On 14/07/2015 10:25, Chetan Mehrotra wrote:
> ...
>
> 1. commons-lang DurationFormatterUtils [1] - Adding dependency to
> whole of commons-lang might not make sense. So we can probably copy
> it. It though depends on others common lang classes so copying would
> be tricky
I'm for not reinventing t
Hello team,
next monday AM (BST) I will cut the next unstable release: 1.3.3.
Please have a look by then of the open issues and re-schedule accordingly.
If you'll need more time 'cause you want an issue to be in 1.3.3 rather
than wait another couple of weeks, say it as usual.
Davide
On 14/07/2015 08:36, Michael Dürig wrote:
>
> ...
> What do people think about leveraging this mechanism for
> http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/? Currently we only host
> Javadocs for the latest release. Should we start linking to
> http://www.javadoc.io/ for older releases? Should we stop hos
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.17
Davide
The Apache Jackrabbit community is pleased to announce the release of
Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.3.2. The release is available for download at:
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html
See the full release notes below for details about this release.
Release Notes -- Apache Jackrabbit Oak -- Ve
Hello Team,
the vote passes as follows:
+1 Alex Parvulescu
+1 Davide Giannella
+1 Marcel Reutegger
+1 Michael Dürig
Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out.
-- Davide
On 03/07/2015 12:21, Chetan Mehrotra wrote:
> ...I propose we use following labels
>
> candidate_oak_1_0
> candidate_oak_1_2
>
sounds good to me.
Davide
We currently have 100+ issues scheduled for the next development
iteration which we aim at a 2 weeks cycle.
It's kind-of impossible we manage to close all of them and every time
there are bulk moves.
My suggestion would be to schedule them for 1.4 and either set 1.3.x
when fixed, or a smaller set
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.3.2
Davide
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.3.2 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.3.2/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.3.2/
The SHA1 checksum of the ar
I just realised that oak-exercises is deployed on maven on release.
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak-exercise/
I think it's better, for disk saving and deploying time to skip this
artifact from the deploy phase.
Anyone against it?
Davide
On 29/06/2015 10:22, Francesco Mari wrote:
> ...
>
> Is it possible - or does it make sense - to make this behaviour
> uniform across components?
>
I think it's a good idea to uniform this aspect. Maybe we could put it
down as a guideline by setting up a new page on the doc site:
code-conventions.m
On 27/06/2015 04:56, Apache Jenkins Server wrote:
> The Apache Jenkins build system has built Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix (build
> #228)
>
> Status: Still Failing
>
> Check console output at
> https://builds.apache.org/job/Apache%20Jackrabbit%20Oak%20matrix/228/ to view
> the results.
[ERROR]
On 25/06/2015 16:25, Vikas Saurabh wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Alex Parvulescu
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I recently noticed that we've included at least one issue closed as 'Won't
>> Fix' in the release notes [0], [1].
>> In the past we used to remove the fix version on issues closed as
The Apache Jackrabbit community is pleased to announce the release of
Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.3.1. The release is available for download at:
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html
See the full release notes below for details about this release.
Release Notes -- Apache Jackrabbit Oak -- Ve
Hello Team,
the vote passes as follows:
+1 Amit Jain
+1 Davide Giannella
+1 Julian Reschke
+1 Marcel Reutegger
Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out.
-- Davide
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.16
Davide
hello there,
today I was running some tests locally and the baseline plugin is
failing for oak-core
[ERROR] org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.spi.security.user.action: Version
increase required; detected 1.0.2, suggested 1.0.3
I tried to see if we had it on jenkins, and can't find it there. It
could be
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.3.1 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.3.1/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.3.1/
The SHA1 checksum of the ar
On 18/06/2015 12:32, Julian Reschke wrote:
>
> I have unscheduled or rescheduled everything that I was assigned to,
> except:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2987
>
> This is fixed in 1.3.1 but not yet closed as I still need to backport
> it. Should I resolve it?
thank Julian, if you
Good morning Team,
next monday around 10AM I will be cutting 1.3.1 as by plan.
We still have 137 unresolved issues. Please take a look at them and act
accordingly. In case I will bulk move them to 1.3.2 if not resolved.
In case you need more time because you'd like to have an issue fixed by
this
Good afternoon team,
was looking into the exports (package-info) we currently have in trunk
and we have a mix of 2.0 and 2.0.0. IMO is wrong. Shall we pick one and
fix accordingly? WDYT? If so I'm happy to do so.
