On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
> ...there is a goal in Oak to be less strict with regard to JCR spec
> compatibility which, in my opinion, makes a
> possibly important point of distinction.
> If this understanding is correct then I think it'd make sense to have
> separate
i'm feeling absolutly with angela.
like angela said I would also be afraid that jackrabbit has no future ...
what if we made it like the j2ee profiles. there is a full compliant profile
but also some lighter profiles.
we can make also profiles so that people can choose which profile they want us
hi tommaso
At the same time I see the community development concern; I'm still quite new
here so I don't have a clear understanding of who is actually working on both
Oak and Jackrabbit and who's working only on one of them, also it may be that
this distinction doesn't actually exist at the m
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder oak-trunk while building
ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/oak-trunk/builds/655
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: osiris_ubuntu
Build Reason: scheduler
Build Source Stamp
On 02/ott/2012, at 10:56, Marcel Reutegger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my preference is something like 2), but with the JCR related components
> moved to Jackrabbit. I'd like to see Oak as a hierarchical content repository
> implementation, but not necessarily as a JCR repository. The plugin mechanism
> in
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder oak-trunk while building ASF
Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/oak-trunk/builds/652
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: osiris_ubuntu
Build Reason: scheduler
Build Source Stamp: [
Hi Bart,
On 2.10.12 16:52, Bart van der Schans wrote:
I do agree that one day is rather short so probably two days would be
better. Ate and me will be at the ApacheCon (I'm not sure yet about
Unico and Ard) so we could have a (informal?) meeting/hacking session
there. November 19th to 23th mi
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:27 AM, wrote:
> +qs.add(bq);
+1! Nice catch! :-)
BR,
Jukka Zitting
