cool, let’s go with this, then :-)
On 13 Jun 2015, at 07:14, Tobias Bocanegra tri...@apache.org wrote:
btw: I worked on OAK-2948 and moved the SyncContext to an exported
package. the copy-paste overhead of a new synchandler is now minimal,
and you can then just extend from the
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Nicolas Peltier npelt...@adobe.com wrote:
Hi Tobias,
as discussed off list, this defaultsynchandler customisation discussion we
had joins the one started here [0]. So i’ll dump my findings, and we can see
in which directions to go (or in which direction
btw: I worked on OAK-2948 and moved the SyncContext to an exported
package. the copy-paste overhead of a new synchandler is now minimal,
and you can then just extend from the DefaultSyncContext. let me know
if you need more override points.
regards, toby
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Tobias
Hi Tobias,
as discussed off list, this defaultsynchandler customisation discussion we had
joins the one started here [0]. So i’ll dump my findings, and we can see in
which directions to go (or in which direction patches are the more welcome ;-)
First, as is, it’s not about making only this
