Re: Backport of OAK-4933 to 1.6

2017-04-12 Thread Michael Dürig
On 12.04.17 09:17, Marcel Reutegger wrote: Hi, On 28/03/17 09:09, Michael Dürig wrote: As Marcel mentions on the issue a better approach would be to release this independently. If this is blocked by dependencies we should make an effort to sort this out, as now is the time in the release

Re: Backport of OAK-4933 to 1.6

2017-04-12 Thread Angela Schreiber
Hi Marcel Thanks for the summary. From my understanding the proposal additionally included the wish that we move forward with the modularisation and aims for independent releases for the oak-blob-azure module in trunk. See OAK-6069 [0] and subtask OAK-6073 [1] for the corresponding JIRA issue

Re: Backport of OAK-4933 to 1.6

2017-04-12 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, On 28/03/17 09:09, Michael Dürig wrote: As Marcel mentions on the issue a better approach would be to release this independently. If this is blocked by dependencies we should make an effort to sort this out, as now is the time in the release cycle for doing so. So for now -1 from my side

Re: Backport of OAK-4933 to 1.6

2017-03-30 Thread Michael Dürig
lear picture of the alternatives and >b) in the case of backporting, understand how we would ensure quality. >This is new code that was so far never exposed to the level of testing >people would expect from 1.6 code. > >Michael > >On 27.03.17 11:21,

Re: Backport of OAK-4933 to 1.6

2017-03-28 Thread Raul-Nicolae Hudea
;a) we have a clear picture of the alternatives and >b) in the case of backporting, understand how we would ensure quality. >This is new code that was so far never exposed to the level of testing >people would expect from 1.6 code. > >Michael > >On 27.

Re: Backport of OAK-4933 to 1.6

2017-03-28 Thread Angela Schreiber
; >On 27.03.17 11:21, Raul-Nicolae Hudea wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I would like to backport OAK-4933 to 1.6. The impact should be minimal >>since the changes are about bringing the AzureBlobStore connector to 1.6. >> >> Changes are: >> - new module >> - changes in oak-run to support the azure data store >> >> Thanks, >> Raul >> >>

Re: Backport of OAK-4933 to 1.6

2017-03-28 Thread Michael Dürig
exposed to the level of testing people would expect from 1.6 code. Michael On 27.03.17 11:21, Raul-Nicolae Hudea wrote: Hi, I would like to backport OAK-4933 to 1.6. The impact should be minimal since the changes are about bringing the AzureBlobStore connector to 1.6. Changes are: - new

Backport of OAK-4933 to 1.6

2017-03-27 Thread Raul-Nicolae Hudea
Hi, I would like to backport OAK-4933 to 1.6. The impact should be minimal since the changes are about bringing the AzureBlobStore connector to 1.6. Changes are: - new module - changes in oak-run to support the azure data store Thanks, Raul