OAK/AEM-SOLR indexing

Hi, Just need to know is there a way to tell OOTB OAK/AEM-SOLR indexing to send only the Activated content/nodes for indexing rather sending all the edits/updates to SOLR index Option1If any OOTB OAK-SOLR configs ? orOption2if not OOTB - Is there a way to plug an SOLRIndexEditior pre-processor

Re: [observation] pure internal or external listeners

On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Stefan Egli wrote: > If we > separate listeners into purely internal vs external, then a queue as a whole > is either purely internal or external and we no longer have this issue. Not sure here on how this would work. The observation queue

Re: [observation] pure internal or external listeners

That's an interesting approach. I kind of like it, especially as it provides a path to get rid of external listeners one day completely. Carsten > Hi, > > As you're probably aware there are currently several different issues being > worked upon related to the observation queue limit problem

Re: [observation] pure internal or external listeners

Hi Chetan, (see below) On 02/09/16 13:26, "Chetan Mehrotra" wrote: >On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Stefan Egli wrote: >> If we >> separate listeners into purely internal vs external, then a queue as a >>whole >> is either purely internal or

Re: [observation] pure internal or external listeners

On 02/09/16 13:41, "Stefan Egli" wrote: >On 02/09/16 13:26, "Chetan Mehrotra" wrote: > >>Listener for local Change >>-- >> >>Such a listener is more particular about type of change and is doing >>some persisted

Re: [observation] pure internal or external listeners

Perhaps for backwards compatibility we could auto-create 2 listeners for the case where a listener is registered without ExcludeInternal or ExcludeExternal - and issue a corresponding, loud, WARN. On 02/09/16 12:30, "Stefan Egli" wrote: >Hi, > >As you're probably aware