Following a list.
$ find . -type f -iname "package-info.java" -exec grep -H
"@Versi
Hello Team,
right now we have 3 versions of API: 1.0, 1.2 and 1.4 (trunk). Currently
we provide online only the trunk version: 1.3.0 as it's being pushed
while writing.
It would be nice if we could provide all the three versions for
consultation: apidocs/1.0.x, apidocs/1.2.x, apidocs/1.3.x.
Anyo
The Apache Jackrabbit community is pleased to announce the release of
Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.3.0. The release is available for download at:
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html
See the full release notes below for details about this release.
Jackrabbit Oak is a scalable, high-performan
Hello Team,
the vote passes as follows:
+1 Amit Jain
+1 Davide Giannella
+1 Julian Reschke
+1 Marcel Reutegger
+1 Micheal Dürig
Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out.
-- Davide
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.15
Davide
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.3.0 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.3.0/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.3.0/
The SHA1 checksum of the ar
The Apache Jackrabbit community is pleased to announce the release of
Apache Jackrabbit Oak ${version}. The release is available for download at:
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html
See the full release notes below for details about this release.
Release Notes -- Apache Jackrabbit -- V
On 04/06/2015 11:16, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2015-06-04 12:08, Davide Giannella wrote:
>> Hello team,
>>
>> anyone against updating our 1.0 and 1.2 branches to use Jacrabbit
>> 2.10.1?
>>
>> Cheers
>> Davide
>
> No, please go ahead!
As I w
Hello team,
anyone against updating our 1.0 and 1.2 branches to use Jacrabbit 2.10.1?
Cheers
Davide
Hello team,
Monday AM (BST) I will be cutting oak 1.3.0.
As of now we have 128 unresolved issues for such. Please take your time
to resolve or re-schedule them. In case I will bulk move them to 1.3.1
before the cut.
Cheers
Davide
On 20/05/2015 14:14, Chetan Mehrotra wrote:
> ...
> 1. Document explicitly if any new config option is introduced
> 2. If any new feature is introduced then a brief description of that
>
> This should be done before the actual release is performed.
>
> Do share your thoughts on how the release note
The Apache Jackrabbit community is pleased to announce the release of
Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.14. The release is available for download at:
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html
See the full release notes below for details about this release.
Release Notes -- Apache Jackrabbit Oak -- V
Hello team,
what's the policy with closing an issue if this is part of a just
released release and has a fixVersion of a not yet released version?
Shall I leave it open or close?
Davide
Hello Team,
the vote passes as follows:
+1 Alex Parvulescu
+1 Amit Jain
+1 Davide Giannella
+1 Julian Reschke
+1 Marcel Reutegger
+1 Michael Dürig
+1 Tommaso Teofili
Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out.
-- Davide
On 12/05/2015 14:40, Travis CI wrote:
> Build Update for apache/jackrabbit-oak
> -
>
> Build: #5570
> Status: Errored
>
>
"Your test run exceeded 50 minutes. "
Davide
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.14 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.0.14/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.0.14/
The SHA1 checksum of the
On 12/05/2015 08:08, Michael Dürig wrote:
>
> ...
> Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
> ...
thanks for spotting. fixed in r1678922
-- Davide
On 13/04/2015 10:12, chet...@apache.org wrote:
> ...
> +private static class ExecutorCloser implements Closeable {
> +final ExecutorService executorService;
> +
> +private ExecutorCloser(ExecutorService executorService) {
> +this.executorService = executorService;
>
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.2.2
Davide
Hello Team,
the vote passes as follows:
+1 Alex Parvulescu
+1 Amit Jain
+1 Davide Giannella
+1 Julian Reschke
+1 Marcel Reutegger
Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out.
-- Davide
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.13 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.0.13/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.0.13/
The SHA1 checksum of the
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.2.1
-- Davide
Good morning team,
tomorrow, Friday 17th I'm aiming to cut Oak 1.0.13 at 10am BST.
There are still 2 open issues. Please remember to update jira by that
time and in case you can't make it or need more time ping me directly.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20OAK%20AND%20f
On 14/04/2015 09:18, Marcel Reutegger wrote:
> On 14/04/15 10:03, "Davide Giannella" wrote:
>> shall we enable a Jenkins matrix for the 1.2 branch? I think it will be
>> a good added value.
