The Apache Jackrabbit community is pleased to announce the release of
Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.2.28. The release is available for download at:
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html
See the full release notes below for details about this released:
Release Notes -- Apache Jackrabbit Oak
Hi,
The vote passes as follows:
+1 Julian Reschke
+1 Alex Deparvu
+1 Andrei Dulceanu
+1 Davide Giannella
+1 Amit Jain
Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out.
Regards
Amit
+1
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 5:11 PM, Marcel Reutegger
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to backport OAK-7176 to maintenance branches 1.8, 1.6 and 1.4. The
> issue is only minor and is unlikely to occur in practice, but it is clearly a
> violation of the RevisionVector
Hi,
I'd like to backport OAK-7176 to maintenance branches 1.8, 1.6 and 1.4. The
issue is only minor and is unlikely to occur in practice, but it is clearly a
violation of the RevisionVector contract. The fix is easy and low risk.
Regards
Marcel
+1
On 1/18/2018 11:08 AM, Davide Giannella wrote:
On 18/01/2018 05:56, Julian Reschke wrote:
So I believe this is fixed now - should we attempt a new release?
+1 as 1.0.40 won't be usable in OSGi environment.
D.
Hi,
something is wrong here. The Oak Documentation page now says 'Last
Published 2017-05-02' and 'Version 1.8-SNAPSHOT'. Did you forget to
update before you generated the site?
Regards
Marcel
On 18/01/18 12:08, thom...@apache.org wrote:
Author: thomasm
Date: Thu Jan 18 11:08:07 2018
New
Hello team,
I'm planning to cut Oak on Monday 22nd Jan.
If there are any objections please let me know. Otherwise I will
re-schedule any non-resolved issue for the next iteration.
Thanks
Davide
On 18/01/2018 05:56, Julian Reschke wrote:
> So I believe this is fixed now - should we attempt a new release?
+1 as 1.0.40 won't be usable in OSGi environment.
D.
On 18/01/18 06:56, Julian Reschke wrote:
On 2018-01-17 12:44, Julian Reschke wrote:
See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7167
So it seems we need to fix this, and start a new release cycle?
Feedback appreciated.
So I believe this is fixed now - should we attempt a new release?