Re: identify abandoned oak modules

2017-11-27 Thread Davide Giannella
On 27/11/2017 11:42, Alex Deparvu wrote: > Why wait for the branch? Most of these modules have not been updated in a > while, why keep them around for another cycle? > I would move them to attic *before* the branch. It's just test coverage. If we do it after 1.8, we'll have a full year of cuts

Re: identify abandoned oak modules

2017-11-27 Thread Alex Deparvu
> I'd say we do that after the branching in time for 1.10. The 1.8 branching is planned on the 15th Jan Why wait for the branch? Most of these modules have not been updated in a while, why keep them around for another cycle? I would move them to attic *before* the branch. alex On Thu, Nov 23,

Re: identify abandoned oak modules

2017-11-23 Thread Davide Giannella
On 21/11/2017 14:56, Angela Schreiber wrote: > hi oak devs > > looking at the list of modules we have in oak/trunk i get the impression > that some are not actively worked on or maintained. > would it make sense or be possible to retire some of the modules that were > originally started for

Re: identify abandoned oak modules

2017-11-21 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi, On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Michael Dürig wrote: > ...Not exactly retiring but what about moving... FWIW, in Sling we are using an "attic" folder for such retired modules, see http://sling.apache.org/project-information.html#attic -Bertrand

Re: identify abandoned oak modules

2017-11-21 Thread Michael Dürig
Not exactly retiring but what about moving oak-pojosr under oak-examples? Michael On 21.11.17 16:53, Alex Deparvu wrote: I think we can also add 'oak-http' to the list. alex On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Francesco Mari wrote: I'm in favour of retiring

Re: identify abandoned oak modules

2017-11-21 Thread Alex Deparvu
I think we can also add 'oak-http' to the list. alex On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Francesco Mari wrote: > I'm in favour of retiring oak-remote. It is not currently used and it > didn't receive much attention in the recent past. > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 3:56 PM,

Re: identify abandoned oak modules

2017-11-21 Thread Francesco Mari
I'm in favour of retiring oak-remote. It is not currently used and it didn't receive much attention in the recent past. On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Angela Schreiber wrote: > hi oak devs > > looking at the list of modules we have in oak/trunk i get the impression >