> +1
>
> the sooner the better...
>
Filed https://issues.apache.org/
Hello team,
shall we enable a Jenkins matrix for the 1.2 branch? I think it will be
a good added value.
thoughts?
-- Davide
On 09/04/2015 14:56, Marcel Reutegger wrote:
> ...
> I'd still like to keep our unstable releases we did in the
> past and use 1.3.x for this purpose, but using 1.4-SNAPSHOT
> between those releases makes it clear the current snapshot
> from trunk is always newer than any previous unstable release.
Hello team,
it's been a while (two releases AFAIR) that when I push a release I
receive this message.
I'm fine in fulfilling the form but as far as I can see we don't have an
"Oak" entry for it. I tried `jackrabbit-oak` as well as `oak`.
We could reuse the `jackrabbit` one, and having releases i
The Apache Jackrabbit community is pleased to announce the release of
Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.1.8. The release is available for download at:
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html
See the full release notes below for details about this release.
Release Notes -- Apache Jackrabbit Oak -- Ve
Hello Team,
the vote passes as follows:
+1 Amit Jain
+1 Davide Giannella
+1 Marcel Reutegger
+1 Michael Dürig
Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out.
-- Davide
PS: I've postponed this step after Easter as we had infrastructure
problems some days ago.
On 01/04/2015 07:29, Marcel Reutegger wrote:
> The test failure was:
>
> Failed tests:
> testProxyFlippedIntermediateByteChange(org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.se
> gment.standby.ExternalSharedStoreIT): expected:<{ root = { ... } }> but
> was:<{ root : { } }>
>
>
> It's a bit difficult for me
On 31/03/2015 11:48, Chetan Mehrotra wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> CopyOnRead feature was provided as part of 1.0.9 release and has been in
> used in quite a few customer deployment. Of late we have to recommend to
> enable this setting on most of the deployments where queries are found to
> be performing
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.1.8 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.1.8/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.1.8/
The SHA1 checksum of the ar
On 30/03/2015 11:28, Chetan Mehrotra wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Marcel Reutegger
> wrote:
>
>> one more thing to consider: travis also builds branches, while
>> the current apache jenkins job we have does not.
>>
> The branch aspect is important. So we should only remove travis once
Hello Team,
as we now have apache jenkins notifications, apache buildbot
notifications and travis notifications, I'd like to move the .travis.yml
into the attic. This I guess, should disable the travis build.
It's been inconsistent anyhow for long.
Cheers
Davide
On 26/03/2015 14:20, Angela Schreiber wrote:
> ...
> I would therefore like to suggest to retire the oak-mk-remote module
> (e.g. moving it to attic) and removing it of the main oak pom.xml. The
> corresponding JIRA component description should only be adjusted to
> reflect this but will continue t
On 20/03/2015 07:36, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2015-03-20 01:48, Alexander Klimetschek wrote:
>> AFAIK, this is expected, on Windows (or some Windows versions),
>> System.currentTimeMillis() only has a resolution of 15ms
>>
>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7859019/system-currenttimemillis-is-
Hello Team,
during this first year with Oak 1.0.x we took the habit to use the
`disabled` has index type when we wanted to disable (temporary or not)
an index.
It works, but it could lead to errors that are difficult to investigate
later on if/when re-enabled. For example the index will be out of
had an offline discussion with Michael and we're still deciding about
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2596 if it's a blocker or not.
Postponing the cut for now.
-- Davide
On 16/03/2015 09:11, Davide Giannella wrote:
> Hello team,
>
> friendly reminder about today a
Hello team,
friendly reminder about today and the cut. It will be 12pm GMT. So
please mark any issue as blocker if you have to have your issue in the
release.
Cheers
Davide
On 12/03/2015 09:56, Davide Giannella wrote:
> Hello team,
>
> next Monday should be cut day. We have 21 iss
Hello team,
next Monday should be cut day. We have 21 issues still unresolved for
1.1.8. None of them blocker.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project+%3D+OAK+AND+fixVersion+%3D+1.1.8+AND+resolution+%3D+Unresolved+ORDER+BY+due+ASC%2C+priority+DESC%2C+created+ASC
If no one will state o
The Apache Jackrabbit community is pleased to announce the release of
Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.1.7. The release is available for download at:
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html
See the full release notes below for details about this release.
