On 11.03.20, 09:25, "Nitin Gupta" wrote:
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.2.
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast.
All checks OK.
+1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.2
all checks ok
kind regards
angela
From: Nitin Gupta
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2020 9:25 AM
To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.2
A candidate for the
Hi,
On 12.03.20, 00:04, "Matt Ryan" wrote:
> Further digging revealed what I suspected - that the ObservationManager
> approach actually uses an Observer registered with the whiteboard under
> the covers.
>
> The question remains though - why the two approaches, and in specific
> why are
Hi Sandeep,
In both scenarios you describe how a DocumentNodeStore instance
is created. Your application must have more components than just
a NodeStore implementation to get search working in Oak using
Lucene. The NodeStore implementation itself does not provide
any search functionality. Please
Any updates on this?
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020, 12:24 PM Sandeep Ambule wrote:
> >So, this is not about RDB, but about using the DocumentNodeStoreService
> or not, right?
>
> Yes, This is not about RDB ,Its about using osgi service, here i am using
> DocumentNodeStoreService.
>
> In scenario 2: i
