Hello Team,
the vote fails as follows:
+1 Davide Giannella
+1 Tommaso Teofili
-1 Marcel Reutegger (wrong release notes)
Given the feedbacks and the wrong release notes this release is going to
be cancelled and will be taken on later on.
-- Davide
The Apache Jackrabbit community is pleased to announce the release of
Apache Jackrabbit Oak. The release is available for download at:
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html
See the full release notes below for details about this release:
Release Notes -- Apache Jackrabbit Oak --
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.25
D.
Hello Team,
the vote passes as follows:
+1 Julian Reschke
+1 Davide Giannella
+1 Woonsan Ko
+1 Amit Jain
Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out.
-- Davide
The Apache Jackrabbit community is pleased to announce the release of
Apache Jackrabbit Oak. The release is available for download at:
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html
See the full release notes below for details about this release:
Release Notes -- Apache Jackrabbit Oak --
Hello Team,
the vote passes as follows:
+1 Julian Reschke
+1 Davide Giannella
+1 Woonsan Ko
+1 Amit Jain
Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out.
-- Davide
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.8.15
D.
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.8.15 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.8.15/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.8.15/
The SHA1 checksum of
On 04/07/2019 21:18, Davide Giannella wrote:
> Hello team,
>
> I'm planning to cut Oak on either Monday 8th July or Tuesday or
> Wednesday depending on workload.
>
> If there are any objections please let me know. Otherwise I will
> re-schedule any non-resolved issue for the
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.25 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.4.25/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.4.25/
The SHA1 checksum of
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.10.3
D.
Hello team,
I'm planning to cut Oak on Thursday 10th July.
There were some missing backports that fail to have solr start up
properly in OSGi environments. Now they've been backported.
If there are any objections please let me know. Otherwise I will
re-schedule any non-resolved issue for the
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.10.3 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.10.3/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.10.3/
The SHA1 checksum of
On 05/07/2019 07:19, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Is there a good reason why we need to do three releases in the same
> week? Everybody should look at things that need to be backported, do the
> backports and run tests. This does not scale.
We aim for a regular cadence for each branch. However
Hello team,
I'm planning to cut Oak on either Monday 8th July or Tuesday or
Wednesday depending on workload.
If there are any objections please let me know. Otherwise I will
re-schedule any non-resolved issue for the next iteration.
Thanks
Davide
Hello team,
I'm planning to cut Oak on either Monday 8th July or Tuesday or
Wednesday depending on workload.
If there are any objections please let me know. Otherwise I will
re-schedule any non-resolved issue for the next iteration.
Thanks
Davide
Hello team,
I'm planning to cut Oak on either Monday 8th July or Tuesday or
Wednesday depending on workload.
If there are any objections please let me know. Otherwise I will
re-schedule any non-resolved issue for the next iteration.
Thanks
Davide
Hello team,
I'm planning to cut Oak on Monday 8th July.
If there are any objections please let me know. Otherwise I will
re-schedule any non-resolved issue for the next iteration.
Thanks
Davide
The Apache Jackrabbit community is pleased to announce the release of
Apache Jackrabbit Oak. The release is available for download at:
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html
See the full release notes below for details about this release:
Release Notes -- Apache Jackrabbit Oak --
Hello Team,
the vote passes as follows:
+1 Julian Reschke
+1 Davide Giannella
+1 Marcel Reutegger
+1 Woonsan Ko
Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out.
-- Davide
+1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.8.14
D.
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.8.14 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.8.14/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.8.14/
The SHA1 checksum of
Hello team,
I'm planning to cut Oak on Monday 1st July.
If there are any objections please let me know. Otherwise I will
re-schedule any non-resolved issue for the next iteration.
Thanks
Davide
Hello Team,
the vote passes as follows:
+1 Julian Reschke
+1 Matt Ryan
+1 Vikas Saurabh
+ Woonsan Ko
+1 Davide Giannella
Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out.
-- Davide
+1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.14.0
D.
+1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.14.0
D.
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.14.0 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.14.0/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.14.0/
The SHA1 checksum of
Hello team,
I'm planning to cut Oak later on in the afternoon BST.
If there are any objections please let me know. Otherwise I will
re-schedule any non-resolved issue for the next iteration.
