On 12.04.17 09:17, Marcel Reutegger wrote:
Hi,
On 28/03/17 09:09, Michael Dürig wrote:
As Marcel mentions on the issue a better approach would be to release
this independently. If this is blocked by dependencies we should make an
effort to sort this out, as now is the time in the release
Hi Marcel
Thanks for the summary. From my understanding the proposal additionally
included the wish that we move forward with the modularisation and aims
for independent releases for the oak-blob-azure module in trunk.
See OAK-6069 [0] and subtask OAK-6073 [1] for the corresponding JIRA issue
Hi,
On 28/03/17 09:09, Michael Dürig wrote:
As Marcel mentions on the issue a better approach would be to release
this independently. If this is blocked by dependencies we should make an
effort to sort this out, as now is the time in the release cycle for
doing so.
So for now -1 from my side
lear picture of the alternatives and
>b) in the case of backporting, understand how we would ensure quality.
>This is new code that was so far never exposed to the level of testing
>people would expect from 1.6 code.
>
>Michael
>
>On 27.03.17 11:21,
;a) we have a clear picture of the alternatives and
>b) in the case of backporting, understand how we would ensure quality.
>This is new code that was so far never exposed to the level of testing
>people would expect from 1.6 code.
>
>Michael
>
>On 27.
;
>On 27.03.17 11:21, Raul-Nicolae Hudea wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to backport OAK-4933 to 1.6. The impact should be minimal
>>since the changes are about bringing the AzureBlobStore connector to 1.6.
>>
>> Changes are:
>> - new module
>> - changes in oak-run to support the azure data store
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Raul
>>
>>
exposed to the level of testing
people would expect from 1.6 code.
Michael
On 27.03.17 11:21, Raul-Nicolae Hudea wrote:
Hi,
I would like to backport OAK-4933 to 1.6. The impact should be minimal since
the changes are about bringing the AzureBlobStore connector to 1.6.
Changes are:
- new
Hi,
I would like to backport OAK-4933 to 1.6. The impact should be minimal since
the changes are about bringing the AzureBlobStore connector to 1.6.
Changes are:
- new module
- changes in oak-run to support the azure data store
Thanks,
Raul