[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angela updated OAK-568:
---
Attachment: OAK-568.patch
Duplicated code in TreeLocation implementations
angela created OAK-569:
--
Summary: NamedTemplate: Null-test for @Nonnull parameter
Key: OAK-569
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-569
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type: Improvement
angela created OAK-570:
--
Summary: Move user mgt related index definitions to security/user
Key: OAK-570
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-570
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type: Sub-task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angela updated OAK-516:
---
Assignee: (was: angela)
Create LdapLoginModule based on ExternalLoginModule
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angela updated OAK-516:
---
Assignee: angela
Create LdapLoginModule based on ExternalLoginModule
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13559505#comment-13559505
]
angela commented on OAK-516:
patch applied with minor modifications at revision 1436818.
leaving
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-570?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angela resolved OAK-570.
Resolution: Fixed
moved index definitions to the UserInitializer in revision 1436845.
note however, that this still
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-570?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13559563#comment-13559563
]
angela edited comment on OAK-570 at 1/22/13 11:51 AM:
--
moved index
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13560485#comment-13560485
]
angela commented on OAK-578:
i deliberately didn't add the backwards compatibility fallback setup
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angela resolved OAK-578.
Resolution: Invalid
Login with null credentials fails
-
Key:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13560915#comment-13560915
]
angela commented on OAK-443:
All tests pass but everything extending AbstractSecurityTest
angela created OAK-580:
--
Summary: Add Root#getRootTree (or getTreeRoot)
Key: OAK-580
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-580
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type: Wish
Reporter:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13561033#comment-13561033
]
angela commented on OAK-578:
CQ has a custom authentication setup anyway which needs to be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13561038#comment-13561038
]
angela commented on OAK-578:
so, i'd rather remove the OakConfiguration altogether and not having
angela created OAK-581:
--
Summary: IndexDefinition for Access Control Content
Key: OAK-581
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-581
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type: Sub-task
angela created OAK-583:
--
Summary: Inconsistencies in property index definitions
Key: OAK-583
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-583
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angela updated OAK-583:
---
Component/s: core
Inconsistencies in property index definitions
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angela resolved OAK-581.
Resolution: Fixed
added initial implementation without specifying declaring node types
(marked with a TODO)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-587?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angela updated OAK-587:
---
Component/s: mk
DefaultRevisionStoreTest.testConcurrentGC fails every now and then.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angela resolved OAK-589.
Resolution: Fixed
Revision: 1438100
add the default workspace name as param to the ContentRepositoryImpl
constructor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angela updated OAK-595:
---
Component/s: core
Naming consistency in QueryEngine#getRootTree
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angela moved JCR-3505 to OAK-595:
-
Workflow: no-reopen-closed (was: no-reopen-closed, patch-avail)
Key: OAK-595 (was:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13566561#comment-13566561
]
angela commented on OAK-597:
yes, i originally introduced such a unique property validator and
angela created OAK-598:
--
Summary: TreeLocation#NULL allows to reveal the existence of items
that are not accessible
Key: OAK-598
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-598
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
angela created OAK-599:
--
Summary: PropertyDelegate uses TreeImpl.PropertyLocation
Key: OAK-599
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-599
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13567536#comment-13567536
]
angela commented on OAK-599:
at the moment that would be my preferred solution as well.
angela created OAK-601:
--
Summary: Node#getVersionHistory fails with
UnsupportedOperationException
Key: OAK-601
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-601
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-601?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angela updated OAK-601:
---
Summary: Node#getVersionHistory fails with
UnsupportedRepositoryOperationException (was: Node#getVersionHistory fails
angela created OAK-602:
--
Summary: VersionManager is never updated
Key: OAK-602
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-602
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type: Sub-task
Components: jcr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13568797#comment-13568797
]
angela commented on OAK-598:
well... i don't think this is a wise move... if you have a given
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13568798#comment-13568798
]
angela commented on OAK-604:
as comment on OAK-598 i am not in favor of that move... so -1.