Thanks
Davide
The Apache Jackrabbit community is pleased to announce the release of
Apache Jackrabbit Oak. The release is available for download at:
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html
See the full release notes below for details about this release:
Release Notes -- Apache Jackrabbit Oak --
Hello Team,
the vote passes as follows:
+1 Julian Reschke
+1 Alex Deparvu
+1 Davide Giannella
+1 Woonsan Ko
Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out.
-- Davide
Hello team,
I'm planning to cut Oak on later in the afternoon or tomorrow depending
on workload.
If there are any objections please let me know. Otherwise I will
re-schedule any non-resolved issue for the next iteration.
Thanks
Davide
On 03/05/2019 10:35, Angela Schreiber wrote:
> hi oak-devs
>
> for my recent work on OAK-8190 i would need the latest jackrabbit-api
> including the extension added with JCR-4429. looking that summary written by
> Davide recently (http://markmail.org/message/bndcm5jwfasj4otm) and on the oak
>
Hello Team,
the vote passes as follows:
+1 Julian Reschke
+1 Woonsan Ko
+1 Marcel Reutegger
+1 Davide Giannella
Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out.
-- Davide
The Apache Jackrabbit community is pleased to announce the release of
Apache Jackrabbit Oak. The release is available for download at:
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html
See the full release notes below for details about this release:
Release Notes -- Apache Jackrabbit Oak --
Hello Team,
the vote passes as follows:
+1 Woonsan Ko
+1 Julian Reschke
+1 Alex Deparvu
+1 Davide Giannella
Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out.
-- Davide
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.12.0
D.
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.12.0 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.12.0/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.12.0/
The SHA1 checksum of
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.6.17
D.
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.6.17 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.6.17/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.6.17/
The SHA1 checksum of
Hello team,
I'm planning to cut Oak on either Monday 8th or Tuesday 9th depending on
workload.
If there are any objections please let me know. Otherwise I will
re-schedule any non-resolved issue for the next iteration.
Thanks
Davide
Hello team,
I'm planning to cut Oak on Monday 8th April.
If there are any objections please let me know. Otherwise I will
re-schedule any non-resolved issue for the next iteration.
I will update the docs with the decisions we made around branching and
strategies today.
Thanks
Davide
On 28/03/2019 10:17, Marcel Reutegger wrote:
> There is still a fix version 1.11.0 in JIRA and resolved issues get that fix
> version in addition to 1.12. If there are no objections, I'd like to remove
> the 1.11.0 fix version from all resolved issues and the project as well.
> I don't see a
Good afternoon everyone,
here's a summary of what we discussed in previous threads:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/768807eed3379dc08921a1510264136ffe4a7a1230d9ca7881cc0a59@%3Coak-dev.jackrabbit.apache.org%3E
On 05/03/2019 10:18, Davide Giannella wrote:
> On 04/03/2019 13:31, Robert Munteanu wrote:
>> As you mentioned, we don't need to increase the major version whenever
>> we branch. I just wanted to clarify that since in this email thread
>> branching seems to be conflat
+1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.10.2
Davide
The Apache Jackrabbit community is pleased to announce the release of
Apache Jackrabbit Oak. The release is available for download at:
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html
See the full release notes below for details about this release:
Release Notes -- Apache Jackrabbit Oak --
The Apache Jackrabbit community is pleased to announce the release of
Apache Jackrabbit Oak. The release is available for download at:
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html
See the full release notes below for details about this release:
Release Notes -- Apache Jackrabbit Oak --
Hello Team,
the vote passes as follows:
+1 Alex Deparvu
+1 Davide Giannella
+1 Marcel Reutegger
+1 Julian Reschke
+1 Woosan Ko
Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out.
-- Davide
Hello Team,
the vote passes as follows:
+1 Julian Reschke
+1 Woosan Ko
+1 Marcel Reutegger
Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out.
-- Davide
Hello team,
I'm planning to cut Oak on Monday 18th March.
If there are any objections please let me know. Otherwise I will
re-schedule any non-resolved issue for the next iteration.
Thanks
Davide
Good afternoon team,
as we discussed in separate threads about strategies and version numbers
and we agreed in principles on the way forward we still have to address
one topic of the release: the frequency.
