[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13814015#comment-13814015
]
Jukka Zitting commented on OAK-1147:
bq. Jukka Zitting, do you remember what was the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13814019#comment-13814019
]
angela commented on OAK-1147:
-
ok... i will change it then and keep in mind in case we run into
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13814036#comment-13814036
]
angela commented on OAK-1147:
-
patch replacing #canReadAll by #canReadProperites and removing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13814037#comment-13814037
]
Jukka Zitting commented on OAK-1147:
I would expect {{canReadAllProperties()}} to check
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13814038#comment-13814038
]
Jukka Zitting commented on OAK-1147:
... perhaps the check should be renamed to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13814044#comment-13814044
]
angela commented on OAK-1147:
-
ok... but the counting method didn't test for the readability of