IMO
angela created OAK-607:
--
Summary: Old path after moving a new node
Key: OAK-607
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-607
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type: Bug
Components: jcr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angela updated OAK-606:
---
Component/s: jcr
Node becomes invalid after Session#move()
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13571401#comment-13571401
]
angela commented on OAK-607:
as far as i remember the discussion on the list was about the effect
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13571400#comment-13571400
]
angela commented on OAK-606:
as far as i remember the discussion on the list was about the effect
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13571416#comment-13571416
]
angela commented on OAK-606:
oh... moving the discussion topic without adjusting the subject...
angela created OAK-608:
--
Summary: Pluggable Authentication
Key: OAK-608
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-608
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type: Sub-task
Reporter: angela
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13571443#comment-13571443
]
angela commented on OAK-608:
see
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angela updated OAK-608:
---
Description:
subtask to make authentication setup configurable at runtime.
this also includes resolving the
angela created OAK-612:
--
Summary: Calling addNode on a node that has orderable child nodes
violates specification
Key: OAK-612
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-612
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13572726#comment-13572726
]
angela commented on OAK-612:
just had another look at the implementation and found that this is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13572726#comment-13572726
]
angela edited comment on OAK-612 at 2/6/13 7:40 PM:
just had another look
angela created OAK-613:
--
Summary: NPE in Property2IndexDiff#getIndexes(String) when
processing a removed node.
Key: OAK-613
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-613
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-613?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13573494#comment-13573494
]
angela commented on OAK-613:
committed the missing null check: revision 1443477.
alex, let me
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-613?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angela updated OAK-613:
---
Assignee: Alex Parvulescu
NPE in Property2IndexDiff#getIndexes(String) when processing a removed node.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13573510#comment-13573510
]
angela commented on OAK-581:
revision: 1443483
specified declaring node types to resolve the TODO
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13573588#comment-13573588
]
angela commented on OAK-343:
i resolved most remaining TODOs related to OAK-343 and fixed the
angela created OAK-615:
--
Summary: UserValidator should check for cyclic group membership
Key: OAK-615
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-615
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type: Sub-task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13573624#comment-13573624
]
angela commented on OAK-343:
the testCyclicGroups is fine and just needed the save calls to be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13573692#comment-13573692
]
angela commented on OAK-480:
resolved TODOs related to OAK-343 and fixed another bug in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13573730#comment-13573730
]
angela commented on OAK-612:
one solution that IMO should work with limit effort was extending
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13576719#comment-13576719
]
angela commented on OAK-606:
that makes more sense to me. while it's different from the behavior
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13576719#comment-13576719
]
angela edited comment on OAK-606 at 2/12/13 4:01 PM:
-
that makes more
angela created OAK-625:
--
Summary: Ability to pass workspace name to a CommitHook
Key: OAK-625
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-625
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13578360#comment-13578360
]
angela commented on OAK-583:
i fixed the failures some time ago... it's just about having it
angela created OAK-626:
--
Summary: Allow for setting orderable child nodes on the parent tree
Key: OAK-626
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-626
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angela updated OAK-626:
---
Attachment: OAK-626.patch
patch without test-cases... i can create those
if we agree on how to do it.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13578448#comment-13578448
]
angela edited comment on OAK-626 at 2/14/13 4:05 PM:
-
patch without
angela created OAK-627:
--
Summary: Move CommitHook(s) from KernelNodeStore to RootImpl
Key: OAK-627
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-627
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13578544#comment-13578544
]
angela commented on OAK-625:
added an initial draft in revision 1446289 that works with our
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13578591#comment-13578591
]
angela commented on OAK-626:
Something like setOrderable() or setOrderableChildren()
yes...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angela resolved OAK-626.
Resolution: Fixed
applied updated patch and added a few tests.
Allow for setting orderable child
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angela resolved OAK-612.
Resolution: Fixed
applied patch and run (integration) tests - resolving.
Calling addNode on a node
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13580595#comment-13580595
]
angela commented on OAK-625:
revision 1447237: move the init of validators and commit hooks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angela resolved OAK-625.
