hi francesco,
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Francesco Mari
mari.france...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
since I don't have access to the wiki, I started to write down a draft
for the remote API in a public GitHub repository [1].
I didn't write much so far, but I invite every interested party
Stefan Guggisberg stefan.guggisb...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Francesco Mari
mari.france...@gmail.com wrote:
Should the API expose every authentication strategy implemented in
Oak?
which strategy should be supported by the remoting layer is something
that needs TBD.
i'd say we
hi adrien,
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Adrien Lamoureux
lamoureux.adr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
No one has responded to the issues I'm having with the MicroKernel.
sorry, missed that one.
the problem you're having ('str:' being prepended to ':blobid:...')
seems to be caused by a bug
in
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
I also tried including MongoMK results, but the benchmark got stuck in
ConcurrentReadTest. I'll re-try today and will file a bug if I
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Do we still need the oak-mk-perf component for something? We added it
in OAK-335, but have since implemented a much more comprehensive set
of benchmarks in oak-run.
It doesn't seem as if the code is still
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 3:57 PM, julian.resc...@gmx.de
julian.resc...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2013-11-21 10:55, ste...@apache.org wrote:
...
Modified:
jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-mk/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/mk/MicroKernelImplTest.java
URL:
hi tommaso
the javadoc of org.apache.jackrabbit.mk.api.MicroKernel specifies the
API contract.
org.apache.jackrabbit.mk.test.MicroKernelIT is the integration test
which verifies
whether an implementation obeys the contract.
org.apache.jackrabbit.mk.core.MicroKernelImpl serves as a reference
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 6:43 AM, Stefan Guggisberg
stefan.guggisb...@gmail.com wrote:
SNNP was introduced with JSR 283, mainly due to pressure from vendors with
legacy systems. we (day) were opposed since SNNP
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Tobias Bocanegra tri...@apache.org wrote:
I don't know anymore where I heard/read this, but I had the
assumption, that oak will no longer support properties and child nodes
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
wrote:
I've now spent a few days drafting some initial implementation code to
see how such a design would work in practice.
Fast forward
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Alex Parvulescu
alex.parvule...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
For OAK-624 I needed to compare the test run times between 2 different mk
implementations so I came up with a script that computes the percentage
difference between the 2 'mvn test' runs.
This allows for
cheers
stefan
-Mete
On 1/7/13 5:11 PM, Stefan Guggisberg stefan.guggisb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Marcel Reutegger mreut...@adobe.com
wrote:
Hi,
while working on OAK-535 I noticed that MongoMK.getHeadRevision()
may also return the revision of a branch commit
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
Currently the Microkernel contract does not specify a merge policy but is
free to try to merge conflicting changes or throw an exception. I think this
is problematic in various ways:
1) Automatic merging may
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote:
This is a bit more complicated. In fact it is the other way around: if two
journal entries commute, the corresponding differences on the nodes due not
conflict regarding the definition I gave.
OTOH non conflicting
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Michael Dürig mic...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18.12.12 11:30, Stefan Guggisberg wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
Currently the Microkernel contract does not specify a merge policy but is
free to try to merge
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote:
On 18.12.12 16:05, Mete Atamel wrote:
In MongoMK, getJournal basically returns the jsonDiff from the commit, at
least in the simple case when there is no path to filter.
And AFAIK this is the same for the H2 MK.
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Stefan Guggisberg
stefan.guggisb...@gmail.com wrote:
- do you have a proposal for the suggested
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Stefan Guggisberg
stefan.guggisb...@gmail.com wrote:
- returning an :id and/or :hash should be optional, i.e. we shouldn't
require an implementation to return an :id or :hash
hi jukka
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
A lot of functionality in Oak (node states, the diff and hook
mechanisms, etc.) are based on walking down the tree hierarchy one
level at a time. To do this, for example to access changes below
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This came up earlier in the Berlin Oakathon and we're now facing it
also with the property index. Basically, do we want to add explicit
support for long ( 1k values) multivalued properties?
