[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15584812#comment-15584812
]
Michael Dürig commented on OAK-2498:
Patch LGTM AFAICS. I didn't follow through all the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15582302#comment-15582302
]
Francesco Mari commented on OAK-2498:
-
Another occurrence of lists in the codebase has t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15582248#comment-15582248
]
Francesco Mari commented on OAK-2498:
-
In an offline conversation with [~mduerig] and [~
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15545191#comment-15545191
]
Michael Dürig commented on OAK-2498:
This didn't gain us too much. I'm considering tryin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15544848#comment-15544848
]
Alex Parvulescu commented on OAK-2498:
--
sure, I'll post the results here
> Root record
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15544759#comment-15544759
]
Francesco Mari commented on OAK-2498:
-
[~alex.parvulescu], can you run your benchmark on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15542773#comment-15542773
]
Francesco Mari commented on OAK-2498:
-
I aligned the segment header in r1763183. Moreove
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15542376#comment-15542376
]
Alex Parvulescu commented on OAK-2498:
--
fyi based on the latest changes on this issue,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15542245#comment-15542245
]
Francesco Mari commented on OAK-2498:
-
[~mduerig], I committed the result of our quick p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15542217#comment-15542217
]
Francesco Mari commented on OAK-2498:
-
The refinements looks incorrect to me. Let's say
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15542073#comment-15542073
]
Michael Dürig commented on OAK-2498:
At http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1763148&view=re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15542070#comment-15542070
]
Michael Dürig commented on OAK-2498:
I had to refine this to properly account for duplic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15542013#comment-15542013
]
Michael Dürig commented on OAK-2498:
At http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1763140&view=re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15541936#comment-15541936
]
Francesco Mari commented on OAK-2498:
-
In r1763136 I removed the root record table from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15536369#comment-15536369
]
Francesco Mari commented on OAK-2498:
-
In r1762931 I added another 4 bytes to every entr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15493751#comment-15493751
]
Michael Dürig commented on OAK-2498:
For OAK-4740 we also need to be able to identify re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15426104#comment-15426104
]
Michael Dürig commented on OAK-2498:
While we introduce new record types, we should also
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15258870#comment-15258870
]
Michael Dürig commented on OAK-2498:
Good idea, thanks for pointing out.
Feel free to a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15258518#comment-15258518
]
Jukka Zitting commented on OAK-2498:
Another possible fix would be to break {{RecordType
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14319947#comment-14319947
]
Alex Parvulescu commented on OAK-2498:
--
I would opt for #1 and If I'm not mistaken, the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14319783#comment-14319783
]
Alex Parvulescu commented on OAK-2498:
--
I believe this might also help with OAK-2294. i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14314375#comment-14314375
]
Michael Dürig commented on OAK-2498:
This is a blocker for creating any kind of advanced
22 matches
Mail list logo