Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.3

On 2017-07-03 15:52, Davide Giannella wrote: ... [X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.3 Best regards, Julian

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.3

+1 Tommaso Il giorno lun 3 lug 2017 alle ore 17:20 Alex Deparvu ha scritto: > +1 > > On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Davide Giannella > wrote: > > A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.3 release is available at: > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.3

+1 On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Davide Giannella wrote: > A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.3 release is available at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.7.3/ > > The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: > > >

Re: Blobstore consistency check

Hi Andrei, Ok, here is the context, apologize for not starting with that first. I’m working on a PTR (point in time restore) proof of concept involving large asset repositories. The easy way for small-ish repos would be to backup everyday everything and when the customer pops by and says “I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.3

[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.3 Davide

Re: [DiSCUSS] - highly vs rarely used data

I am sure there are both use cases for automatic vs manual/controlled collection of unused data, however if I were a user I would personally not want to care about this. While I'd be happy to know that my repo is faster / smaller / cleaner / whatever it'd sound overly complex to deal with JCR and

[VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.3

A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.3 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.7.3/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.7.3/ The SHA1 checksum of the

Re: Blobstore consistency check

Hi Andrei, AFAIK, there isn't currently such an option for the consistency check. What scenario do you have in mind for using it? Regards, Andrei 2017-07-03 16:32 GMT+03:00 Andrei Kalfas : > Hi, > > I’m reading about the consistency check tool thats available via

Re: [DiSCUSS] - highly vs rarely used data

Hi, > a property on the node, e.g. "archiveState=toArchive" I wonder if we _can_ easily write to the version store? Also, some nodetypes don't allow such properties? It might need to be a hidden property, but then you can't use the JCR API. Or maintain this data in a "shadow" structure (not

Re: Intent to backport OAK-6410

+1 On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Marcel Reutegger wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to backport OAK-6410 to the maintenance branches. It fixes a NPE > when an attempt is made to remove an inexistent property from a checked in > node. I consider this a low risk fix. > >

Re: Intent to backport OAK-6410

On 2017-07-03 11:51, Marcel Reutegger wrote: Hi, I'd like to backport OAK-6410 to the maintenance branches. It fixes a NPE when an attempt is made to remove an inexistent property from a checked in node. I consider this a low risk fix. Regards Marcel +1

Intent to backport OAK-6410

Hi, I'd like to backport OAK-6410 to the maintenance branches. It fixes a NPE when an attempt is made to remove an inexistent property from a checked in node. I consider this a low risk fix. Regards Marcel

BUILD FAILURE: Jackrabbit Oak - Build # 488 - Failure

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Jackrabbit Oak (build #488) Status: Failure Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/488/ to view the results. Changes: [chetanm] Update docs related to indexPath support [chetanm] OAK-6271 - Support for importing index