On 18.8.14 8:41 , KÖLL Claus wrote:
The longer we wait now the harder it will be to create clean and easier to
understand documentation
I agree we should do the move, however doubt that right now is a good
point in time. This will affect the ongoing work in theses areas, which
is all
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote:
This will affect the ongoing work in theses areas, which is all merged back
into the 1.0 branch. We should also consider Marcel and Alex, who will
probably be most affected by the additional merge effort.
I also think
Hi,
We were struggling past couple of weeks with severe performance issues
on AEM6/Oak/MongoNS -- fortunately the issue was due to VM we were
using. So, all seems well for now.
BUT, during investigation, one of the things that we were worried
about was document cache missing hits... we tried
Hello Vikas,
On 18/08/2014 12:05, Vikas Saurabh wrote:
Hi,
...
specify a cache size. While I agree that cache should be a memory
hog... but entry size of a document in cache is quite variable in
nature and as an admin I can make guesses about JCR nodes and their
access patters. Document
we can probably have both and cache respects whichever constraint hits
first (sort of min(byte size, entry size)).
First of all I don't know MongoNS implementation details so I can be wrong.
I'd rather keep the size in bytes as it gives me much more control over
the memory I have and what I