Currently such
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Mete Atamel mata...@adobe.com wrote:
Hi,
On 11/6/12 9:24 AM, Thomas Mueller muel...@adobe.com wrote:
Yes. Somebody has to decide which revisions are no longer needed. Luckily
it doesn't need to be us :-) We might set a default value (10 minutes or
so), and then
or
separate issues, not sure.
excellent, i'll check.
thanks
stefan
-Mete
[0]
https://github.com/meteatamel/jackrabbit-oak/blob/6b4635edc5908f346f5bc0e35
4cf2563d6aa6da7/oak-mongomk/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/mongomk/imp
l/MongoMKBranchMergeTest.java
On 10/25/12 3:55 PM, Stefan
]
https://github.com/meteatamel/jackrabbit-oak/blob/6b4635edc5908f346f5bc0e35
4cf2563d6aa6da7/oak-mongomk/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/mongomk/imp
l/MongoMKBranchMergeTest.java
On 10/25/12 3:55 PM, Stefan Guggisberg stefan.guggisb...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:38 PM
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Mete Atamel mata...@adobe.com wrote:
Hi,
I think I found a bug with branch/merge in MicroKernelImpl but wanted to
make sure. The last assert in the test fails. Could someone verify that
this is indeed a bug?
thanks, i'll have a look.
cheers
stefan
@Test
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
As you may have noticed from my work in OAK-352, we now have pretty
clean and simple mechanism for constructing repositories with
different combinations of pluggable components. Here's a quick guide
on how to
:49, Stefan Guggisberg wrote:
i agree that the ambiguity of '^' vs '+' is confusing. personally i'd
prefer
to get rid of the '+' syntax for property creation altogether. as a
consequence we'd loose the ability to generate PROPERTY_ADDED events
from the mk journal. i don't know whether that's
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote:
I wonder why the Microkernel API has an asymmetry here: for writing a binary
you can pass a stream where as for reading you need to pass a byte array.
the write method implies a content-addressable storage for blobs,
hi mete
i'm copying the oak-dev list since this might be of interest to others.
comments follow inline...
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Mete Atamel mata...@adobe.com wrote:
Hi Stefan,
One thing that I've been wanting to ask you is the distinction between
StagedNode vs. StoredNode. I see
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Mete Atamel mata...@adobe.com wrote:
Hi,
I have 2 questions on MicroKernel add/set property that MicroKernel
JavaDoc does not seem to answer.
1- What's the difference between adding a property vs. setting a property?
Are the two following commits basically
of the '+' syntax for property creation altogether. as a
consequence we'd loose the ability to generate PROPERTY_ADDED events
from the mk journal. i don't know whether that's a problem for the
current oak-core implementation.
opinions?
cheers
stefan
-Mete
On 10/17/12 2:58 PM, Stefan Guggisberg
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote:
On 17.10.12 15:49, Stefan Guggisberg wrote:
i agree that the ambiguity of '^' vs '+' is confusing. personally i'd
prefer
to get rid of the '+' syntax for property creation altogether. as a
consequence we'd loose
+1 to the Bertrand's suggestion same project name, different software name
cheers
stefan
On 28.09.2012, at 11:05, Mete Atamel mata...@adobe.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a question with JSOP diff syntax. Say I want to add a node a with
a property and value. This is the diff I use in the commit:
diff.append(+\a\ : {\prop\ : \value\});
Is it legal to add a and then add its
hi marcel
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Marcel Reutegger mreut...@adobe.com wrote:
hi all,
while looking through the oak code and also in light of the
recent MongoDB based MicroKernel, I was wondering where
the process boundaries are. right now with the maven build
everything runs in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13440422#comment-13440422
]
Stefan Guggisberg commented on OAK-267:
---
while i still can't explain how a private
Stefan Guggisberg created OAK-272:
-
Summary: every session login causes a mk.branch operation
Key: OAK-272
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-272
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-11?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13438508#comment-13438508
]
Stefan Guggisberg commented on OAK-11:
--
+1 for julian's proposal
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-11?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13438550#comment-13438550
]
Stefan Guggisberg commented on OAK-11:
--
bq. getLength method is kind of vague too
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg resolved OAK-264.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.5
good point!
fixed in svn r1375476
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg reassigned OAK-265:
-
Assignee: Stefan Guggisberg
waitForCommit gets triggered on private branch commits
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg resolved OAK-254.
