Re: Composite blob store and Overlay blob store proposals

2017-07-27 Thread Arek Kita
2017-07-26 17:38 GMT+02:00 Matt Ryan : > Hi Arek, > > >> Regarding CompositeBlobStore -- what if customer changes the storage >> rules in the meantime (refers also to Curation section). This will >> result in the new layout for writes but binaries won't be read >> correctly, am I

Fwd: Composite blob store and Overlay blob store proposals

2017-07-27 Thread Arek Kita
Hi, 2017-07-26 17:33 GMT+02:00 Matt Ryan : > >> If you could configure priority for read in the following order: {FBS, >> S3DS} but for writes in inverse order {S3DS, FBS} then this will >> almost satisfy any DataStore migration scenarios (except the need to >> transfer content

Re: Composite blob store and Overlay blob store proposals

2017-07-26 Thread Arek Kita
2017-07-26 11:02 GMT+02:00 Arek Kita <kitarek+...@gmail.com>: > S3DataStore ---> AmazonDataStore oops, should be: S3DataStore ---> AzureDataStore

Re: Composite blob store and Overlay blob store proposals

2017-07-26 Thread Arek Kita
Hi Matt, In the wiki there is no precise IMHO statement about write: > The overlay blob store fulfills write requests by attempting to write to each > delegate in priority order. Once a write is successfully satisfied by a > delegate, the result of the delegate write is returned as the result

Re: [ops] Unify NodeStore/DataStore configurations by using nstab

2017-06-07 Thread Arek Kita
Hi Matt, 2017-06-01 1:03 GMT+02:00 Matt Ryan : > I'm curious as to the status of this. Is it being worked on? > Please excuse me a bit late response to that topic. Unfortunately I'm not working *actively* on this anymore at least for now but I'm happy to help and contribute.

[ops] Unify NodeStore/DataStore configurations by using nstab

2017-04-28 Thread Arek Kita
Hi, I've noticed recently that with many different NodeStore implementation (Segment, Document, Multiplexing) but also DataStore implementation (File, S3, Azure) and some composite ones like (Hierarchical, Federated - that was already mentioned in [0]) it becomes more and more difficult to set up

Mongo timeouts

2017-03-17 Thread Arek Kita
Hi, I have a problem with Mongo [0]. It causes timeouts. This might be due to MongoDB is not present at all (inaccessible) or there are rather a connectivity issues. How I can check and fine tune mongo connection parameters? I've reviewed Oak documentation [1] and codebase [2,3] but I haven't

Re: New module oak-blob-cloud-azure?

2017-03-15 Thread Arek Kita
Hi Amit, On 15/03/2017, 10:29, "amit@gmail.com on behalf of Amit Jain" wrote: > Hi Team, > > There is a new contribution for azure blob storage support - OAK-4933. > This introduces a new module oak-blob-cloud-azure. This certainly seems to >

Re: oak-run, diet and new module

2017-02-10 Thread Arek Kita
Hi, On 10/02/17 10:09, "Francesco Mari" wrote: > As much as I like the proposal of slimming down oak-run, I think that > dividing oak-run in oak-operations and oak-development is the wrong > way to go. This kind of division is horizontal, since commands > pertaining to