Re: normalising the rdb database schema

2016-08-16 Thread Chetan Mehrotra
Hi Tomek, I like the idea of revisiting our current schema based on usage so far. However couple of points around potential issue with such a normalized approach - This approach would lead to a thin and lng table. As noted in [1] in a small repo ~14 M nodes we have ~26 M properties. With

Re: Oak Indexing. Was Re: Property index replacement / evolution

2016-08-16 Thread Ard Schrijvers
Hey, I've caught up with all mails in this thread, and would like to make some general remarks. Admittedly, I do not yet work with oak and do not yet know much about its indexing strategy/implementation, but I do know quite some details about the old JR2 index implementation, about ES, about

Re: normalising the rdb database schema

2016-08-16 Thread Vikas Saurabh
Hi Tomek, While at first glance I like the idea of normalizing the schema, but there are potential practical issues with the approach: * It'd incur a very heavy migration impact on upgrade or RDB setups - that, most probably, would translate to us having to support both schemas. I don't feel that

normalising the rdb database schema

2016-08-16 Thread Tomek Rekawek
Hello, I was wondering whether it’d make sense to normalise the RDB Document Store schema - get rid of the JSON/JSOP concatenated strings and store each key/value in a separate database row. Something like this: id STRING key STRING revisionSTRING (nullable) value

Re: Cold standby for oak-segment-tar

2016-08-16 Thread Alex Parvulescu
Hi, The second option sounds best to me. alex On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Francesco Mari wrote: > Hi all, > > The cold standby functionality originally implemented for oak-segment > is currently unusable with oak-segment-tar. The cold standby requires > access to the

Re: unregister custom privilege

2016-08-16 Thread Angela Schreiber
Hi Marco See answers inline below On 13/08/16 13:25, "Marco Piovesana" wrote: >dear all, >I'm working with custom privileges, I did register a custom privilege >doing >this: > >PrivilegeManager privilegeManager = ((JackrabbitWorkspace)

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.2.18 released

2016-08-16 Thread Amit Jain
The Apache Jackrabbit community is pleased to announce the release of Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.2.18 The release is available for download at: http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html See the full release notes below for details about this release: Release Notes -- Apache Jackrabbit Oak --

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.2.18

2016-08-16 Thread Amit Jain
Hi, The vote passes as follows: +1 Dominique Jaeggi +1 Alex Parvulescu +1 Davide Giannella +1 Amit Jain Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out. Regards Amit