Hi Julian
Yes... trunk only... I don't think there will be an urgent request for
backport... but I might be mistaken.
As far as the existing broken impl is concerned: I don't have a strong
opinion here. We could remove it to give room for a proper
implementation... some times it's easier to
On 2017-04-05 15:34, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
hi Angela,
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Angela Schreiber wrote:
...Does no reply mean that everyone agrees with the proposed steps? :-)...
I missed it but as an Oak user +1 to the below suggestion, it makes
things clear
hi Angela,
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Angela Schreiber wrote:
> ...Does no reply mean that everyone agrees with the proposed steps? :-)...
I missed it but as an Oak user +1 to the below suggestion, it makes
things clear ;-)
> On 22/03/17 10:35, "Angela Schreiber"
Hi
Does no reply mean that everyone agrees with the proposed steps? :-)
Kind regards
Angela
On 22/03/17 10:35, "Angela Schreiber" wrote:
>Hi Oak-Devs
>
>I just had another discussion with a colleague of mine asking why JCR
>locking is not properly implemented in Oak.