On 27/08/2014 14:48, Thomas Mueller wrote:
Hi,
Could we use a new index type for the new format? For example ordered2
instead of ordered. I know not very creative naming :-)
This is a fix to the current index implementation. I think we should
stay with the current index.
I would prefer if
Hi,
Could we use a new index type for the new format? For example ordered2
instead of ordered. I know not very creative naming :-)
This is a fix to the current index implementation. I think we should
stay with the current index.
Well, we need some way to know whether the data was migrated or
Hello team,
as already tracked in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1763 the
ordered index does not comply to JCR's semantics.
We start seeing issues in (pre)production around it and therefore I
think we need a fix.
Unfortunately with the changes of the encoding and algorithm any
Hi,
Could we use a new index type for the new format? For example ordered2
instead of ordered. I know not very creative naming :-)
I would prefer if the translation is done automatically on restart or
re-index. I woudn't want to install Groovy and / or have to do manual
steps if possible.