Was looking at what JDK does and merge it with our own experience.
JDK releases a new
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.2.31 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.2.31/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.2.31/
The SHA1 checksum of
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.8.12
D.
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.8.12 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.8.12/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.8.12/
The SHA1 checksum of
Hello team,
I'm planning to cut Oak on either Monday 11th March or Tuesday.
If there are any objections please let me know. Otherwise I will
re-schedule any non-resolved issue for the next iteration.
Thanks
Davide
Hello team,
I'm planning to cut Oak on Monday 11th March.
If there are any objections please let me know. Otherwise I will
re-schedule any non-resolved issue for the next iteration.
Thanks
Davide
On 04/03/2019 13:31, Robert Munteanu wrote:
> As you mentioned, we don't need to increase the major version whenever
> we branch. I just wanted to clarify that since in this email thread
> branching seems to be conflated with major version increases and that
> IMO not correct (and your reply seems
On 04/03/2019 12:43, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 01.03.2019 10:48, Davide Giannella wrote:
>> Good morning everyone,
>>
>> it looks like the strategy proposed in a previous post about future
>> branching and strategies[0] is good with everyone. Now it's time to
>>
On 04/03/2019 12:08, Robert Munteanu wrote:
> It all sounds reasonable to me. One comment regarding your example -
> branching does not necessarily force to increase the major component of
> the version.
>
> >From your initial email, one use case for having maintenance branches
> is to support
Good morning everyone,
it looks like the strategy proposed in a previous post about future
branching and strategies[0] is good with everyone. Now it's time to
discuss the version number schema we'd like to adopt.
Referring to https://semver.org/ which goes along what I was taught in
school we
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.10.1
D.
Hello team,
I'm planning to cut Oak on Monday 25th February.
If there are any objections please let me know. Otherwise I will
re-schedule any non-resolved issue for the next iteration.
Thanks
Davide
So much for having said... ;)
> Please let's focus on the process here and ignore the version number.
In-line as usual
On 20/02/2019 14:54, Marcel Reutegger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 20.02.19, 13:21, "Robert Munteanu" wrote:
>> On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 10:45 +, David
Good morning team,
there were some discussions face to face between some of the Oak team
members about the many branches we currently have to support and how we
could better support the changing world around releases of "tools" we
use. Most notably is the JVM support and release model from
Hello everyone,
As we have another branch to maintain I've just updated the release schedule
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/release-schedule.html
any concerns reply here :)
Regards
Davide
The Apache Jackrabbit community is pleased to announce the release of
Apache Jackrabbit Oak. The release is available for download at:
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html
See the full release notes below for details about this release:
Release Notes -- Apache Jackrabbit Oak --
Hello Team,
the vote passes as follows:
+1 Marcel Reutegger
+1 Julian Reschke
+1 Woonsan Ko
+1 Davide GIannella
+1 Matt Ryan
+1 Amit Jain
Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out.
-- Davide
Hello Team,
the vote passes as follows:
+1 Julian Reschke
+1 Woonsan Ko
+1 Davide Giannella
+1 Matt Ryan
Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out.
-- Davide
+1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.8.11
D.
+1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.10.0
D.
+1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.6.16
D.
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.10.0 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.10.0/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.10.0/
The SHA1 checksum of
Hello Team,
the vote FAILS as follows:
>From Tommaso
> while doing testing with trunk me and others have found out that the
> changes for OAK-7947 can cause a NPE in case
> LucenePropertyIndex#getIndexNode return null, therefore I think this
> needs to be fixed before releasing 1.10.0, hence my
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.6.16 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.6.16/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.6.16/
The SHA1 checksum of
Hello Team,
the vote FAILS as follows:
from Vikas
> [X] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> 1.6.16 currently has a bunch of fixes/improvements wrt facets. We
> recently discovered and fixed another facet related bug (OAK-7975
> [0]). It might be better to tag along this fix in 1.6.16
On 11/01/2019 15:04, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
> regarding the problem with OAK-7983, I think we can re spin the release now.
> I've reverted the problematic commit and me and Vikas will follow up
> with a patch which reintroduces the functionality from OAK-7947
> without the mentioned bug as soon as
Hello team,
I'm planning to cut Oak on Monday 14th Jan.
