Re: [Oak origin/trunk] Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix - Build # 381 - Failure

2015-09-07 Thread Michael Dürig
On 7.9.15 10:03 , Stefan Egli wrote: so perhaps it's a lease timeout case.. Any way to confirm this on Jenkins? E.g. could we place a println in front of it? Or replace it with a throws? Michael

Oak releases and profiles

2015-09-07 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, most of us probably use the automated release checker script we have for Jackrabbit and Oak releases. I recently noticed the check script returns rather quickly for Oak releases. It turns out this is due to profiles and configuration we have in Oak. The script runs 'mvn verify -Ppedantic'

Re: [Oak origin/trunk] Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix - Build # 381 - Failure

2015-09-07 Thread Stefan Egli
before it does the exit it issues a loud log.error - so we'd have to have access to the log output.. besides resolving OAK-3250 when we know a test fails because of it, the easiest is to disable the leaseCheck as eg done in [0] but now test results of '381' are deleted so we can't find out

Re: [Oak origin/trunk] Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix - Build # 381 - Failure

2015-09-07 Thread Stefan Egli
'... System.exit called ...' what we currently have until OAK-3250 is fixed is a System.exit when the lease cannot be updated. so perhaps it's a lease timeout case.. Cheers, Stefan On 31/08/15 16:00, "Michael Dürig" wrote: > >"The forked VM terminated without saying

Re: Oak releases and profiles

2015-09-07 Thread Davide Giannella
On 07/09/2015 11:08, Marcel Reutegger wrote: > ... > I would like to revert this change and run tests again > with the pedantic profile. This ensures we check the release > as documented in the README.md where users are instructed > to run 'mvn clean install' or 'mvn clean install

Re: Lucene Property Index and OR condition

2015-09-07 Thread Chetan Mehrotra
How did you performed the test? If you tested out with explain then current code in 1.0/1.2 return misleading result and this got fixed in trunk with OAK-2943. Technically Oak would convert the OR clause to a union query and then each part of union should then be able to make use of index. Chetan

Re: Lucene Property Index and OR condition

2015-09-07 Thread Burkhard Pauli
Hi Chetan, Thanks for your feedback. It was tested with version 1.0.15 which is part of AEM 6.0 SP2. Good to know that this is fixed now. Are you aware of any HF for version 1.0.x? Thanks Burkhard On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Chetan Mehrotra wrote: > How did you

Re: Lucene Property Index and OR condition

2015-09-07 Thread Davide Giannella
On 07/09/2015 14:32, Burkhard Pauli wrote: > ... > Question: Does the Lucene property index support or conditions? I tried > even with a oak property index without success. > I can be be totally wrong, so please take this carefully, but AFAIR lucene property index does not support ORs. This is

[Oak origin/1.0] Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix - Build # 398 - Still Failing

2015-09-07 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
The Apache Jenkins build system has built Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix (build #398) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Apache%20Jackrabbit%20Oak%20matrix/398/ to view the results. Changes: [mreutegg] OAK-3313: Many tests leak DocumentNodeStore

[Oak origin/1.2] Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix - Build # 397 - Still Failing

2015-09-07 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
The Apache Jenkins build system has built Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix (build #397) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Apache%20Jackrabbit%20Oak%20matrix/397/ to view the results. Changes: [mreutegg] OAK-3313: Many tests leak DocumentNodeStore