Hey Thomas
Yeah I found that one :) I decided to make my own one to make sure not to run
in to trouble when upgrading to a newer version. Thanks for all the info!
Greets,
Roy
> On 19 Oct 2016, at 08:27, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> There is the "nodetype" index (/oak:index/nodetype) whic
Hi,
There is the "nodetype" index (/oak:index/nodetype) which is normally used
for such queries. I would change that index.
Regards,
Thomas
On 18/10/16 17:08, "Roy Teeuwen" wrote:
>Hey Thomas,
>
>Ok perfect, laying an oak:QueryIndexDefinition on propertyNames
>jcr:primaryType and declaringNod
Hey Thomas,
Ok perfect, laying an oak:QueryIndexDefinition on propertyNames jcr:primaryType
and declaringNodeTypes rep:ACL solved the issue.
I presumed there already was an index for all the existing jcr:primaryTypes :),
not that you have to specifically have them in the declaringNodeTypes
Tha
Hi,
> I really don¹t see the reason why this could be such a hard query
Who said it's a hard query? :-)
Is the problem performance, or is the problem that you get an exception?
If the problem is performance, then you need an index on the node type
rep:ACL.
If the problem is the exception: In
Hello all,
I got a problem in oak concerning query performance for the following simple
queries
SELECT * FROM [rep:ACL] WHERE ISDESCENDANTNODE([/content])
SELECT * FROM [rep:ACL] WHERE ISDESCENDANTNODE([/var])
I get the following exception:
java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: The query
