[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16695626#comment-16695626
]
Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-7910:
-
I think the changes in the TypeEditor and NameValidator (those
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7862?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alex Deparvu updated OAK-7862:
--
Labels: candidate_oak_1_6 (was: )
> Make PermissionEntryCache more resilient against OOME (1.8)
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16695613#comment-16695613
]
Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-7910:
-
[~rombert] yes, sure. Each index looks about like this (only
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16694969#comment-16694969
]
Robert Munteanu commented on OAK-7910:
--
[~tmueller] - does the index being created include paths from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16694961#comment-16694961
]
Robert Munteanu commented on OAK-7906:
--
Another data point:
{noformat}[INFO]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6756?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16694958#comment-16694958
]
angela edited comment on OAK-6756 at 11/21/18 5:15 PM:
---
[~jsedding], i am a bit lost
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6756?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16694958#comment-16694958
]
angela commented on OAK-6756:
-
[~jsedding], i am a bit lost with the report. i got your tool and ran it on a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16694856#comment-16694856
]
Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-7910:
-
[~tomek.rekawek] and [~rombert], your feedback would be very
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16694840#comment-16694840
]
Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-7910:
-
With the patch, it's now possible to create a new Lucene index
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16694833#comment-16694833
]
Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-7910:
-
Interestingly, no test case in the composite node store is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16694831#comment-16694831
]
Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-7910:
-
Looks like the code is trying to index /apps, which tries to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16694812#comment-16694812
]
Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-7910:
-
Performance issue fixed in svn.apache.org/r1847115
> Composite
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16694803#comment-16694803
]
Francesco Mari commented on OAK-7866:
-
I committed a first implementation of the {{recover-journal}}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16694807#comment-16694807
]
Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-7910:
-
I think the case where no index exists in the read-only
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16694784#comment-16694784
]
Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-7910:
-
When trying to create a new index that has no corresponding
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16694770#comment-16694770
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-7906:
-
I can reproduce the issue on the Windows Linux subsystem as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16694781#comment-16694781
]
Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-7910:
-
Thanks [~tomek.rekawek]! I will try that.
The log file when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7908?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16694700#comment-16694700
]
Michael Dürig commented on OAK-7908:
Longevity test running internally at Adobe. ETA Dec. 5th.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16694701#comment-16694701
]
Tomek Rękawek commented on OAK-7910:
WRT to the mounted paths, the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16694699#comment-16694699
]
Michael Dürig commented on OAK-7909:
Longevity test running internally at Adobe. ETA Dec. 5th.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16694678#comment-16694678
]
Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-7910:
-
The patch I have (a hack right now) is:
{noformat}
Index:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16694660#comment-16694660
]
Robert Munteanu commented on OAK-7910:
--
[~tmueller] - a separate test would be best I think. I am not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7913?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16694669#comment-16694669
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-7913:
-
trunk: [r1847096|http://svn.apache.org/r1847096]
> Update
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7913?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julian Reschke updated OAK-7913:
Labels: candidate_oak_1_8 (was: )
> Update failsafe and surefire versions to 2.22.1
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7913?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julian Reschke resolved OAK-7913.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.9.12
> Update failsafe and surefire versions to 2.22.1
>
Julian Reschke created OAK-7913:
---
Summary: Update failsafe and surefire versions to 2.22.1
Key: OAK-7913
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7913
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16694578#comment-16694578
]
Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-7910:
-
Thanks [~rombert], I think a test case in CompositeNodeStoreTest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16694572#comment-16694572
]
Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-7910:
-
[~stillalex] that's a really, really good question. I think with
Julian Reschke created OAK-7912:
---
Summary: ValidNamesTest: potential NPE in teardown
Key: OAK-7912
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7912
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julian Reschke updated OAK-7912:
Labels: candidate_oak_1_8 (was: )
> ValidNamesTest: potential NPE in teardown
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julian Reschke resolved OAK-7912.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.9.12
> ValidNamesTest: potential NPE in teardown
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7911?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16694525#comment-16694525
]
Vikas Saurabh commented on OAK-7911:
I think we can check on each iteration. The logic of doing
Thomas Mueller created OAK-7911:
---
Summary: Consistent and documented warning to traverse / read many
nodes
Key: OAK-7911
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7911
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
33 matches
Mail list logo
