, Dominique Pfister dpfis...@adobe.com wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to setup two distinct Oak repositories in the same VM, each
containing an OSGI whiteboard.
Looking at the components inside oak-core that announce their
availability using this whiteboard and the way the registration
Hi,
I'd like to setup two distinct Oak repositories in the same VM, each containing
an OSGI whiteboard.
Looking at the components inside oak-core that announce their availability
using this whiteboard and the way the registration is implemented in the OSGI
whiteboard, I was wondering
Hi Jukka,
On Jan 9, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Dominique Pfister dpfis...@adobe.com wrote:
I’m working on an application packaged as an OSGI bundle that would perform
some validation and
store some auxiliary data
of this
“special” EditorProvider in Oak.with(…) fix it?
Thanks
Dominique
On Jan 9, 2014, at 4:54 PM, Dominique Pfister
dpfis...@adobe.commailto:dpfis...@adobe.com wrote:
Hi Jukka,
On Jan 9, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Jukka Zitting
jukka.zitt...@gmail.commailto:jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 9
And here's my:
+1
Kind regards
Dominique
On Sep 13, 2012, at 5:09 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Philipp Marx (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:
Summary: MongoDB-based MicroKernel
This is a pretty major new feature so I'd like us to vote on whether
we want to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dominique Pfister resolved OAK-216.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Dominique Pfister
Issue was caused by a wrong assumption
Dominique Pfister created OAK-231:
-
Summary: Support for large child node lists.
Key: OAK-231
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-231
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dominique Pfister updated OAK-231:
--
Summary: Support for large child node lists (was: Support for large child
node lists
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dominique Pfister resolved OAK-187.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Dominique Pfister
Fixed in revision 1365621
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13406910#comment-13406910
]
Dominique Pfister edited comment on OAK-114 at 7/5/12 8:30 AM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13407201#comment-13407201
]
Dominique Pfister commented on OAK-114:
---
bq.{quote} If we are keeping track of when
Hi Michi,
Yes, Tom experienced the same issue yesterday. I'm gonna have a look.
Thanks
Dominique
On Jul 4, 2012, at 11:23 AM, Michael Dürig wrote:
Hi,
I got a ConcurrentModificationException while checking the 0.3 release.
This didn't cause any test case to fail but was printed to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13294366#comment-13294366
]
Dominique Pfister commented on OAK-138:
---
@Thomas: I agree that other MK implementations
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dominique Pfister updated OAK-138:
--
Description:
As a further cleanup step in OAK-13, I'd like to move the packages
o.a.j.mk.client
,
On 23.5.12 13:45, Dominique Pfister wrote:
Hi Michi,
On May 23, 2012, at 1:38 PM, Michael Dürig wrote:
Didn't see it again up to now. I'll keep an eye on it. Is there any log
data that would be helpful if this occurs again?
Unfortunately not (yet), if it reappears, I'll add a logger
Hi Michi,
On May 23, 2012, at 1:38 PM, Michael Dürig wrote:
Didn't see it again up to now. I'll keep an eye on it. Is there any log
data that would be helpful if this occurs again?
Unfortunately not (yet), if it reappears, I'll add a logger to the mk
subproject and log messages in the
Hi Michi,
Seen this, too, very rarely though. Anyway, I created an issue for this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-107
Cheers
Dominique
On May 21, 2012, at 11:41 PM, Michael Dürig wrote:
Hi,
About every third build fails for me:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-82?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13269615#comment-13269615
]
Dominique Pfister commented on OAK-82:
--
Oops, that rationale slipped my attention even
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-56?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13267331#comment-13267331
]
Dominique Pfister commented on OAK-56:
--
On a related note, what's the status
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-56?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13267334#comment-13267334
]
Dominique Pfister commented on OAK-56:
--
commons and rename the package
.
Regards
Dominique
On Apr 3, 2012, at 11:05 AM, Dominique Pfister wrote:
Hi,
On Apr 2, 2012, at 7:28 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Stefan Guggisberg
stefan.guggisb...@gmail.com wrote:
i don't think that we should allow clients to explicitly extend the life
Hi,
On Apr 3, 2012, at 11:51 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Dominique Pfister dpfis...@adobe.com wrote:
I made a second thought, and I'm no longer sure I would allow
a revision to be reachable by some client interaction.
You'd drop revision identifiers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13227428#comment-13227428
]
Dominique Pfister commented on OAK-5:
-
What about this, Tom: I use Eclipse, too, and if I
23 matches
Mail list logo