Release Notes -- Apache Jackrabbit Oak -- Ve
Hello Team,
the vote passes as follows:
+1 Davide Giannella
+1 Michael Duerig
+1 Julian Reschke
Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out.
-- Davide
On 04/03/2015 12:03, Davide Giannella wrote:
> A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.1.7 release is available at:
>
hello team,
as part of OAK-2472 I'm introducing the concept of asynchronous commit
hook. Read it as asynchronous processing of EditorProvider.
The code is still in early stages and will require clean-up and proper
refactoring later on.
To achieve the concept of asynchronous EditorProvider I adde
On 05/03/2015 09:15, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Because of OAK-2576, I think Oak 1.1.7 it not usable. So I would stop work
> on it.
>
Thanks Thomas, wanted to make it a blocker for 1.1.8 but I see it's been
already resolved.
Is the above a -1? The vote is still open, so if anyone want to
reco
On 05/03/2015 06:01, Chetan Mehrotra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Looking at Travis build history it appears that builds are not getting
> fired for last few commits [1]. Any idea why it might happen like
> this?
>
> However look at Apache buildbot it appears last one [2] was successful
> but did not received
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.1.7 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.1.7/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.1.7/
The SHA1 checksum of the ar
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.12
Davide
Good morning team,
tomorrow 10am GMT I'm planning to cut 1.1.7. Still 20 issues in
unresolved state.
If I won't receive any feedbacks by then I will move them to 1.1.8 and
start the cut.
Cheers
Davide
On 18/02/2015 09:36, Davide Giannella wrote:
> On 16/02/2015 09:04, Davide Gi
On 25/02/2015 01:39, Marcel Reutegger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't see a reason why we should keep them.
>
> +1 for cleaning up.
>
+1
D.
On 16/02/2015 09:04, Davide Giannella wrote:
> On 16/02/2015 08:35, Chetan Mehrotra wrote:
>> Hi Davide,
>>
>> Can we postphone the release for couple of day. I am in between fixing
>> OAK-2517 and would like to have this included in next release
> Sure no problem.
On 16/02/2015 08:50, Chetan Mehrotra wrote:
> ...
> Would it be fine if we also ship with a default config similar to JR2?
> This should reduce the fulltext index size and make the default
> support equivalent to one in JR2
>
+1
On 16/02/2015 08:35, Chetan Mehrotra wrote:
> Hi Davide,
>
> Can we postphone the release for couple of day. I am in between fixing
> OAK-2517 and would like to have this included in next release
Sure no problem. Let's pencil it for Wednesday.
Cheers
Davide
Good morning team,
In the constant effort of a bi-weekly unstable release, the next cut is
going to be next Monday (AM).
As of now we have a 29 issue unresolved
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20OAK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.1.7%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%2
On 11/02/2015 12:19, Robert Munteanu wrote:
> We could probably raise an enhancement request which allows
> restricting the versions considered, such as 'no qualifiers', or a
> regexp-based validation or ... Robert
We could enhance the `comparisonVersion` to actually be a regex. Which
in our speci
The Apache Jackrabbit community is pleased to announce the release of
Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.1.6. The release is available for download at:
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html
See the full release notes below for details about this release.
Release Notes -- Apache Jackrabbit Oak -- Ve
Hello,
the vote passes as follows:
+1 Alex Parvulescu
+1 Amit Jain
+1 Davide Giannella
+1 Julian Reschke
+1 Marcel Reutegger
Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out.
Regards
Davide
On 04/02/2015 15:26, Davide Giannella wrote:
> A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.1.6 re
On 05/02/2015 16:43, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would use the "index" approach, at least for now. By the way, I have
> used the same idea for the approximate node counter mechanism (OAK-1907).
Yes that's the direction we're taking for now (see previous email from
myself). And the approximate
Hello team,
cross posting as it actually affects both jackrabbit as well as oak.
They both share the check-release.sh.
My suggestion is to add the integrationTesting profile on the check
release process to ensure a higher checks before actually providing a +1.
below a suggested (not tested yet)
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.1.6 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.1.6/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.1.6/
The SHA1 checksum of the archi
On 03/02/2015 15:41, Michael Dürig wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I think we should keep this independent from indexing. Running the
> counter consolidation asynchronously might have commonalities with
> async indexing. If so, I'd first implement the former separately and
> then factor out the commonalties.
