[Oak origin/1.4] Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix - Build # 1254 - Still Failing

2016-11-01 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
The Apache Jenkins build system has built Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix (build #1254) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Apache%20Jackrabbit%20Oak%20matrix/1254/ to view the results. Changes: [frm] OAK-4969 - Ensure binary properties are loaded when

Deprecate oak-segment and oak-tarmk-standby

2016-11-01 Thread Francesco Mari
Hi, This is a heads up for the deprecation oak-segment and oak-tarmk-standby. The new oak-segment-tar module is a replacement for both of the aforementioned modules. If somebody is concerned about the deprecation, please let me know.

[Oak origin/1.2] Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix - Build # 1255 - Still Failing

2016-11-01 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
The Apache Jenkins build system has built Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix (build #1255) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Apache%20Jackrabbit%20Oak%20matrix/1255/ to view the results. Changes: [frm] OAK-4969 - Ensure binary properties are loaded when

Re: Deprecate oak-segment and oak-tarmk-standby

2016-11-01 Thread Robert Munteanu
Hi Francesco, On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 10:16 +0100, Francesco Mari wrote: > Hi, > > This is a heads up for the deprecation oak-segment and > oak-tarmk-standby. The new oak-segment-tar module is a replacement > for > both of the aforementioned modules. If somebody is concerned about > the >

Re: Deprecate oak-segment and oak-tarmk-standby

2016-11-01 Thread Robert Munteanu
Thanks Francesco and Michael, all clear now for me. Robert On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 11:47 +0100, Michael Dürig wrote: > > On 1.11.16 11:44 , Francesco Mari wrote: > > > 2. What is the migration strategy for deployments using oak- > > > segment? > > > > Just use oak-segment-tar instead of

Re: Deprecate oak-segment and oak-tarmk-standby

2016-11-01 Thread Michael Dürig
On 1.11.16 11:44 , Francesco Mari wrote: 2. What is the migration strategy for deployments using oak-segment? Just use oak-segment-tar instead of oak-segment and oak-tarmk-standby. It is almost a trivial replacement, except for some minor details that will be covered in the documentation.

Re: Deprecate oak-segment and oak-tarmk-standby

2016-11-01 Thread Julian Reschke
On 2016-11-01 11:44, Francesco Mari wrote: Hi, 2016-11-01 11:38 GMT+01:00 Robert Munteanu : Hi Francesco, On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 10:16 +0100, Francesco Mari wrote: Hi, This is a heads up for the deprecation oak-segment and oak-tarmk-standby. The new oak-segment-tar module

Re: Deprecate oak-segment and oak-tarmk-standby

2016-11-01 Thread Francesco Mari
Hi, 2016-11-01 11:38 GMT+01:00 Robert Munteanu : > Hi Francesco, > > On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 10:16 +0100, Francesco Mari wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This is a heads up for the deprecation oak-segment and >> oak-tarmk-standby. The new oak-segment-tar module is a replacement >> for >>

Re: Deprecate oak-segment and oak-tarmk-standby

2016-11-01 Thread Francesco Mari
The other solution will be to keep oak-segment and oak-tarmk-standby as deprecated modules in 1.6.x and remove them in 1.8. 2016-11-01 14:00 GMT+01:00 Francesco Mari : > 2016-11-01 12:56 GMT+01:00 Julian Reschke : >> On 2016-11-01 11:44, Francesco

Re: Deprecate oak-segment and oak-tarmk-standby

2016-11-01 Thread Francesco Mari
2016-11-01 12:56 GMT+01:00 Julian Reschke : > On 2016-11-01 11:44, Francesco Mari wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> 2016-11-01 11:38 GMT+01:00 Robert Munteanu : >>> >>> Hi Francesco, >>> >>> On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 10:16 +0100, Francesco Mari wrote: Hi,