BUILD FAILURE: Jackrabbit Oak - Build # 871 - Still Failing

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Jackrabbit Oak (build #871) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/871/ to view the results. Changes: [chetanm] OAK-6810 - oak-pojosr tests fail with java 9 Updated to latest Groovy 2.4.12 with whic

BUILD FAILURE: Jackrabbit Oak - Build # 870 - Still Failing

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Jackrabbit Oak (build #870) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/870/ to view the results. Changes: [tommaso] OAK-6710 - added setting for max segs per mitigation, included query evaluation in ben

Re: Intent to backport OAK-6218

+1 (nonbinding) On October 10, 2017 at 9:23:26 AM, Chetan Mehrotra ( chetan.mehro...@gmail.com) wrote: +1 Chetan Mehrotra On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2017-10-10 17:16, Marcel Reutegger wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to backport OAK-6218 to the maintenance bran

BUILD FAILURE: Jackrabbit Oak - Build # 869 - Still Failing

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Jackrabbit Oak (build #869) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/869/ to view the results. Changes: [catholicon] OAK-6792: rep:facet not supported in xpath Not sure how I left out using XPATH. Mos

BUILD FAILURE: Jackrabbit Oak - Build # 868 - Still Failing

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Jackrabbit Oak (build #868) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/868/ to view the results. Changes: [catholicon] OAK-6792: rep:facet not supported in xpath Applying patch provided by Thomas Muelle

BUILD FAILURE: Jackrabbit Oak - Build # 867 - Still Failing

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Jackrabbit Oak (build #867) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/867/ to view the results. Changes: [reschke] OAK-1629: behavior for ultra-long node names (not paths) add test for creation that ei

BUILD FAILURE: Jackrabbit Oak - Build # 866 - Still Failing

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Jackrabbit Oak (build #866) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/866/ to view the results. Changes: [stillalex] OAK-6318 Refactor oak.spi.security into a separate module/bundle [reschke] OAK-6789:

BUILD FAILURE: Jackrabbit Oak - Build # 865 - Still Failing

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Jackrabbit Oak (build #865) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/865/ to view the results. Changes: [amitj] OAK-5983: BlobGC should log the amount of space reclaimed after GC run is done - Fixing

Re: [DISCUSS] SHA-512 in releases

On 2017-10-12 11:35, Davide Giannella wrote: On 11/10/2017 15:34, Julian Reschke wrote: - timing: maybe have at least one release with the current config before moving on? +1. what is that you would consider for releases. One oak trunk and one JR? would only oak trunk suffice? I think a sing

Re: [DISCUSS] SHA-512 in releases

On 11/10/2017 15:34, Julian Reschke wrote: > - timing: maybe have at least one release with the current config > before moving on? +1. what is that you would consider for releases. One oak trunk and one JR? would only oak trunk suffice? > - checking: would be good to check that we all have openss

BUILD FAILURE: Jackrabbit Oak - Build # 864 - Failure

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Jackrabbit Oak (build #864) Status: Failure Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/864/ to view the results. Changes: [chetanm] OAK-6803 - Provide a way to for persistent cache to determine which all nodes can be cached