Di
On 03/02/2015 15:53, Alex Parvulescu wrote:
> [0]
> Running org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.osgi.OSGiIT
> [main] INFO org.ops4j.pax.exam.spi.DefaultExamSystem - Pax Exam System
> (Version: 3.4.0) created.
> [main] INFO org.ops4j.pax.exam.junit.impl.ProbeRunner - creating PaxExam
> runner for class org.ap
On 30/01/2015 12:54, Davide Giannella wrote:
>
> No worries. Let's re-check on Wednesday.
>
Good morning everyone,
today at 12PM GMT I'd like to cut the new unstable version.
We still have 20 non-resolved issues for 1.1.6. May I ask everyone to
act on those either by moving
Good morning Team,
with OAK-2220 we added support for atomic counters on non-clustered
deployments.
Now with OAK-2472 we're trying to provide a reliable way for having it
working on a mongo cluster as well; read it some sort of async process.
We already instructed the Editor to write hidden vari
On 30/01/2015 10:13, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
> Hi Davide, all,
>
> OAK-2175 and OAK-2176 have high priority for me, I think I can close one of
> them until monday, but would probably require 1-2 days more to close the
> other, so I wonder: is it possible to move the release to Wednesday? (in
> case
Hello team,
Monday should be cut day.
For 1.1.6 we still have 23 issues in unresolved.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20OAK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.1.6%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20assignee%20ASC%2C%20due%20ASC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20crea
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.11
D.
On 23/01/2015 16:54, resc...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: reschke
> Date: Fri Jan 23 16:54:35 2015
> New Revision: 1654266
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1654266
> Log:
> fix svn:eol-style
>
I always found annoying the svn/eol thingy so starting from a chat with
Julian I started a bit of research.
The Apache Jackrabbit community is pleased to announce the release of
Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.1.5. The release is available for download at:
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html
See the full release notes below for details about this release.
Release Notes -- Apache Jackrabbit Oak -- Ve
Vote passes as follows:
+1 Alex Parvulescu
+1 Davide Giannella
+1 Julian Reschke
+1 Michael Dürig
I'll push the release out.
Davide
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.10
D.
Hello Team,
it seems our build is getting slower and slower, which is normal with
the increasing of tests, but maybe we would like to revise some of those.
I've filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2440
Please follow up on there with any thoughts.
Cheers
Davide
Good morning team,
travis is failing and it seems for good reasons this time
https://travis-ci.org/apache/jackrabbit-oak/builds/47694584
# Pedantic
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project oak-lucene: Could not resolve
> dependencies for project
org.apache.jackrabbit:oak-lucene:bundle:1.1-S
On 19/01/2015 16:43, Chetan Mehrotra wrote:
> Hi Davide,
>
> Can we also publish oak-run with this release?
> Chetan Mehrotra
>
I already cut and deployed it. Checked and oak-run is part of maven repo
but not of the deployed artifacts on the staging apache repo.
D.
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.1.5 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.1.5/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.1.5/
The SHA1 checksum of the ar
On 19/01/2015 14:44, dav...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: davide
> Date: Mon Jan 19 14:44:13 2015
> New Revision: 1653015
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1653015
> Log:
> OAK-2419: Release Oak 1.1.5
>
> - relase notes
>
>
> Modified:
> jackrabbit/oak/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>
> Modified: jackrabb
Will start cutting now.
Cheers
Davide
On 19/01/2015 08:25, Michael Dürig wrote:
>
> Failed tests:
> testGetSize(org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.QueryResultTest): Wrong
> size of NodeIterator in result expected:<48> but was:<-1>
>
> [1] http://ci.apache.org/builders/oak-trunk-win7/builds/1058
never happened to me. But run on osx, not w
Hello team,
in the constant aim of cutting an unstable release every two weeks, this
should be next Monday.
There are still a bunch of issues unresolved.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK/fixforversion/12329248
I've create already the 1.1.6 for everyone to move the fix version
according
Hello Chetan,
On 15/01/2015 15:16, chet...@apache.org wrote:
> class IndexDefinition implements Aggregate.AggregateMapper{
> +/**
> + * Name of the internal property that contains the child order defined in
> + * org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.tree.impl.TreeConstants
> + */
>
901 - 1000 of 1222 matches
Mail list logo