---
Resolution: Fixed
fixed in svn r1374228
waitForCommit returns null in certain
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg resolved OAK-239.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.5
fixed in svn r1372850
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg updated OAK-227:
--
Description:
a depth parameter allows to specify how deep changes should be included
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg resolved OAK-227.
---
Resolution: Fixed
fixed in svn r1369019
MicroKernel API: add depth parameter
nice!
+1 for #2
cheers
stefan
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We had a chance to ask a real designer (instead of just me and my two
left eyes) take a look at improving the design of the Oak website. He
came up with screenshots of two
Stefan Guggisberg created OAK-227:
-
Summary: add depth parameter to MicroKernel#diff method
Key: OAK-227
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-227
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg updated OAK-227:
--
Summary: MicroKernel API: add depth parameter to diff method (was: add
depth parameter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-77?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg updated OAK-77:
-
Component/s: (was: mk)
removing mk component, there are IMO no redundant utility classes anymore
Stefan Guggisberg created OAK-210:
-
Summary: granularity of persisted data
Key: OAK-210
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-210
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg reassigned OAK-210:
-
Assignee: Stefan Guggisberg
granularity of persisted data
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13423864#comment-13423864
]
Stefan Guggisberg commented on OAK-210:
---
bq. Do you see this as something
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg updated OAK-210:
--
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug)
granularity of persisted data
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Stefan Guggisberg
stefan.guggisb...@gmail.com wrote:
implementing the transient space in Oak-Core is
legitimate, although premature optimization for
the specific use case
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13410324#comment-13410324
]
Stefan Guggisberg commented on OAK-169:
---
FWIW: here's the relevant discussion
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13410364#comment-13410364
]
Stefan Guggisberg commented on OAK-169:
---
bq. There is currently no statement about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13406581#comment-13406581
]
Stefan Guggisberg edited comment on OAK-167 at 7/5/12 8:44 AM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13407028#comment-13407028
]
Stefan Guggisberg commented on OAK-167:
---
IMO we have no choice but buffer transient
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13407038#comment-13407038
]
Stefan Guggisberg commented on OAK-167:
---
bq. That's a separate issue (OAK-162 as you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13406581#comment-13406581
]
Stefan Guggisberg commented on OAK-167:
---
Such a NodeStore implementation could also
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
Last week some of us met for another small Oakathon in Basel. Below is a
list of topics that where touched and worked on and the related Jira issues.
Any additional input is appreciated.
- Observation (OAK-144):
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13406609#comment-13406609
]
Stefan Guggisberg commented on OAK-114:
---
Would it be possible to change for at least
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg updated OAK-114:
--
Fix Version/s: 0.3
Assignee: Stefan Guggisberg
MicroKernel API: specify retention
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 4:15 AM, Travis-CI notificati...@travis-ci.org
wrote:
View the full build log and details:
http://travis-ci.org/apache/jackrabbit-oak/builds/1741471
The build says:
Failed tests:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Stefan Guggisberg
stefan.guggisb...@gmail.com wrote:
well, statements like the following lead me to this assumption:
OK, I can see how I could have given such an impression
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Felix Meschberger fmesc...@adobe.com wrote:
How about remotely located oak-jcr installs ?
As in: oak-jcr on box X talking to oak-core on box Y. This should probably
be able
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Angela Schreiber anch...@adobe.com wrote:
i don't fully see the use case for such long living sessions.
The rationale is the same as for the branch feature we added to the
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Felix Meschberger fmesc...@adobe.com wrote:
Hi,
Am 27.06.2012 um 11:20 schrieb Jukka Zitting:
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Angela Schreiber anch...@adobe.com wrote:
i don't fully see the use case for such long living sessions.
FWIW, this was my
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Stefan Guggisberg
stefan.guggisb...@gmail.com wrote:
now your proposal seems to imply a different architecture...