If there are any objections please let me know. Otherwise I will
re-schedule any non-resolved issue for the next iteration.
Thanks
Davide
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.10.0 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.10.0/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.10.0/
The SHA1 checksum of
On 10/01/2019 10:01, Vikas Saurabh wrote:
> Thinking further and some discussion off-list, I think releasing with
> some high-sev (query fails with no work-around) although low-prio (due
> to low chances of hitting the situation) known issue is probably not a
> good idea.
>
> I'm confirming my -1.
I've produced the release notes and will probably produce the official
cut tomorrow morning GMT.
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/branches/1.10/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
have a look and either commit or suggest any required change.
Cheers
Davide
On 09/01/2019 10:25, Vikas Saurabh wrote:
> I am tentatively voting -1 to bring up the discussion but I'm a fence
> sitter atm.
>
> [0]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7975
Thanks for bringing this one up Vikas. I'm tentatively going to count
the votes next Monday so you have until
+1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.6.16
D.
+1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.24
D.
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.6.16 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.6.16/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.6.16/
The SHA1 checksum of
On 04/01/2019 17:28, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2019-01-04 17:17, Matt Ryan wrote:
>> Hi Davide,
>>
>> It would be nice to include a fix for the documentation issue brought up
>> on-list by Alex Klimetschek a couple of weeks ago. It probably
>> shouldn't
>> block the release, but I'll see if I
Hello team,
I'm planning to cut Oak on either Monday 7th Jan or Tuesday or Wednesday
depending on workload.
If there are any objections please let me know. Otherwise I will
re-schedule any non-resolved issue for the next iteration.
Thanks
Davide
Hello team,
I'm planning to cut Oak on either Monday 7th Jan or Tuesday or Wednesday
depending on workload.
If there are any objections please let me know. Otherwise I will
re-schedule any non-resolved issue for the next iteration.
Thanks
Davide
Hello team,
I'm planning to branch 1.10 and cut 1.10.0 on Monday 7th Jan.
If there are any objections please let me know. Otherwise I will
re-schedule any non-resolved issue for the next iteration.
Thanks
Davide
Hello Team,
the vote passes as follows:
+1 Julian Reschke
+1 Matt Ryan
+1 Davide Giannella
+1 Woonsan Ko
Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out.
-- Davide
+1
D.
The Apache Jackrabbit community is pleased to announce the release of
Apache Jackrabbit Oak. The release is available for download at:
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html
See the full release notes below for details about this release:
Release Notes -- Apache Jackrabbit Oak --
Hello Team,
the vote passes as follows:
+1 Julian Reschke
+1 Davide Giannella
+1 Vikas Saurabh
+1 Marcel Reutegger
+1 Woonsan Ko
+1 Matt Ryan
Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out.
-- Davide
Hello team,
I'm planning to cut Oak on Monday 17th.
If there are any objections please let me know. Otherwise I will
re-schedule any non-resolved issue for the next iteration.
Thanks
Davide
On 11/12/2018 10:10, Francesco Mari wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 at 10:56, Davide Giannella wrote:
>
>> Does git change always HEAD? Even if you merge something that fits
>> "behind" HEAD.
>>
> Git always changes the head when a merge commit is
Hello Fra,
On 10/12/2018 14:28, Francesco Mari wrote:
> Using a version composed by based version, timestamp and commit hash works
> well. The qualifier is compared lexicographically, so the timestamp would
> do the trick regardless of the commit hash. See this example [1] on
> Versionatorr.
you
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.9.13 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.9.13/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.9.13/
The SHA1 checksum of
Hello team,
I'm planning to cut Oak on Monday 10th December.
If there are any objections please let me know. Otherwise I will
re-schedule any non-resolved issue for the next iteration.
Thanks
Davide
The Apache Jackrabbit community is pleased to announce the release of
Apache Jackrabbit Oak. The release is available for download at:
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html
See the full release notes below for details about this release:
Release Notes -- Apache Jackrabbit Oak --
Hello Team,
the vote passes as follows:
+1 Julian Reschke
+1 Davide Giannella
+1 Woosan Ko
Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out.
-- Davide
+1
D.
1 - 100 of 1101 matches
Mail list logo
