Re: JSOP vs JSON-Patch, was: [Jackrabbit Wiki] Update of Jsop by stefan

2012-03-21 Thread Stefan Guggisberg
sorry, i forgot to cc oak-dev. resending... On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de wrote: On 2012-03-21 13:47, Stefan Guggisberg wrote: On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Julian Reschkejulian.resc...@gmx.de  wrote: Hi, so Stefan is cleaning up the JSOP Wiki

Re: JSOP vs JSON-Patch, was: [Jackrabbit Wiki] Update of Jsop by stefan

2012-03-21 Thread Julian Reschke
On 2012-03-21 15:33, Stefan Guggisberg wrote: ... I assume it's needed for the commit message in MK, but that of course could be separated into a separate string argument. the commit msg is already passed as a separate argument in the commit method. Right. Thanks for clarifying.

Re: JSOP vs JSON-Patch, was: [Jackrabbit Wiki] Update of Jsop by stefan

2012-03-21 Thread Stefan Guggisberg
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de wrote: On 2012-03-21 16:28, Julian Reschke wrote: ... OK, here's an attempt to rewrite in IETF ABNF: great, thanks! -- snip -- diffs =   *( ws ( add / set / remove / move / copy / test ) ws ) add =     + ws pointer ws

JSOP vs JSON-Patch, was: [Jackrabbit Wiki] Update of Jsop by stefan

2012-03-20 Thread Julian Reschke
Hi, so Stefan is cleaning up the JSOP Wiki page (thanks!). I think it's time to look again at the difference between the JSOP diff format (as used in MK.commit()), and the IETF JSON Patch format, now http://trac.tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-01. JSOP has lost it's