You're reading far too much into this.
well, statements like
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2012-06-20 09:05, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Travis-CI notificati...@travis-ci.org
wrote:
Run tests on Oracle's Java 7 and on OpenJDK 6. Seems like we hit some
OpenJDK core dump
Stefan Guggisberg created OAK-142:
-
Summary: MicroKernel API: returning the :hash should be optional
Key: OAK-142
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-142
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg updated OAK-142:
--
Summary: MicroKernel API: returning the :hash property should be optional
(was: MicroKernel API
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg resolved OAK-142.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.3
Assignee: Stefan Guggisberg
fixed in svn
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg updated OAK-142:
--
Component/s: mk
MicroKernel API: returning the :hash property should be optional
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg resolved OAK-130.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.3
fixed in svn r1350198
Unexpected
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13294307#comment-13294307
]
Stefan Guggisberg commented on OAK-138:
---
It also contains the MicroKernel API itself
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg updated OAK-130:
--
Summary: Unexpected result of MicroKernel#getJournal after
MicroKernel#merge (was: Unexpected
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-32?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg resolved OAK-32.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.3
Assignee: Stefan Guggisberg
fixed as proposed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-32?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13287381#comment-13287381
]
Stefan Guggisberg edited comment on OAK-32 at 6/1/12 1:14 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-32?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13287381#comment-13287381
]
Stefan Guggisberg edited comment on OAK-32 at 6/1/12 2:09 PM
Stefan Guggisberg created OAK-126:
-
Summary: remove unused code
Key: OAK-126
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-126
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-56?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg resolved OAK-56.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
resolving as won't fix for now, as discussed with thomas off-list.
we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-13?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg updated OAK-13:
-
Component/s: (was: mk)
core
Cleanup org.apache.jackrabbit.mk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-32?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg updated OAK-32:
-
Attachment: OAK-32.patch
proposed patch
Drop MicroKernel.dispose
Stefan Guggisberg created OAK-117:
-
Summary: MicroKernel API: add delete(String blobId) method
Key: OAK-117
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-117
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg reassigned OAK-117:
-
Assignee: Stefan Guggisberg
MicroKernel API: add delete(String blobId) method
Stefan Guggisberg created OAK-113:
-
Summary: drop MicroKernel getNodes(String, String) convenience
signature
Key: OAK-113
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-113
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Stefan Guggisberg created OAK-114:
-
Summary: MicroKernel API: specify retention policy for old
revisions
Key: OAK-114
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-114
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg reassigned OAK-116:
-
Assignee: Stefan Guggisberg
MicroKernel API: clarify semantics of getNodes depth
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote:
---
Test set: org.apache.jackrabbit.mk.test.EverythingIT
---
Tests
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote:
On 23.5.12 10:21, Stefan Guggisberg wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Michael Dürigmdue...@apache.org
wrote:
---
Test set
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-75?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13281630#comment-13281630
]
Stefan Guggisberg edited comment on OAK-75 at 5/23/12 2:38 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-75?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13281630#comment-13281630
]
Stefan Guggisberg edited comment on OAK-75 at 5/23/12 2:40 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-75?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13281630#comment-13281630
]
Stefan Guggisberg edited comment on OAK-75 at 5/23/12 2:41 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-75?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13281630#comment-13281630
]
Stefan Guggisberg edited comment on OAK-75 at 5/23/12 2:43 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-45?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg resolved OAK-45.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.3
there's javadoc, a basic integration test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-12?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg resolved OAK-12.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.3
MicroKernelIT covers all MicroKernel API methods
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-32?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg updated OAK-32:
-
Component/s: mk
Drop MicroKernel.dispose()
--
Key
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg updated OAK-107:
--
Component/s: mk
testConcurrentMergeGC fails intermittently
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote:
On 15.5.12 16:23, ste...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stefan
Date: Tue May 15 15:23:34 2012
New Revision: 1338749
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1338749view=rev
Log:
OAK-75: specify format and semantics of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-83?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Guggisberg resolved OAK-83.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.3
fixed in svn r1333899
Copy operation
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