Resolution: Fixed
resolving for now... i will open subsequent issues in case this
needs further adjustment or
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angela updated OAK-634:
---
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug)
PasswordUtility.isSame() performance bottleneck
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13581206#comment-13581206
]
angela commented on OAK-634:
ok... so moving this to enhancement.
regarding your patch: do you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13581222#comment-13581222
]
angela commented on OAK-634:
well... i see the benefit of such a quick lookup but it bothers me
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angela updated OAK-640:
---
Component/s: core
Add WorkspaceInitializer
Key: OAK-640
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13581403#comment-13581403
]
angela commented on OAK-644:
i didn't follow the other issue. can you provide addition
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13581413#comment-13581413
]
angela commented on OAK-644:
thanks... this is indeed caused by work-in-progress commit of mine.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angela resolved OAK-644.
Resolution: Fixed
fixed revision 1447803.
in fact the wip permission hook is the culprit. since access
control is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13582051#comment-13582051
]
angela commented on OAK-634:
just two additional comments:
1) regarding the growing map: users
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angela updated OAK-634:
---
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
Summary: Optimization of uid/pw login (was: PasswordUtility.isSame()
performance
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13582085#comment-13582085
]
angela commented on OAK-634:
regarding masking issues: i would suggest that we don't stick to one
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-645?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angela reopened OAK-645:
well... i don't think we should export the complete package.
can you please limit the export to the utility? once we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13582214#comment-13582214
]
angela commented on OAK-640:
commit initial version at revision: 1448182.
add some addition
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-645?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angela resolved OAK-645.
Resolution: Won't Fix
Add OSGi package export for o.a.j.oak.security.authentication
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13586917#comment-13586917
]
angela commented on OAK-652:
as written on the mailing list i think we should optimize the way
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13586923#comment-13586923
]
angela commented on OAK-652:
btw: the whole node type package is IMO in quite a bad shape since
angela created OAK-660:
--
Summary: ReadOnlyTree: implement Object#equals and Object#hashCode
Key: OAK-660
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-660
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-660?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13589498#comment-13589498
]
angela commented on OAK-660:
proposed patch attached.
ReadOnlyTree: implement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-660?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13589543#comment-13589543
]
angela commented on OAK-660:
it's not about caching the node states, you got that wrong... it's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-660?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13589552#comment-13589552
]
angela edited comment on OAK-660 at 2/28/13 2:16 PM:
-
i built and had to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-660?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13589606#comment-13589606
]
angela commented on OAK-660:
However what Jukka wanted to point out is that within Oak the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-660?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13589658#comment-13589658
]
angela commented on OAK-660:
Where and how was that announced?
i posted that officially on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-666?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13593272#comment-13593272
]
angela commented on OAK-666:
this might go along with the lack of proper node type resolution
angela created OAK-680:
--
Summary: AbstractRepositoryTest: missing proper permission setup
Key: OAK-680
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-680
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type: Bug
angela created OAK-681:
--
Summary: ReadOnlyVersionManager.getVersionHistory throws NPE if
the versionstore is not accessible
Key: OAK-681
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-681
Project: Jackrabbit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13595747#comment-13595747
]
angela commented on OAK-101:
my preference was 1) as well unless it comes with unbearable
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angela updated OAK-696:
---
Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Task)
Parent: OAK-91
Support usage of JAAS based authentication with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angela updated OAK-696:
---
Issue Type: Task (was: Wish)
sure... :-)
Support usage of JAAS based authentication with Repository
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angela reassigned OAK-696:
--
Assignee: angela
Support usage of JAAS based authentication with Repository in OSGi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angela resolved OAK-696.
Resolution: Fixed
applied patch and additionally added the ldap-login module.
as discussed i moved at the same time
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13607434#comment-13607434
]
angela commented on OAK-696:
thanks!
Support usage of JAAS based authentication
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angela updated OAK-527:
---
Issue Type: Task (was: Sub-task)
Parent: (was: OAK-51)
Implement Permission evaluation
angela created OAK-704:
--
Summary: TreeImpl#canRead: pass ImmutableTree to permission
provider
Key: OAK-704
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-704
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type:
angela created OAK-708:
--
Summary: TreeImpl#getChildrenCount: doesn't respect permissions
Key: OAK-708
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-708
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type: Sub-task
angela created OAK-709:
--
Summary: Consider moving permission evaluation to the node state
level
Key: OAK-709
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-709
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13607456#comment-13607456
]
angela commented on OAK-704:
see OAK-709 for that subtask... i am currently filling in all the
101 - 200 of 4199 matches
Mail list logo
