Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.0 (take 2)

On 2016-03-02 17:34, Davide Giannella wrote: ... [X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.0 Best regards, Julian

farewell 1.4 and welcome 1.6!

Hello team, as you may have seen oak 1.4.0 is out pending votes. This time let's hope for good! ;) So here we start a new development cycle. (Hooray!) Few info around *tentative* roadmap I scheduled 1.5.0 (unstable/trunk) for the 14th of March. Aiming to keep the pace with our current

Re: Critical questions about OAK

On 01/03/2016 15:33, Ancona Francesco wrote: > ...2. Oak esplicitally doesn’i index anything so what’s happens > when i search a document (or node) the first time ? (this is not clear) > > a. The search is delegated always on index server (lucene > embedded or solr) return a resultset

[VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.0 (take 2)

A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.0 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.4.0/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.4.0/ The SHA1 checksum of the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.2.12

[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.2.12 On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:06 AM, Amit Jain wrote: > A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.2.12 release is available at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.2.12/ > > The release candidate is

Re: svn commit: r1733227 - in /jackrabbit/oak/branches/1.4/oak-examples: standalone/pom.xml webapp/pom.xml

On 02/03/2016 07:54, mreut...@apache.org wrote: > Author: mreutegg > Date: Wed Mar 2 07:54:34 2016 > New Revision: 1733227 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1733227=rev > This unlocked the situation. Thanks Marcel. Didn't think about manually set it to 1.4.0-SNAPSHOT. I just tried and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.2.12

Hi, On 02/03/16 06:06, "Amit Jain" wrote: >Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.2.12. >The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at >least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.2.12

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:06 AM, Amit Jain wrote: > ... [X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.2.12 greetings dom.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.0 (take 2)

Hi, On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Davide Giannella wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.0. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. > +1 Release this

[Oak origin/trunk] Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix - Build # 776 - Still Failing

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix (build #776) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Apache%20Jackrabbit%20Oak%20matrix/776/ to view the results. Changes: [mreutegg] OAK-4073 - Release Oak 1.4.0 Test results: 1

[VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.0

A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.0 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.4.0/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.4.0/ The SHA1 checksum of the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.0

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Davide Giannella wrote: > ... [X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.0 greetings dom.

Re: critical question about oak: db connection

Hi, I see you keep having issues with getting a prototype up and running, but pasting the code in emails might be a bit off-putting for anyone looking to give you a hand. Might I suggest publishing the relevant bits (self contained project easy to run and see the error) to a GitHub repository?

R: critical question about oak: db connection

I’m not authorized to publish anything; could you give me a project that works ? Or could you point out the unit test in oak source code, can we use ? Thanks Best regards Da: Alex Parvulescu [mailto:alex.parvule...@gmail.com] Inviato: mercoledì 2 marzo 2016 12:22 A: Oak devs

Re: R: critical question about oak: db connection

Hi Francesco, Or could you point out the unit test in oak source code, can we use ? A natural starting point is org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.rbd.RDBDocumentStoreTest in oak-core. Best regards, Manfred On 3/2/2016 12:45 PM, Ancona Francesco wrote: I’m not authorized to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.0

[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.0 On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Davide Giannella wrote: > > A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.0 release is available at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.4.0/ > > The release

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.0

[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.0 Davide

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.28

Hi, The vote passes as follows: +1 Julian Reschke +1 Alex Parvulescu +1 Amit Jain +1 Marcel Reutegger +1 Davide Gianella +1 Dominique Jaeggi Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out. Regards Dom.

critical question about oak: db connection

We are using latest stable oak version In the case i'm sending you we have tried on postgres 9.4 We have simplified the class but now the error is the same we found on Oracle. Class connect to database and write a lot of system rows (system nodes...) but when i create repository there

Re: [1.4.0][blocked] oak-examples and circular dependencies on oak itself

Hi, On 02/03/16 08:36, "Marcel Reutegger" wrote: >On 01/03/16 18:21, "Davide Giannella" wrote: >>I'm kind-of stuck in the release process as oak-examples contains >>dependencies to oak-1.4-SNAPSHOT. The problem is the -SNAPSHOT bit. >> >>mvn release plugin complains about it as it's -SNAPSHOT and