author: Jukka Zitting
Message: OAK-1624: Item names with trailing spaces should not be allowed
Prevent names
17 matches
Mail list logo