Re: JCR API implementation transparency

2014-08-26 Thread Michael Dürig
On 26.8.14 7:14 , Tobias Bocanegra wrote: IMO, this should work, even if the value is not a ValueImpl. In this case, it should fall back to the API methods to read the binary. WDYT? Ack. This is most likely a regression introduces with OAK-1164. Michael

Re: JCR API implementation transparency

2014-08-25 Thread Chetan Mehrotra
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Tobias Bocanegra tri...@apache.org wrote: IMO, this should work, even if the value is not a ValueImpl. In this case, it should fall back to the API methods to read the binary. +1 Chetan Mehrotra

Re: JCR API implementation transparency

2014-08-25 Thread Tobias Bocanegra
fyi, I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2052 On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:32 PM, Chetan Mehrotra chetan.mehro...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Tobias Bocanegra tri...@apache.org wrote: IMO, this should work, even if the value is not a ValueImpl. In this