On 3 December 2015 at 04:15, Chetan Mehrotra
wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Ian Boston wrote:
> > Hence all MutableTrees get their
> > NodeBuilder from the root DocumentNodeState that is the DocumentNodeStore
> > owning the root
Hi Ian,
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Ian Boston wrote:
> Hence all MutableTrees get their
> NodeBuilder from the root DocumentNodeState that is the DocumentNodeStore
> owning the root node and not the MultiplexingDocumentNodeStore.
Some confusion here. What we have is a
t;ianbos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to enhance a multiplexing document store written initially by
> Robert Munteanu to support multiplexing of content under /jcr:system/** in
> particular the version store and the permissions store. I have a scheme
> that should theore
Hi Robert,
On 5 November 2015 at 22:58, Robert Munteanu <romb...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> On Fri, 2015-10-30 at 15:38 +, Ian Boston wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I am trying to enhance a multiplexing document store written
> > initially by
> > Robert Munt
Hi Ian,
On Fri, 2015-10-30 at 15:38 +, Ian Boston wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to enhance a multiplexing document store written
> initially by
> Robert Munteanu to support multiplexing of content under
> /jcr:system/** in
> particular the version store and the permiss
Hi,
I am trying to enhance a multiplexing document store written initially by
Robert Munteanu to support multiplexing of content under /jcr:system/** in
particular the version store and the permissions store. I have a scheme
that should theoretically work, encoding the target store in the entry
Hi,
I am trying to enhance a multiplexing document store written initially by
Robert Munteanu to support multiplexing of content under /jcr:system/** in
particular the version store and the permissions store. I have a scheme
that should theoretically work, encoding the target store in the entry